TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Wikileaks, Ecuador condemn ‘UK threat to storm’ embassy for Assange

The Wikileaks founder continues in his bid to avoid extradition to Sweden.

Police officers outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in central London last night.
Police officers outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in central London last night.
Image: Yui Mok/PA Wire/Press Association Images

AS ECUADOR DECIDES whether to grant political asylum to Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, the diplomatic fallout grows with the South American government accusing the UK of making ‘dangerous’ threats.

The British Government maintains it can enter the Ecuadorian embassy – where Assange sought refuge from extradition – and arrest the 41-year-old under the Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act of 1987.

Even the mention of such a move has angered Wikileaks, which has also condemned the presence of police outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in Central London.

A statement issued overnight claimed that the UK is “willing to risk an international incident to arrest a man charged with no crime”.

Both Wikileaks and Ecuador have called on Britain to resolve the situation “according to peaceful norms of conduct”.

Wikileaks believes the perceived threat is “designed to preempt Ecuador’s imminent decision” on whether it will grant asylum to Assange. That decision is due to be revealed by the Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino and President Rafael Correa at noon today. “A threat of this nature is a hostile and extreme act, which is not proportionate to the circumstances, and an unprecedented assault on the rights of asylum seekers worldwide,” continued the statement.

Assange, an Australian national, has been staying in the embassy since June in an attempt to avoid extradition to Sweden where he is wanted for questioning over a number of alleged sex crimes.

He claims that his safety would be at risk as Sweden could turn him over to the US where he could face espionage and conspiracy charges. He angered Washington with his website after releasing a flood of classified information about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Earlier today, his mother said that the United States was behind the British threat. “What the US wants, the US gets from its allies,” she said from Australia, “regardless of if it is legal or if it is ethical or in breach of human or legal rights.”

Although Ecuador has been angered by the steps already taken by the British government, a spokesperson for the Foreign Office said police were ready to arrest Assange for breaching terms of bail granted in 2010.

“The UK has a legal obligation to extradite Mr Assange to Sweden to face questioning over allegations of sexual offenses and we remain determined to fulfill this obligation,” the spokesman said in London.

Assange denies all allegations against him in Sweden. He exhausted all of his options in Britain after appearing in the Supreme Court in June and proceeded with his application to Quito.

-Additional reporting by AFP

Background: WikiLeaks founder Assange seeks Ecuador asylum>

More: The Ballad of Julian Assange’ among songs featuring on new Wikileaks CD>

Read next:

Comments (37 Comments)

  • Kevin 16/08/12 #

    Isn’t it funny how nations around the world are conspiring to shut 1 man up.. Simply for telling the truth. What a world we live in.

    Reply
  • As far as I recall the people he is accused of sexually assaulting are not minors and have not made a complaint against him. The Swedish government has.

    Reply
  • HMG are playing a dangerous game, threatening to abuse the 1987 Act in this way. The only way (that I see) it could be used is to revoke the diplomatic status of the Ecuadorian Embassy, which is a very hostile act in international relations.

    Reply
  • Has something like this happened before? Does anybody know? The police had cordoned off the whole area before dawn, looked as if they might go ahead. Seemed to have backed down again. I can’t believe the UK would do this. Although they did illegally take over the Chagos Islands and deported every member. It’s funny aswell that the UK called for a boycott of the 1980’s Moscow Olympics because Russian troops were in Afghanistan. London hosts the 2012 games with troops in Afghanistan and there is not one word in media about the hypocrisy.

    Reply
    • Dave , to me the point is that even the Soviet masters of Hungary , from 1956 to 1971, did not do this in the case of Cardinal Mindszenty who was in the US Embassy. The US would have been enraged and Britain as well. This is not an apologia for anyone on the rn. It is a matter of Principle.

      Reply
    • I did not know this, I knew russians were in the country, but not of the englands objections regarding moscow games (was not born) Love history!

      Reply
  • If he is given asylum how do they get him out of the country do they make him a diplomat for the immunity it gives ?

