TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Syria forces in new assault as diplomatic talks break down

Kofi Annan and President Assad’s meeting came to a deadlock in the capital city.

Image: SANA Syrian Arab News Agency

SYRIAN TROOPS PUSHED ahead with a new assault on the northern region of Idlib today despite Kofi Annan’s presence in the country.

According to reports, the government’s forces shelled Idlib, one of the centres of the uprising against President Bashar Assad’s rule and sending families fleeing for safety as armed rebels tried to fend off the attack.

The military operation has raised fears that the regime is planning a new all-out offensive similar to the bloody siege last month that captured a restive part of the city of Homs.

While the fighting raged, UN envoy Kofi Annan met with Assad in Damascus during a high-profile international mission trying to bring a halt to fighting and arrange talks between the two sides to end the country’s yearlong conflict.

But the mission was already hitting dead ends. Assad told Annan that any political dialogue was doomed to fail “as long as there are armed terrorist groups that work to spread anarchy and destabilize the country,” according to the state news agency SANA. The regime blames terrorists acting out a foreign conspiracy for the uprising, not protesters seeking change.

The opposition as well has rejected dialogue, saying it is impossible to talk to Assad’s regime after a crackdown that the UN estimates has killed more than 7,500 people. Activists put the toll even higher, at more than 8,000.

Another siege?

In the town of Idlib, a number of families fled, clutching their belongings, according to an Associated Press team in the town, the main centre of the northern region. A group of women and children huddled with blankets in a room of one building. Troops that are moving in place to encircle the town battered it with dozens of tanks shells from dawn until noon, the AP team said.

Armed opposition fighters dashed through the streets, taking cover behind the corners of buildings in clashes with the troops. Wounded fighters were pulled into trucks to be sped to clinics for treatment. A group of men used shovels to destroy speed bumps along one street to allow ambulances and other rescue vehicles to drive faster.

Military reinforcements have been pouring into Idlib this week, including dozens of tanks and armored personnel carriers, activists said, reporting that dozens have been killed in the area in recent days. Their casualty reports could not be independently confirmed. The moves suggested the regime was now turning its focus on Idlib after recapturing the rebel-held district of Baba Amr in the central city of Homs, in a month-long assault that reportedly killed hundreds and devastated the district.

The Homs bloodshed further fueled calls among Arab countries and the West for action to stop the crisis, which many fear is moving closer to civil war as the opposition turns more to armed resistance.

Syria forces in new assault as diplomatic talks break down
1 / 3
  • Mideast Syria

    People remove a speed bump to allow ambulances and fighters' vehicles to drive faster in a neighborhood where fierce fighting lasted for hours between Free Syrian Army fighters and government troops in Idlib. (AP Photo/Rodrigo Abd)
  • Mideast Syria

    A Free Syrian Army fighter runs for cover during fighting against government troops in Idlib. (AP Photo/Rodrigo Abd)
  • Mideast Syria

    Free Syrian Army fighters take cover during fierce fighting against government troops in Idlib, north Syria, Saturday, March 10, 2012. (AP Photo/Rodrigo Abd)

International intervention

Earlier today, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov defended his country’s stance on the crisis to Arab leaders who are angered by Moscow’s blocking of international pressure on Syria’s president to step down. Last month, just as the Homs offensive was heating up, Russia and China vetoed a draft UN Security Council resolution that would have supported an Arab League peace plan calling on Assad to hand over his powers.

That brought accusations that Russia, a longtime Assad ally, was giving Assad diplomatic cover to intensify his crackdown.

“We are not protecting any regimes,” Lavrov insisted at a heated session of the Arab League in Cairo. “We are protecting international law.”

He said Russia was trying to “promote a peaceful resolution” to Syria’s crisis and that the immediate mission now is to halt violence and enable humanitarian assistance to reach those in need in Syria.

Speaking after him, Qatar’s prime minister sharply criticised Lavrov’s remarks. “There is systematic genocide by the Syrian government,” Sheik Hamad bin Jassem Al Thani said, adding that Arabs are not looking for a cease-fire anymore after “genocide” and “systematic killings” of Syrians.

Despite the differences, the Arab League and Lavrov agreed on a five-point plan aimed at resolving the crisis in which the League appeared to back down on previous demands that Assad step aside. The plan calls for a halt in violence by all sides, a “neutral” mechanism to ensure a cease-fire, unhindered entry for humanitarian aid to Syrians and support for political dialogue between the opposition and regime. It also came out against any foreign intervention in the crisis.

Five point plan

The League’s backing down on its demands for Assad’s sidelining appeared aimed at securing Russian support at the UN Security Council for a new resolution on Syria backing the five-point formula.

“Its not a perfect world,” League chief Nabil Elaraby said. “There is no contradiction. This is the utmost we can get. …Now we are trying to get around (revolve) around the veto and go the Security Council without a veto.”

Still, French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe said he doubted any new resolution could be pushed through because of a lack of consensus among countries over the text and Russia’s opposition. “Unfortunately despite the hopes we had, Russia continues to block on these different points,” he said, adding that he did not expect progress before the Security Council holds a special session on the Arab Spring in New York on Monday.

Annan’s visit to Damascus marks a new international push for peace nearly a year after protesters took to the streets to demand Assad’s ouster, inspired by Arab Spring uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt. Since then, the regime has dispatched snipers, tanks and civilian gunmen to crush dissent. As the death toll mounted, protests have spread, and some have taken up arms to defend themselves and attack government forces.

Hoping for a ceasefire

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told reporters yesterday that Annan’s priority is to immediately halt all fighting by government forces and opposition fighters – if not simultaneously, then first by government troops, followed by the opposition.

Ban said a cease-fire should be quickly followed by inclusive political talks to resolve the yearlong conflict.

But there is a widening gap between opposition leaders who say only military aid can stop Assad’s regime, and Western powers who fear more weapons will exacerbate the conflict.

So far, Western powers have declined to intervene. Unlike Libya, where a UN-sanctioned bombing campaign helped rebels topple Muammar Gaddafi last year, Syria has key allies in Iran and the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, and shares a border with the region’s closest American ally, Israel. Outright war in Syria could spark a regional conflagration.

Annan, the former UN secretary-general, was appointed last month as the joint special envoy of the United Nations and the Arab League.

Earlier: Kofi Annan meets Syrian president in bid to defuse violence>

Read next:

Comments (7 Comments)

  • I hope the Arab League will send in an army to protect civilians. We don’t need an Arab Rwanda.

    Reply
  • The UN is a toothless organisation it’s a disgrace. How can 2 countries play with the lives of thousands of people. A lot to be said for aggressive action to save innocent lives.

    Reply
    • Oh but no doubt if that happened they’d say it was the Western occupation. And Boyd Barrett and the others would be out screaming no to war.

      Reply
    • Your right ray,in many respects it is a toothless entity and proves its worth only when its principal players have their interests threatened,Syria is paying a heavy price because like other lands,eg.Rwanda ,it has no vast oil wealth or such things. I think Rwanda was the ultimate example of how inept the UN is,I grieve to see Syria or any other land suffer and cry in vain for help.

      Reply
    • As long as the UN has Syria etc on its Human rights council can we really expect it to ever improve human rights ???

      Last year Libya was on the council

      Google UN Watch to read more about UN bias and double standards

      Reply
  • i don’t get it
    the same thing thats happening in syria happened in libya …and the french step in to back the people
    why is no-one stepping intop the syrians …..oh wait there in siginificant amounts of Oil in Syria AH THAT EXPLAINS a lot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    words from the un(bunch of pussies), the us or anywhere else are not worth shite,
    these peop’s need military help

    Reply

Add New Comment