Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
TONIGHT, OR IN the early hours of tomorrow morning for those of us in Ireland, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris will go head-to-head on a debate stage for the first time.
It may also be the only time the two clash before US voters go to the polls on 5 November.
For the time being, no additional debates are scheduled and this may be the only time the public gets to see former US President Trump go toe-to-toe with current Vice President Harris.
“This debate may go down in the history books. Break out the popcorn,” said Andrew Koneschusky, a former press secretary for US Senate leader Chuck Schumer.
When and where is the debate?
The debate is being hosted by ABC News, and will also be available to stream on Disney+.
Channel 4 is also carrying live coverage of the debate, which will be held in the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia at 9pm Eastern time tonight, or 2am on Wednesday morning in Ireland.
ABC’s World News Tonight host David Muir and ABC News Live Prime anchor Linsey Davis will be the moderators.
What rules are in place?
There had been much debate in the run-up to the debate on whether the candidate’s microphones would be muted when they are not speaking.
There will be no opening statements and both Trump and Harris will be allotted two-minutes to answer moderator questions, two-minutes for rebuttals, and one extra minute for follow-ups, clarifications, or responses.
For the first debate in June, it was Joe Biden’s team that asked for the microphones to muted while it was the other candidates’ time to speak.
However, Harris’s team wanted that rule to be overturned and some sources from within her camp feel she could be “handcuffed” by the rules set in place by Biden.
In a letter to ABC which was viewed by Politico, Harris’ senior adviser for communications Brian Fallon said the muted mics “will serve to shield Donald Trump from direct exchanges with the Vice President”.
Harris is a former courtroom prosecutor and it’s thought she had been hoping to use this background to cross-examine Trump or to shut him down if he tried to interrupt, something the muted mics prohibit.
Harris deployed this to full effect when Mike Pence tried to cut her off during their 2020 vice-presidential debate.
She memorably shot Pence a look and said: “Mr. Vice President, I’m speaking.”
“I don’t know if I’ve ever heard that before in the debates and the rules of the debates.”
Meanwhile, there will be no live audience and the debate will run for 90 minutes, with two ad breaks.
No props or pre-written notes are allowed and candidates will not be allowed to interact with campaign staff during the ad breaks.
Advertisement
Trump won a coin toss prior to the debate and will deliver the last closing statement, while Harris chose to be placed behind the right podium position on screen.
What have both sides been doing in the run-up to the debate?
On Saturday, Trump delivered a dark speech to a rally in the US swing state of Wisconsin, while Harris hunkered down in another crucial battleground, Pennsylvania, preparing for next week’s televised presidential debate.
At the rally in Mosinee, Wisconsin, Trump delivered his characteristic stream of insults, exaggerations and outright falsehoods, painting a picture of an apocalyptic America run by a leftist dictatorship – a “rogue regime.”
Later on his Truth Social platform, he again falsely asserted that his 2020 loss to Biden involved “cheating” by the Democrats and warned that this time, “WHEN I WIN,” he would ensure “long prison sentences so that this Depravity of Justice does not happen again.”
Trump is said to have taken a more relaxed approach ahead of his seventh presidential debate, choosing to arrive in Philadelphia just hours before and keeping his preparations limited.
Harris meanwhile arrived in Philadelphia after five days holed up in a hotel doing intense practise sessions.
One of her aides even reportedly dressed up in a Trump-style boxy suit and long tie so she could get used to unloading her best lines on her opponent.
She took a break on Saturday from days of debate preparation in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, to visit a spice store where she drew a contrast to Trump’s grim tone.
Asked what message she would most like to get across in their debate, she replied: “It’s time to turn the page on the divisiveness. It’s time to bring our country together – chart a new way forward.”
Harris also said she was “honoured” by the recent endorsements of two prominent conservatives, former vice president Dick Cheney and his daughter, former representative Liz Cheney, adding, “It’s important to put country above party.”
Asked if she was ready to face Trump, Harris said simply, “Yes, I am.”
