TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Premature birth rates have fallen in just three countries over past 20 years – report

More than one in ten births in 2010 was premature.

Image: Katie Collins/PA Archive/Press Association Images

THE LEVEL OF PREMATURE births has fallen in just three countries over the past two decades, says a new report published in the medical journal The Lancet.

Birth before 37 weeks gestation is the single biggest cause of neonatal deaths in the world and researchers say it is now the second-most common cause of death in children under 5, causing 1.1 million deaths a year.

More than one in every ten births (almost 15 million babies) in 2010 was a premature birth, according to new research carried out for the World Health Organisation which used national level estimates in its calculations.

Some 60 per cent of the premature births occurred in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. The research also found that while premature birth rates have levelled off in the US, European rates are increasing.

Of 65 countries covered in the study led by Save the Children, only Croatia, Ecuador and Estonia showed a reduction in the preterm birth rate from 1990 to 2010. The rate remained stable in a further 14 countries, but increased on average across the 65 countries from 7.5 per cent in 1990 to 8.6 per cent in 2010.

Ireland showed a 2.1 per cent increase in premature births between those years – the sixth-highest European increase.

Cyrus, Slovenia and Belgium recorded the highest increases in Europe, up 2.8 per cent, 2.6 per cent and 2.5 per cent respectively. The US had an average increase in premature births of 0.7 per cent.

“The countries with the fastest increases include many European countries, and in many cases the reasons are not clear although the effects on families and the health system are very apparent,” according to the report’s authors.

“Urgent attention is needed to better understand and reduce these rates of preterm birth. At the same time we are very clear what can be done to save the lives of babies born preterm and urgent action to provide feasible, lifesaving care in African and South Asian countries would result in rapid decreases in deaths.”

Researcher Nils-Halvdan Morken from University of Bergen and Haukeland University Hospital notes that the Institute of Medicine has estimated that premature births cost the US at least $26.2 billion a year, or $51,600 per preterm infant.

Read next:

Comments (7 Comments)

  • As someone who has gone through the experience of 3 premature births with my children, all pre 30 weekers, I don’t care what it costs.

    Reply
  • I think you may actually find that the most common reason for premature births is a condition known as preeclampysia, a condition which effects pregnant women for which there is currently no known cure except to deliver the baby.

    Reply
  • I can think of two reasons for this off the top my head. One is that both giving in birth later in life and conception through IVF are associated with more multiple births, which are much more likely to be premature. The other is that even when multiples aren’t involved, for some unknown reason, IVF babies are statistically more likely to be born prematurely. Given around 5% of babies in the UK are born through IVF and women are having babies much older than ever before, I’d say this accounts for a good bit of the increase.

    Reply
  • Don’t like the bit about the ‘ cost ‘ of pre-term births, surely that’s irrelevant, like those babies aren’t worth it ? !

    Reply
    • Joanna, there is a debate raging about this very subject in the US at present which probably accounts for it being mentioned in the article. The real worry is at some point the health systems or the insurers will not pay for the additional care that is required for our prematurely born children in part or in full.

      Reply

Add New Comment