Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The High Court. Pic: Alamy.
High Court

Pair seek to halt trials for offences arising out of alleged sexual assault

The young men claim that their criminal trials should be halted on the grounds that there has been an ‘inexcusable delay’ in prosecuting them.

TWO YOUNG MEN have launched High Court action aimed at halting their prosecutions arising out of an alleged incident when a teenage girl claims she was sexually assaulted by several male schoolmates.

The two males, who cannot be named for legal reasons, claim that their criminal trials should be halted on grounds including that there has been an inexcusable delay of over 20 months in prosecuting them.

The delay they further claim means that they have been denied the opportunity to be tried as minors in relate to offences that allegedly occurred when they were both 15 years of age.

The charges against the two males arise out of an incident that occurred in a public park in June 2019.

A teenage girl claims that she was prevented from leaving a place she had gone to make a phone call by approximately eight teenage boys.

It is claimed that at the time of the alleged assault the males were all second level students who attended the same school as the girl.

The girl claims that one of the males told her to perform a sex act on another one of the males present, who it is alleged had pulled down his trousers exposing his penis.

She tried to leave the area, but says she was prevented from doing so by two of the males.

She claims that some of the males began touching her, and also got on top of her.

She claims couldn’t get them off her and agreed to kiss one of the males so they would let her leave the location.

The complainant also alleges that she was eventually allowed leave when some of her friends arrived on the scene.

A complaint was made to the Gardai in early 2020 regarding that incident.
Following a Garda investigation, charges were brought against a number of males allegedly involved.

Both were among a group of males arrested and interviewed in August 2020.
However, the applicants claim they were not charged before the District Court with offences arising out of the girl’s complaint until May 2022.

One of the applicants before the High Court on Monday is accused of touching the complainant under her shirt and over her pants.

He has been charged with sexually assaulting the girl, contrary to the 1990 Criminal Law (Rape Amendment) Act.

The second applicant is alleged to have been one of the males that blocked the girl from leaving the place where the incident occurred.

He is charged with false imprisonment contrary to the 1997 Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act.

In their separate High Court judicial review actions against the Director of Public Prosecutions the two males claim they were entitled to a speedy trial, given the alleged offences are said to have occurred when they were both 15 years of age and minors.

It is claimed that because they were both minor when the alleged assault took place, there was an onus on the state authorities to ensure speedy trials.

The 21-month delay between the time of the interview and when they were charged meant that there was no prospect of them being tried before their 18th birthdays, they claim.

Both now are over the age of 18 years and are to be tried as adults before the Circuit Criminal Court.

They have been prejudiced as a result of the delay, their lawyers claim.

In their judicial review actions against the two applicants seek various declarations and orders from the court, including orders preventing their trials from going ahead.

The also seek various declarations including that there has been blameworthy and prosecutorial delay by the DPP, and that they have been unfairly deprived of safeguards under the 2001 Childrens’ Act.

Both seek damages for what they claim were breaches of their constitutional rights to expeditious trials.

The matters both came before Mr Justice Charles Meenan at the High Court on Monday.
The judge granted both applicants permission, on an ex-parte basis, to bring their challenges.

He said that while he was prepared to make orders anonymising the identities of the applicants, but said that any notice parties of the proceedings, the matter could be revisited at a later date.

Both cases will be mentioned before the court in a months’ time.

Author
Aodhan O Faolain