How has each candidate been faring in the polls?
Harris jumped into the race after President Biden quit in July, shortly after a dismal debate performance against Trump.
She rapidly transformed herself from a little-noticed vice president into a serious contender but the polls show she has not made a major breakthrough and it remains a toss-up.
The race is neck-and-neck heading into the debate, according to polls released on Sunday.
A New York Times/Siena poll found that 78-year-old Trump is leading Harris nationally by 48 to 47%, well within the margin of error.
US presidential elections are decided by tallying the results of state-by-state contests, rather than an overall national popular vote, meaning that a tiny handful of swing states typically determine the balance.
The poll found Harris, 59, narrowly ahead in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, and tied in four other swing states: Nevada, Georgia, North Carolina and Arizona.
A CBS News/YouGov poll put Harris ahead by one percentage point in Michigan and Wisconsin and tied in Pennsylvania.
Why is there no third party candidate on stage?
To be on stage, participants had to show they had drawn at least 15% support in four separate national polls.
No third-party candidate was able to clear this hurdle.
Our Political Reporter Jane Matthews will be liveblogging the debate through the night from 1am Irish Time on Wednesday morning.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
140 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
Who actually reports a photo of a woman breastfeeding citing it as obscene or whatever? The people who do that should have their accounts shut, not the women who are only doing the most natural act possible and sharing their experience with others.
Has it ever crossed your mind that maybe we don’t want them to shear???
Sex is also the most natural thing in the world but I wouldn’t do it on a table in McDonalds in front of you.
Aydo – but that’s your own opinion. As far as I’m concerned anyone can have whatever they’re pleased on their facebook pages – i don’t see issue at all.
Breastfeeding is a baby having its lunch. It’s as entitled to eat its lunch as you are. And if you are somehow embarrassed or offended or turned on by the container said baby’s lunch comes in, you really should examine your hang ups. If you don’t like it, don’t look. Would you object to seeing a baby bottle fed? Don’t expect babies to go without just because you have a weird sense of what is sexual or obscene and what is normal.
Thing is, you can set your profile to be private, so that only you or only your friends can see what you post.. So why shouldn’t a mother post these pics if she wants to? Personally I don’t think I would, but not being a mother I am not really qualified to make that statement.
It’s not like they are posting pictures of themselves breast feeding on other peoples walls or joining random groups just to share pictures of them feeding their babies, so what exactly is the problem?
I have a question…why do you need to put pictures of yourself breastfeeding onto facebook in the first place? Yes, it’s a completely natural thing to do but why do you need to show everyone else?
Exactly. And what about the poor kid? Forever more they will be on facebook sucking their mothers tit.
Simple question, do these people put the same pictures in frames at home on the fireplace? On the bedside locker? On the kitchen fridge?? No, didnt think so.
I see your point B but Facebook has changed the way people put up photo’s.
I used to see people put their entire lives on it every week in photos.
No one covers their house is photo’s of their lives as it’s not practical in physical form.
Because it’s a nice picture of you and your baby, maybe?
Because you don’t think it’s something to be hidden or ashamed of?
Because you happened to be feeding your kid when that group shot was taken?
Because 90% of the time all that’s visible is the back of an infant’s head, so what is there to get worked up over?
We are all supposed to support these people but to be honest I’m getting sick of them. It’s all lies when they say breathing feeding is best for your baby. These hippies think they can wip there tits out whenever they want. Well if you do don’t be surprised if people look or stair. Also, don’t tell be breast are not sexual tools to stimulate the opposite sex, they are. Small breasted women can breast feed just as well as large brested women. The fatty tissue in the breast has nothing to do with feeding and all to do with sexual stimulation. So if men look and stair it’s because you have your tip out and he sees that as a sex toy. I simple as that.
LOL whats wrong Matthew!!!!
Its the truth. I’m sick of all this, ram it in your face political correctness, we all have to suffer because some fool read a book and now we all have to accept THERE way of doing things.