    Reply
  • Resel 16/08/12 #

    He seems pretty smart to be able to play the system like this. Would make a good movie.

    Reply
  • Ecuador could appoint Assange as an ecuadorian diplomat, which would grant him immunity from arrest. Realistically though, he’s screwed.

    Reply
  • “Expect the unexpected”

    Reply
  • Kevin 16/08/12 #

    So you believe, in all your wisdom, that if Assange was just your everyday run-of-the-mill rapist, that the UK government would be going after him with the same resolve; threatening to break the rule I international law just to arrest him? If you believe that, you will believe anything!

    Reply
  • Tories in power, what else would you expect?
    Mind you, if Bliar had still been in Assange would would have been sharing a cell with Bradley Manning for a long time by now.

    Reply
  • Dave 16/08/12 #

    The UK government violating other’s sovereign territory? Surely not???

    Reply
  • The UK…. great neighbours & friends of Washington.. nothing more to say us there..

    Reply
  • Unfortunately out neighbour is very deep in bed with the USA

    Reply
  • If the British are stupid enough to do this – forever after, it will be open season to do the same on them if the occasion arises.
    They throw the whole issue of embassies being hands off areas, into the air for ever more.

    ..And all to do their masters bidding who is leading them like a dog on a collar!

    Reply
  • Disgraceful carry on by the UK Police State, as per usual

    Reply
  • August 20 2012 – arrest warrant issued for Assange

    August 21 2010
    The arrest warrant is withdrawn. one of Stockholm’s chief prosecutors, Eva Finne says, “I don’t think there is reason to suspect that he has committed rape,” says one of Stockholm’s chief prosecutors, Eva Finne. Rosander says the investigation into the molestation charge will continue but it is not a serious enough crime for an arrest warrant.

    any suggestion that Assange ran or has evaded justice is wrong, and the position taken now by Sweden was a situation taken under US instruction

    and Jason – give me a break – 70 % of the people of Northern Ireland are Protestant, of course they would want to remain part of the UK, thats a political perspective taken on the rules set by the powers who partitioned the place – the people of Ireland who vastly outnumber the 70% of the protestants -want a united Ireland and whats more important is – Ireland belongs to the Irish, as the Falklands do to Argentina

    a colonial or occupying powers perspective will always distort the view through assistance financial or otherwise to get a result they want – we had a referendum here in Australia on whether we ramain a commonwealth or a republic, and despite the majority view that a republicv was wanted, the questions were framed tand the process flawed to ensure a particular result

    so dont go quoting the 70% want to be British – i can get a similar oposing result if the question was asked in a particular way

    the original point being that the UK has distorted the arguments to their favour to assist whatever position they wanted to achieve without fairness to the principles that define nations, behaviour and a nation or individuals rights

    i will never forget what they did to our country, the Guildford 4 and the numerous instances overseas where they have oustripped commonly held beliefs, ideals and laws just to suit a purpose

    whats happening here is wrong on so many levels that every country should be warned, that there no rules or accepted standards when ruled uponby the masters

    it makes the internationla criminal courts, the UN and the NATO just puppets of the countries

    you either apply the very same rules to everyone – or not at all

    Reply
  • Signed, don’t quote the its our policy line, that’s just like the UK and the US claiming rights in this matter – it seems to me that the hysteria surrounding this matter it was inevitable ppl would get facts wrong, but that’s why u are there, to correct them, not delete them – given there’s no court order pending any publication of any fact true ior otherwise the whole point in this issue centres around the right to print, publish and make statements, that some claim to be untrue, that others take issue with and some like you seem to take issue with – seems like you are standing on the wrong side of the issue – the right to freedom of expression – seems to me from what I read nothing was discriminatory or defamatory – therefore not questionable – if someone got some facts wrong, what proof do U have to confirm these – what I have seen is that the media have been so so working on the factual matters so far – Assange was never charged, he was interviewed by the prosecutor in Sweden, released free to leave the country and was only called back after the US got involved – there was no rape, it was consensual sex between the parties – who actually pursued Assange – and the steps taken by the UK police are tantamount to declaration to repeal all consular rights everywhere – the same police sleek set up the Guildford 4, the same country that claims because the majority of falkland islanders want to remain in the UK, then that’s the defining standard yet when mirrored on Northern Ireland claim loss of memory – its disgraceful behaviour from the two powers in the world who hold us all to a standard they themselves don’t live by – but that’s not surprising coming from countries who practice rendition and torture

    Reply
  • UPDATE: http://news.sky.com/story/973139/assange-granted-asylum-by-ecuador-sources

    Ecuador grants Julian Assange political asylum.

