TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 19 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Column: Let’s not cow-tow to ‘sacred’ cheese industry

Far from worrying that a ban on advertising cheese to children will hurt their calcium intake, says food writer Frank Armstrong, concerned gastronomes are missing the point…

Frank Armstrong

I HAVE PREVIOUSLY visited the topic of the persuasive power of advertising: Parents face an unenviable struggle orientating their children away from unhealthy sometimes even toxic foods in the face of fiendishly successful sales techniques.

In this uneven contest assistance from national authorities is required. Sweden banned all advertising directed at children under the age of 12 as far back as 1991. They did so because young children cannot make informed choices, and advertisers know what makes them tick.

The Broadcasting Authority of Ireland has made a brave decision, announcing that it intends to place a ban on the advertising of foodstuffs high in fat, sugar and salt directed at children before 9pm. With so many vested interests affected it was bound to encounter flak for acting like the ‘nanny state’ and discouraging some indigenous food production.

Unfortunately an old guard in Irish food has lined up against one aspect: its application to cheese which is high in salt and saturated fat. Tom Doorley pronounced as ‘brill’ a cartoon in the Irish Farmer’s Journal which features a photographer being chastised before 9pm for saying ‘Cheese’.

During heady Tiger days Doorley promoted wine for Spar, a company not known for prioritising the health of its customers. I don’t know of any branch of Spar that does not have a huge display of sweets and other junk foods next to each till. Sometimes I even find myself involuntarily muttering: ‘Mummy can I have one’.

“The esteemed gastronomes are missing the point”

Darina Allen, in a submission to the Authority, described the inclusion of cheese as ‘preposterous’. She said: “Irish people need more rather than less calcium in their diet”.

But the esteemed gastronomes are missing the point. There is a big difference between the effect of this provision on the artisan farmhouse cheeses that presumably they prize and mass-produced products like the waxy, homogenous ‘cheddars’ that fill the supermarket shelves. Artisan cheese producers don’t have the financial clout to advertise their produce, so they will not be suffering in the least. In fact a level playing field could allow them to prosper, and encourage more dairy farmers to start their own operations rather than continuing to supply the multiples.

And let us acknowledge that a diet high in cheese, particularly the industrial variety, is not considered healthy by any but the most unusual dieticians. The French paradox of diets high in saturated fat accompanied by a low incidence of heart disease is precisely that: a paradox. It seems that long-drawn out meals, consumption of a wide variety of fresh produce, as well as moderate quantities of red wine, are important in balancing the effect. The Irish, on the other hand, with a diet high in saturated fats feature among the highest rates of heart disease in Western Europe. We are still waiting for the paradox to kick in.

Whisper it: dairy may not be particularly good for us. Especially the kind we have today where cows have been bred to be an extraordinary size; live short over-worked lives of generally only three years (though they could continue to give milk for up to ten) before being packed off to the abattoir to be turned into hamburgers; and where up to 40 per cent of their diet is composed of mainly imported grain, a considerable quantity of which is genetically modified (Ireland imports 1 million tonnes of genetically modified grain). Let’s face it the ‘cow around the corner’ is poorly treated and eats vast quantities of grain of dubious origin.

The artisan model of cheese-making at least offers the prospect of a more refined product that will encourage us to linger over meals. Increased attention to animal welfare should make it a healthier alternative.

Much attention has been given in recent times to the profitability of the agricultural sector, but the promotion of intensive animal agriculture comes at the expense of tillage, and also means that we have among the lowest coverage of forest in the European Community; these are the opportunity costs of pasture.

“Eating a broad-based European diet will bring savings to our health services”

‘High Class’ Irish cuisine is really a sub-genre of French cuisine, with even greater emphasis on dairy. It is certainly not as unhealthy as another prevalent ‘cuisine’ in Ireland namely Americanised fast food, but eating organic meat, dairy and wild fish is possible only for a minority. We are left with a situation where, in general, the wealthy gravitate towards the Gaelic-Gallic fusion while the poor subsist on cheap meat and dairy and even cheaper sugar and refined grains; the diets of different social classes are reflected in life expectancies.