Some people are offended by breast feeding …… we all have to accept and understand the feeling of others.
Me, I don’t give a shit what you take out in front of me.
It’s stare, not stair – Alan.
Stairs are for walking from one floor in a building to another, just like breasts are for breastfeeding – not just for sexual gratification…
@Alan Vickery
I’m afraid the scientific literature would disagree with your statement that
“It’s all lies when they say breathing feeding is best for your baby”
For a start, what the hell is breathing feeding? Surely you mean breastfeeding?
Although, judging by the rest of your statement perhaps you had difficulty typing the word as it may cause you to get aroused..
If you get so distracted by breasts that you feel the need to stare at them, then you are a prime example of why many Muslim women choose to wear the hijab. Because in Islam it is implied that men are really sex obsessed animals incapable of controlling their urges when faced with the natural form of a woman.. And they do not deserve to objectify women like that unless they plan on providing for her.
The only reason anyone has an issue with breast feeding in public is because of the Church playing the shame game, and why should we ever have taken a lead from those hypocrites?
As for the “hippies” comment, what on earth is wrong with you? When a breast feeding mother is out and her child gets hungry her breasts start expressing milk whether there’s a baby hooked on or not. They are encouraged to breast feed by the healthcare professionals in the maternity hospital. Are you saying they should suspend the laws of nature to avoid making you take responsibility for your boner?
Why Thank you Alan for your ad hominem attacks which I recieved in email but appear to have been deleted from here..
So insulting me personally makes your argument for you does it?
FYI I know all about the issues surrounding medical research, which is why I would be more inclined to refer to the meta analyses and epidemiological research rather than marketing from the dairy council, but hey.. Make all the assumptions you like!
And if a woman is deficient yes – so too will her breast milk be (although most mothers do make an effort when pregnant to make sure they don’t end up deficient but I see your point).. The formula on the other hand is devoid of antibodies, and is most frequently made using synthetic nutrients which the body cant utilise and soy which is fast becoming one of the worlds biggest allergens next to cows milk and wheat..
I’m within my rights to take offence to what you said to me, but there’s no point.. You are a stranger and your opinion of me is really of no consequence. And me being offended makes no difference to you or anyone else..
Let this chap explain it for you:
Cheers Conor, and believe me I won’t.. As I said here already, what’s the point in taking offence? Let him say whatever he wants, let him call me names and make juvenile statements all he likes.. He has the right to freedom of speech after all :)
Jeez Alan. What are you on? What’s breast-feeding got to do with sex? Or political correctness. It’s just someone feeding their baby. Usually discretely. Do you know how bizarre this issue can get? A woman in the US (Florida, I think) was breast-feeding in her car outside a strip joint. She was told to stop by police…
First of all Shanti
With relation to the insults, I was responding to insults already sent in my direction by you. If your going to dish it out you have to also be able to take it.
My point with breast feeding is quite simple. you can put pics up on facebook if you want, you can breast feed anywhere you want. BUT and its a big BUT. If you are offending people in the process then you need to take there feeling on the issue into consideration. If you don’t then your not breast feeding because the baby is hungry, your doing it to rise a reaction. Its as simple as that.
Conor Farrell,
Your comments are typical of the small minded people making comments every day on the internet. If I disagree with you then I’m a fool, if I keep disagreeing with you then I’m trolling. As for hiding back under the bridge. Sorry but that’s impossible as you are already occupying that spot.
Michael,
I am not speaking for or advocating for anyone.
If you are offending others while out in public then you need to take there feeling into consideration. If on the other hand you are in private then the other person can leave.
The same applies to your FB account. If you don’t like the picture then don’t look at it.
Why some people have a problem with that is beyond me.
Alan ur original post was offensive and sexist. A woman has a right to feed her child whenever and wherever is necessary. She is protected by law from.harassment from the public and from being asked to stop, leave or move by anyone. If you post offensive remarks then expect a response. A tip for future, before you get offended by a woman with her boob out and a child stuck onto it, get informed. She has a right to do it BY LAW.