    Reply
  • Hi Michael, id agree with your comment but something is definitely not right with the allegations of the man, not to mention assange’s wikileaks releasing files on American activities abroad. I may do research,but wasn’t there files to be released and then oh, he raped someone and America wanted him extradited to the US? Again im going by memory flashes here,nothing to back up my comment

    Reply
  • The police methods are extreme (but there is no storming implied in the headline) yet so are those of Assange in his avoidance of extradition.

    Whatever your views, he has a European Arrest Warrant out for his arrest and broke one of the conditions of his bail – a criminal offence. The sexual assault case ultimately needs to be answered so before you decry today’s actions you must also look at the hoops Assange has forced the authorities to jump through.

    Personally I find it ironic that a man who knowingly broke a multitude of laws in his dissemination of Wikileaks data is now clinging from one legal loophole to the next. Now bring on the inevitable thumbs down for having the temerity to speak negative of Assange…

    Reply
    • Derek 16/08/12 #

      He isn’t even facing charges, there has been no wrong doing. Neither of the two women claimed rape or sexual abuse nor where they underage. This is nothing more than the US through proxy of Sweden pushing the UK to uphold it’s legal obligation to extradite him to Sweden under what he was already non charged and released for and allowed travel to Britain, as there was no case Sweden couldn’t do anything, but the US are still butt hurt after wikileaks and are using this non existent charge to get him extradited to Sweden there he can be extraditedto the States.

      Reply
    • I didn’t say he was facing charges or that there were any minors associated with the case. As you mention, the women did not claim rape or sexual abuse but the nature of their claims led to Swedish Government to pursue Assange and at this point, he has broken bail conditions, is a rape suspect and has an international warrant out for his arrest. I think the case should be answered and saying “there has been no wrong doing” is biased because neither you or I know what did or didn’t happen during the event in question.

      Reply
  • Sinead, why r u deleting comments – oh yeah, it’s only freedom if expression if it’s what u want to hear, right ??

    Reply
  • why are the other comments being deleted including mine

    Reply
  • Irish governments have allowed US troops to land at Shannon airport.
    Hardly in any position to condemn the Brits for being pro American are we?
    Plus the extradition is this case is from the UK to Sweden not to the US.

    Reply
    • If anyone thinks Sweden is not under severe pressure and threats from the US – they are fooling themselves.
      Do a google search, the US has already made threats against the county as well as further diplomatic pressure also involving trade embargo’s besides other forms of pressure.

      The fact that the Britain is just doing the USA’s (their master) bidding, is generally acknowledged by those that have the foresight to see the connections of political and legal manoeuvring.

      Want another case? Just look at what the US is willing to do to get Mr Dot Com!

      Reply
  • Dennis, sorry mate, using a iPhone and it’s a one fingered task so I’m doing the best that I can

    “,)

    Reply
  • Hi Michael, id agree with your comment but something is definitely not right with the allegations of the man, not to mention assange’s wikileaks releasing files on American activities abroad. I may do research,but wasn’t there files to be released and then oh, he raped someone and America wanted him extradited to the US? Again im going by memory flashes here,nothing to back up my comment

    Reply
    • @ Diarmuid – he wasn’t charged with any offence, he didn’t raise anyone, it was and is in the record in Sweden that it was consensual sex between the girls – and as for Assange disseminating any US files, so what. – its what the media do every day, it’s called NEWS, he did nothing wrong

      Reply

Add New Comment