Notwithstanding economic difficulties we should not resign ourselves to a form of post-colonial agriculture based on exportable commodities like powdered milk for the Chinese market. I am not suggesting that a small northerly isle like Ireland strive for full self-sufficiency. Most residents of the state of Vermont would not wish to live only on foods produced there, and Ireland should see itself as a part of an emerging European federation. Eating a broad-based European diet will bring savings to our health services, and healthy food will make us more dynamic in other fields. Moreover, a greater emphasis on fresh fruit and vegetables, plant oils, seeds and nuts offers the prospect of an egalitarian healthy diet. Gastronomes should be encouraging this approach.

While not eschewing imports altogether, we should ensure that we grow a much wider variety of foodstuffs for domestic consumption to serve this need. Far more innovation is called for in our agriculture though certainly not of the genetically modified kind. We should explore ‘alternatives’ like sea vegetables for which Ireland has enormous potential, develop large-scale greenhouses that have almost disappeared and assess the viability of permacultures and forest gardens suited to our temperate climate. Also, during the Second World War a large proportion of Britain’s food needs were served by allotments. We can do a lot more.

Darina Allen should also take note that there are many sources of calcium other than dairy including the far greater concentration in sesame seeds; and hazelnut which has roughly the same proportion of calcium as milk and could easily be produced here. Irish-grown vegetables such as kale also contain significant quantities. Human beings survived for most of their evolutionary history without dairy and indeed there are difficulties associated with the absorption of calcium from it.

It may also be that some of Ballymaloe’s own products will fall foul of the ban. For example Ballymaloe ‘Country’ relish, a huge seller and popular with kids, has an undisclosed quantity of sugar on the label.

The advice of Michael Pollan seems apt: ‘Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants’. If only the undoubted skill of advertisers could be used to get that message across.

Frank Armstrong is a food writer and lecturer at University College Dublin’s Adult Education Centre.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (30 Comments)

  • I’ve never seen an ad for camembert or goats cheese during childrens tv. It’s those awful cheese derived products and spreads that are aimed at children and stopping that can’t be a bad thing.

    Reply
    • Cheese strings is one example, how in gods name can you make cheese into strings without some horrible unhealthy manufacturing process.

      Reply
    • Aidan 16/04/12 #

      God forbid you actually teach your kids what’s right wrong dint take to strangers and what needs moderation in life.

      Oh no you just want a government agency to do the work for you FFS

      Reply
    • @Aidan – You obviously don’t have kids. Take a ten year old child grocery shopping sometime. Bring them to the dairy section and ask them which cheese to buy? A penny to a pound says they will bring back some processed shite that they saw on an ad on TV. Cheese strings, calvita, baby bel etc.

      Parenting is a difficult enough job without low standards of advertising hindering the good work parents try to do. Kids have a limited enough palate as it is without television influencing it further.

      Reply
    • @Adrian. The solution is in your own comment. Don’t ask them what cheese to buy.

      Reply
  • Re advertising food to children, I agree the Swedish model of none at all is probably best – no one actually markets real food anyway – marketers actually market some form of Almost Food ™, which is “almost but not exactly totally unlike real food” to paraphrase Hitchhiker’s Guide.

    Nevertheless, the code, and all obesity fighting efforts will fail if they continue to focus on food constituents rather than food. The French paradox is not actually a paradox. A large and comprehensive Cochrane review has found that saturated fat is not associated with any disease, and when fats are carefully distinguished in research – a feature often lacking in early fat research – between trans fats, omega 6, omega 3 and saturated fats, they turn out to rank from most dangerous to least dangerous in that order.

    When it comes to foods, the most hazardous appear to be the sugars, the grains and the seed oils, which are all plentiful in foods requiring labels. Real foods – meat, fish, eggs, vegetables, fruit – usually don’t need labels, although I do generally read my dairy labels to ensure they haven’t messed with it too much by the removing the healthy K2 and CLA containing fat.

    Reply
  • This is an area that needs to be examined from a food labeling perspective if the Food Standards Agency we’re being useful. Is what is is being advertised on children’s TV “cheese” or would it be more accurately described as a “cheese based product” Likewise should burgers or chicken nuggets be described as meat or should they be more accurately labelled as meat based products. If I were to sell a table and chairs made from chipboard would it be correct for me to advertise them as a wooden? Surely Irish farmhouse cheese and some kind of processed muck turned into string should not be tared with the same brush?

    Reply
  • Here we go again. The lipid hypothesis has been discredited by science yet so-called food writers insist on demonizing saturated fats. This is willful ignorance at best. Refined carbohydrates are the dietary cause of heart disease and diabetes. And if you want the French paradox to be explained for you, it has to do with high levels of protective HDL cholesterol as a result of eating lots of quality saturated fats such as cheese.

