We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Simon Harris was one of the politicians who had a print request refused Grainne Ní Aodha/PA

Dozens of politicians' print requests refused, including 2,000-page document for Simon Harris

Between 2022 and 2024, a total of 125 print jobs were rejected by the Oireachtas for a variety of different reasons.

TDS AND SENATORS have had dozens of print jobs refused by the Oireachtas over the last few years.

Politicians at Leinster House are entitled to have tens of thousands of items printed for free every year to help promote their work.

However, a strict policy is in place that covers only “parliamentary duties” and not material related to elections, political parties, or fellow candidates.

Between 2022 and 2024, a total of 125 print jobs were rejected by the Oireachtas for a variety of different reasons.

Records released under FOI show that Fianna Fáil were behind more than half the refused batches – 67 in total.

Fine Gael had 22 print jobs refused, Labour 11 and Sinn Féin 8; there were also lower numbers recorded for other smaller groupings or Independents.

High-profile political figures were among those who had printing rejected with three jobs refused for Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers.

Little detail was provided on the reasons why, with Oireachtas records simply saying they were not in line with the “service level agreement.”

Both Tánaiste Simon Harris and Justice Minister Jim O’Callaghan had a single print job refused.

Harris’ 2,000-page-print job was rejected as outside the bounds of the “service level agreement” while Mr O’Callaghan’s newsletter was declined due to “overtelectioneering.”

Former Taoiseach Leo Varadkar also had a 5,000-batch constituency update refused during 2023 – it was simply marked “rejected” in the Oireachtas files with no further information provided.

There were other reasons for refusal too with one newsletter denied because it breached rules about the promotion of a business.

A note said this was based on: “Material which is or could be construed as being related to or promoting a private commercial endeavour, for example a newsletter which promotes, whether directly or indirectly, a company, business or product.”

Another was refused because it was considered to be promotion of a political party.

It said that was covered by rules covering a ban on “political party/independent members’ corporate material e.g. headquarter type printing, such as application forms for party membership; material which is either directly or indirectly aimed at party fundraising; information notes to party members.”

Other jobs were rejected for more banal reasons including faulty file types, defective documents, and one case where a senator exceeded their monthly printing allowance.

One job for a batch of 1,500 printed leaflets was refused because it contained information on an upcoming referendum.

A note on the file said: “It is the responsibility of the members and qualifying political parties to ensure that items printed in the printing facility that could be said to be designed to influence voters on how to vote in a Referendum are not distributed after the passage of a [bill].”

Fianna Fáil’s John Lahart, who had four separate jobs refused, said: “I don’t remember the specific ones offhand, but it often relates to materials about councillors.

“We have had generic material sent back and generally where that might be about the Fianna Fáil team in our area and they would have come back and said that wasn’t allowed.”

Under Leinster House’s printing policy, jobs can also be declined where they have information that could be considered a crime or encouraging others to commit a crime.
However, there were no refusals under that section according to the documents that were released.

Asked about the records, the Oireachtas said it had no further comment to make.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
View 26 comments
Close
26 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds