TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Column: Here’s why it matters that KildareStreet.com has been killed off

The website which gave people access to Oireachtas debates was widely-praised for providing a much-needed resource – so why has it been cut off, asks Simon McGarr.

Simon McGarr

TUESDAY WAS THE first day back at school for the Houses of the Oireachtas. Since then, Senators have stood up and made speeches on their hobby horses. The Government came back with the long-delayed wording for a referendum on children’s rights. The Minister for Health survived a motion of no confidence.

And, buried in all this bustle, the dead hand of the State managed to kill off KildareStreet.com, one of the brightest and best examples of what the Government is always saying it wants to see. Citizens (mostly one citizen) taking public data sets, provided in an open standard, and making something much much better than the State had ever managed.

If you have ever tried to search for anything on the Houses of the Oireachtas website, you can understand why I can confidently say it is the worst thing in the Universe. It is probably worse than that but language must fail beyond a certain level of awfulness.

The search doesn’t work and never did. You can’t link to any particular part of a debate. You can’t look for contributions by a particular Oireachtas member. Basically, you can’t do anything you could possibly imagine you might actually want to use a record of the Oireachtas debates for.

KildareStreet.com works. It does everything the Oireachtas website should always have done. It even does extra things – like let you sign up for email alerts if a particular phrase is mentioned.

And on 17 September, the Houses of the Oireachtas just pulled the plug on the whole glorious thing. They did it without warning (though they were fully aware of KildareStreet.com’s existence and utility) and they did it would caring about the consequences for KildareStreet.com’s over half-a-million users. In doing so, they demonstrated that our State is either guided by petty minded malice or is driven by block-headed ignorance.

Was this malice? Or stupidity?

The magic sauce that made KildareStreet.com possible wasthe provision of the debates record in structured XML format. This is basically an open format common to debate records in the UK, the UK and around the world. It is owned by nobody and is available to all to write code around. It was this common base that allowed KildareStreet.com to reuse lots of the code which runs the TheyWorkForYou.com website in the UK.

As of Monday, the Houses of the Oireachtas has just stopped producing XML. They’ve even stopped producing an RSS feed. From their web addresses, it looks to me that they have moved from the international open standard of XML to… Lotus Notes.

Yes. I know. Lotus Notes. Not just a proprietory format. But a really stupid one. Here’s a hint: The future should never involve the phrase “More Lotus Notes”.

We’re told that we should never ascribe to malice something which can be explained by stupidity. But I do think it is important to recognise the context in which this decision- to kill XML without debate or warning- was taken. Here’s the KildareStreet.com blog. Sample:

The lazy, incompetent fools who get paid substantial amounts of your money for not doing the job they’re paid for, in respect of publishing the Official Transcript of Dáil proceedings, have now actually surprised us.

They’re now not bothering to correct their errors at all, which is a new and unpleasant departure from their previous form, where they’d shove any old rubbish up and then quietly airbrush their failings out of existence in the ensuing day or two.

There is a cartoon on the front page showing counting the days since the last time the Dáil Official Record was published without errors. It currently shows 237 days.

It is hardly a step too far to imagine that a bureaucracy would react to criticism from a person who is passionate about the outcome of their work by happily silencing him.

For whatever reason it was taken, we, the public have been harmed by this decision. KildareStreet.com should have been embraced by the Houses of the Oireachtas, prickles and all. It provided a plethora of services in an area where the state had simply failed. Instead, it has been stifled.

In November of 2011, the Irish Open Data week set out the opportunities for both commercial and public-spirited reuse of public data sets. After the Houses of the Oireachtas has killed off, without warning, the biggest and best such project in the country, who would bother to try again?

Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.

Simon McGarr is a solicitor with litigation firm McGarr Solicitors. This article originally appeared on Tuppenceworth.ie.

Read next:

Comments (14 Comments)

  • This has to be prevented – KildareStreet is an invaluable resource and a great tool for open and transparent government

    Reply
  • Good luck to anyone trying to find out information about their local representative now. Kildare Street was an invaluable resource.

    Reply
  • I guess there isn’t an allowance to cover this ;)

    Reply
  • A well written and slightly tongue in cheek article Simon!

    Perhaps, like the Croke Park agreement, this website have been axed because the government knows what’s coming, i.e. they want to put in place their own ‘petitions’ website, so that the dearly beloved, public can talk to them directly through the ‘appropriate’ internet channels.

    Reply
    • The website isn’t a Government website. It was an independent site using data provided by the Oireachtas IT Department. That data is no longer being produced. The information however is still present and viewable on the official House of the Oireachtas site.

      This seems like a silly decision although I don’t think it was done with malice. Its probably somebody in the department saying “we can save a bit of money by not doing this” and not worrying about the consequences. After all it obviously doesn’t affect their own site so why would they care.

      That being said this is disappointing. As somebody who did have to check one of these site for speeches and comments by TDs I have to say that Kildare Street was a lot better than the official Houses of the Oireachtas site when it came to searching for information.

      Reply
    • censored 20/09/12 #

      They switched over to lotus notes instead of the XML format. That probably took some work, which costs money.

      Like the “business cases” they’ve been doing to keep the allowances. All on our time.

      Reply
  • The situation is regrettable, but this column really does not help at all – you quote posts from Kildarestreet.com about “lazy incompetent fools” which are timestamped from 2009, and don’t really relate directly to the current Lotus Notes issue, linking to a twitter search on the terms “hate lotus notes” is not a cogent critique of the shortcomings of the product.

    The statement from kildarestreet.com on the issue ( at http://www.kildarestreet.com/statement2012/ ) is accurate and reasonable, and represents a much better starting point for a debate about open data.

    For what it’s worth, since V 6 Lotus has had “Domino XML language”, and there are tools to export XML from Notes, so however bad Notes may be, there are ways to resolve this and expose the data, and it simply requires a bit of work to turn them on and let it flow. The problem is not insurmountable, but calling people names is not a good way to move towards resolving it. I know there are people in IBM who believe in open data, so I imagine this can be fixed.

    Reply
  • Wow this is annoying.

    btw, two small things:
    1) It’s always been a Lotus Notes driven system. Any change that removed XML was either because they moved off Notes (which doesn’t seem to be the case) or because they did an “update” which turned off XML
    2) The errors are because they prioritise speed of publishing over accuracy. This has been the tradition since long before the Oireachtas came into being. The drafts (“blacks”) are available to members, who can make suggested edits/corrections. Then, a few days later, the official record is published. I wouldn’t be too concerned about errors existing in the first draft, as it’s not intended to be error free.

    Reply
  • never heard of iti

    Reply

Add New Comment