    Reply
  • Blessed are the cheese makers?
    Of course he means makers of all dairy products.

    Reply
  • One thing I don’t understand, why doesn’t the Council, local or general subsidize the growing of healthy vegetables on some of the big open spaces. Surely the squashed, sweet potato,greens etc could be farmed and sold cheaply to the folks who are raising children and find it difficult to feed their families on nothing but cheap carbs. Such markets are springing up everywhere here. Families that have the land have no excuse for eating poorly. Beans are an excellent source of protein….(all jokes aside) and are much cheaper than meats. Just saying……

    Reply
  • Dead right, Frank!! And I mean DEAD.

    The vested interests which profit from poor diet and ill health are lining up to kill this initiative to protect children. Might we describe them as child abusers?

    Reply
  • I really hate when people take an article and use it to start pushing their own agenda that is *almost* linked to the point of the original but not quite. This is not about saturated fat or punishing retailers or what have you. Dairy is not the only or most amazing source of calcium we have. And the bright orange goo that looks nothing like real cheese is definitely not. It is basic common sense that we should not be advertising this stuff to kids…I just saw an ad yesterday for ‘spaghetti cheese’, I don’t even want to know how cheese got into a spaghetti-like state. Everybody and their mother knows that processed ‘foods’ are just a pile of chemicals manufactured to look vaguely like food we recognise. Surely not forcing this stuff on our kids via the television is a good thing?

    Reply
  • Animal welfare is a big issue for me as I expect it is for every human being with a heart. The factory farming of any animal species be they hens, chickens, cattle, pigs raises ethical questions and nobody needs a professional qualification in agriculture or nutrition to understand that. I’m not a vegetarian or a vegan, but I want to know the dairy products I consume are not derived from animals forced to live their lives in misery pumped up with antibiotics and growth promoters, just to generate greater profits for large agri-business. If any country on Earth should be a center for “Green Farming” Ireland should as that’s the image we have always traded on.

    Reply
    • We don’t need to worry about recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) as the EU banned it. We pay a hefty annual fine to Codex Alimentarius for taking this decision to preserve our health and not introduce this endocrine disruptor into the food chain too..

      Reply
  • The argument about restricting advertising to children is sound, regardless of the health benefits of cheese. Children below the age of 8 or so do not have the cognitive development to be able to determine the selling intent of advertisers and are therefore doomed to always be misled by any claims companies make in ads directed at them – and let’s face it, Cheese Strings ads that attempt to claim they are healthy because they contain calcium ARE misleading whatever way you look at it.

    Furthermore, it’s a bit odd for the likes of Darina Allen to be complaining about artisan cheesemakers suffering due to this – since when have any artisan cheesemakers had ads on during children’s TV programs? The only stuff that gets aimed at children is the woeful, mass produced and processed rubbish that surely no one outside of the manufacturers themselves and junk food lobbyists would ever claim to be ‘healthy’.

    Reply
  • Could it be that the problem lies in the presumption that consumers can only choose between ‘bad’ cheddar cheese and expensive artisan cheese? There are many varieties of cheese that are much healthier than cheddar and they’re neither artisan nor expensive, yet everyone seems to ignore them. Maybe that’s because the majority of Irish supermarkets, where most of us do our grocery shopping, have 20 different brands of cheddar on display and only a couple of other cheeses. Having said that, I’ve never seen cheeses like Mozzarella or Swiss cheese being advertised on TV either, but I guess that’s normal because they’re imported products. As long as Irish people think that cheddar is the only cheese out there (except when having pasta or pizza) and as long as ‘alternative’ cheese varieties are considered a luxury and are not available in mainstream supermarkets, I don’t see how a ban on advertising cheddar will make any difference.

    Reply
  • Considering the significance of public health concerns specific to young people, efforts and interventions are required to assist in tackling these issues. However, it is important that these efforts compliment existing guidelines and actually help the general public as opposed to causing confusion and mixed messages.

    The Department of Health’s Food Pyramid recommends three servings from the ‘milk, cheese & yogurt’ food group every day as part of a balanced diet. Teenagers should aim for five due to increased calcium requirements. A 1oz (28g) portion of cheddar-type cheese is an example of one serving.

    Cheese is a valuable source of many vitamins and minerals, particularly calcium. Irish national food surveys show that a considerable proportion of Irish children and teenagers have insufficient calcium intakes – for example, the National Teens’ Food Survey reported that 42% of teenage girls and 23% of teenage boys have inadequate calcium intakes. A portion of cheddar cheese (28g) provides 207mg calcium which equates to 26% of the Irish Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for calcium for 1-10 year olds and 17% of the Irish RDA for calcium for 11-17 year olds.

    Granted, calcium is present in a range of foods – but it is important to know which foods the body can easily access calcium from i.e. how bioavailable the calcium is! The ‘bioavailability’ of calcium in milk, cheese and yogurt is well-established – and these foods are recognised among the most bioavailable sources of this mineral. Certain plant foods do provide a source of calcium, but often the presence of certain components (e.g. oxalates and phyates) can inhibit absorption. The quantity or portion size, and how often certain foods are consumed should also be considered when evaluating their role as a source of specific nutrients in a balanced diet.

    If the BAI goes ahead with its proposals to put nutrient-rich foods such as cheddar cheese in a ‘less healthy’ category, whilst implying products like diet cola as healthier – this will inevitably result in confusion for anyone trying to follow a balanced diet.

    Dr. Catherine Logan
    Nutrition Manager, National Dairy Council

    Reply
    • To be honest the National Dairy Council would be better of promoting Artisan cheese producers in this case than the big cheese producers, but What else would you expect from a pig but a grunt.

      “Another significant discovery involved the relationship between milk consumption and osteoporosis. For years people have been told to drink milk to prevent osteoporosis. Campbell’s research with high dairy consumers proved the opposite to be true. Consuming either high or low-fat milk leads to acidosis in the body. In an attempt to bring an alkaline/acid balance the body leaches calcium from the bones which leads to osteoporosis.”
      The China Study; Professor T. Colin Campbell, Ph.D.

      Eat dairy if you want to, make it good quality, make sure you enjoy it. But don’t talk to me about the food pyramid, it’s a long time since that relic of the 70′s has been relevant. It wasn’t even relevant when it was produced. At least the new My Plate is a step in the right direction http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MyPlate.

      Reply
    • To what extent should an article written by the ‘Nutrition Manager’ of the National Dairy Council on the question of whether dairy is good for us be given any credibility?

      The Department of Health may well recommend 3-5 portions of dairy produce per day, but the Department may be subject to the kind of lobbying that can be seen in this comment. We have an enormous, and growing, dairy industry which is keen to sell its produce. The health arguments they adduce are self-serving.

      The weight of scientific evidence indicates that dairy produce is far from an ideal food source. According to the Harvard Medical School Special Health Report from 2011, ‘there is not a single health diet … instead there are many patterns of eating around the world that sustain good health. They share these things in common: lots of fruit, vegetables and wholegrains; healthy fats from fish and plant sources; and few sugars or solid fats’.

      Human beings have only been consuming cow’s milk for a few thousand years and in many parts of the world they don’t consume it at all. Moreover, cow’s are over-milked, a lot of the food they consume is imported and some of that genetically modified. They lead short over-worked lives and are then sent to abattoirs to be turned into cheap hamburgers.

      Human beings have many sources of calcium available to them. Dr. Logan suggests that we can’t absorb calcium from plant-based sources. Where is her evidence for that? From which plants can we absorb calcium?

      Cheese has significant quantities of saturated fat which according to the overwhelming weight of medical opinion is a cause of heart disease. It is also processed using a lot of salt which, due to the quantity of processed foods already in our diets, needs to be reduced.

      My own father underwent a triple heart bypass and was told to avoid cheese. I wonder, if he had consumed less cheese earlier in his life would he have been less prone to heart disease? Or are his doctors wrong?

      I enjoy Irish artisan cheeses, they taste great and I believe the standards of animal welfare are a lot better with small producers connected to their animals, but I refuse to occlude the health arguments. I don’t want to suffer my father’s fate.

      Reply
    • Er Catherine..

      You seem to have missed some important facts..
      In order for calcium to be deposited as bone it needs to be consumed alongside magnesium, phosphorous, manganese, boron, silica, vitamin D3 and K2. Weight bearing exercise is also required. The ratio of calcium to magnesium to phosphorous is crucial.

      Could you please list how much magnesium, manganese, boron and silica is present in milk and cheese?

      Also, as heat damages vitamins, how can you claim that the milk has been pasteurised but also contains D3 and K2? Unless these have been added later? And if so, are they natural form nutrients or synthetic vitamin isolates (eg, is your supplier a pharmaceutical company?)

      Also, as the calcium found in milk is bound up in largely indigestible casein, how exactly is it the best source?

      And then there’s pasteurisation.. Why is it we do that again? To remove bacteria? And why is the bacteria there? Because those poor cows are milked so vigourously that their udders get infected and pus ends up in the milk?

      With regards the food pyramid, it suggests high intake of two of the worlds most common food allergens (gluten and DAIRY). We are the only species that continues to drink milk after we wean (in spite of the fact that we lose the enzymes to digest milk as we grow older).
      The only reason these common allergens are on the food pyramid at all is down to lobbying by groups such as yours.

      Reply
    • @ Catherine Logan

      I agree, doesn’t make sense, but see my comment above on processed cheese. Surely not all cheese is the same? For instance chess from grass fed animals will surely have greater concentrations of vitamin D than milk cattle housed indoors and grain fed and isn’t vitamin D very important for how calcium is absorbed by the body? Processed cheese products will have a high salt content etc. Shouldn’t there be some official definition on what constitutes “cheese” so people know what they’re buying is cheese especially if there are health issues with some of these processed products concerning high salt or other additives?

      Reply
    • Here’s another question for you..

      Why was my friends teenage daughter given an assignment at school to do marketing for the dairy council via Facebook?
      They were to set up a page about how fantastic milk was and promote it. The dairy councils logo was all over it, I cannot confirm or deny whether this was requested by the dairy council of the school or the students, but surely they would not have been permitted to use the registered trade mark if this was not the case?

      The class was only given the official industry line, its not likely any thought to read up on orthomolecular research or to search Cochrane. Their teacher or equivalent told them this was so and they took them at their word.
      Taking authority as truth rather than truth as the authority.

      I was highly offended at its appearance knowing the circumstance behind it. You pay a marketing department, why exploit teenagers to do their job for them?

      Reply
  • I wonder are you Michael Patten formerly Group Communications Director at Glanbia (International dairy food company)?! If a nutritionist happens to be paid by an organisation to promote a particular product that nutrtionist can no longer be viewed as an objective observer.

    Reply
  • Frank Armstrong you have some cheek questioning the credentials of a qualified nutritionist when you are neither a nutritionist or an agriculturalists. Your article is riddled with inaccuracies and mistruths. Such polemic should come with a health warning.

    Reply
  • I haven’t worked for Glanbia for nearly 10 years and was very proud to work with them when I did. They are a great Irish company. I know a lot about the subject and, while debate is great, I think personalisation and misinformation isn’t.

    Reply
  • With respect Michael Patten, your comments on the author of this piece where quite personal if not scathing. There is no rule anywhere that states, a food writer must be a qualified nutritionist or agriculturalist before they can write such a piece . Frank Armstrong makes a valid comment above in relation to Dr. Logan. On their own website, the National Dairy Council (NDC) formerly the National Dairy Publicity Council, states it was established by the Minister of Agriculture in 1964, as a semi-state body with the aim of “maintaining an supporting the growth in the consumption of milk and dairy products.” It has no public health remit therefore, it is not an independent party in this discussion, and the author is correct to point out Dr. Logan is doing what she is paid to do ensuring people continue to eat more dairy produce. Also, I’m sure Glanbia are a great company to work for but again they are a business, not a public health agency,

    Reply
  • Good lord, a verbal slap in the face to a great swathe of the retail industry. I couldn’t keep reading after the kicking you have spar, just went down to check your credentials. Do you want all shops to become clones of the food section of M&S? I *never* get groceries in M&S, I feel the place is pretentious, as do a majority.

    I started reading this thinking you had a good point re: cheese, and I still think you do, but that slur on retailers was uncalled for.

    Reply
    • Retailers respond to what sells best, and what sells best? Shite you see on television! In my local Supervalu, you have the quick stop newsagent section before you enter the main store. There is no other way around this. All they stock is newspapers, greetings cards, soft drinks, chocolate bars, and crisps. When you do go in to the main part of the store, get your few bits, and have joined the queue at the checkout, you are greeted by a rack of chocolate bars. try this in the company of a child sometime and wait for their reaction.

      It’s not just a slur on retailers, it’s a slur on advertising standards, and the way taste is permeated by an injected desire.

      Reply

Add New Comment