Well, Alan. If it’s a principled stance you’re taking, what if the breast-feeding woman and the ten friends in her company are offended by those who are offended by breast-feeding in public?
Also, Alan. If you live in a town or city, you can be sure you walk past a woman breastfeeding her child a couple of times a day. But do you notice? No. Believe it or not, mothers don’t go around topless with babies hanging off them. It’s done pretty discretely. So don’t worry your little head about it.
Niamh,
As I have said before, which you have not noticed, I have no problem with a women breast feeding. I do have a problem with making a statement while breast feeding. This seems to have gone over the head of a lot of people on this topic. They are way to busy to pick out words and focus on them rather then the overall view, which I might add I’m entitled to have.
You mentioned they have a right to breast feed without harassment and your right. But other people also have a right to enjoy there environment without harassment.
If you are breast feeding discretely in public then most people will have no problem with that. If you are screaming look at me (metaphorically speaking) while you are doing it then expect people to be offended.
So its babies stuck onto visible boobies that freak you out? Is it that the boobs are visible? Bet ya if it was a woman sitting having a cup coffee with her boobs out you wouldnt be offended, bet you would think….thats great, fair play to her, wish more women would get their tits out! Snigger, and you would probably have a good stair (sic). But because the boob is doing what nature intended it suddenly
offends you. as I said, you will have to keep ur mouth shut if you are ever in the situation where heaven forfend a woman gets her boob out to feed her child because if you tell her ur offended and ask her to stop you will be breaking the law.
Niamh,
You might want to read my previous post again as you clearly haven’t read it all. You have just highlighted my point about not reading the post’s but grabbing at words.
Deirdre,
I agree, the fact that the posts are not being read is quite embarrassing.
Now now alan, you starred.quitte clearly that boobs are fine as long as they are there fire what.they.are meant for….in ur mind ur own sexual gratification. You als dispute the FACT that breast feeding is best for both mother and baby. You state that these hippies think they can whip their tits out whever they like. Now.it sounds to me that you have a multitude of issues that you need to worth through primarily that you are sexist and you have a problem putting boobs together with feeding.
Niamh,
First of all,
Point out on my post where I said I think they are only for sexual gratification.
I dispute the fact that breast feeding is best for baby, and for very good reason.
OK lets change the word hippy to Militant?
As for my multitude of issues….. I think you’ve been watching to much Jeremy Kyle. Now on to the sexist issue. I can give you 10 reasons why you are more sexist then I am. That’s for another topic.
And finally if you can’t comprehended a simple topic post in its entirety then please stop replying to them.
Have you been harrassed much by statement making breastfeeding women? LOL
The other day there was an article about women protesting with their boobs out at Davos. These women were very angry and making a big statement yet no one seemed to be offended by them. In fact a lot of the posters agreed that there needed to be more pictures. Why then do women who breastfeed need to defend themselves so much. And they do, Alan.. posts like yours make that clear.
I’ve read your posts. You feel the sensibilities of people who are offended by breastfeeding need to be protected over those of the mother and child. You believe that boobs are primarily a means of titillation and people should be protected from being aroused by them.
Alan..
I made comments in reference to what you SAID, that were obviously related to your comments – this might explain why my comment was not removed, and yours was.
My comments were made in jest, making jokes about you not being able to control yourself – see above, none of it was definitive, all based on the “if this is the case” whereas “Shiti Om
Your now a certified ass hole.” Is very much direct to me, and a deliberate attempt to offend.
I asked questions, whereas you made direct attacks.. I’m afraid that’s just how the English language works, I didn’t set out to offend you, just point out the lunacy of your comment.
You also made some inflammatory remarks about a religious belief system or two that may have forced the Journal to delete your longer comment. I am not foolish enough to attempt to repeat them.
Why should I “take” anything, I didn’t “dish it out” to start with, you just got a tad defensive.. Like offence, it’s all in your head..
And back to that point about offence..
What does offence DO? Does it hurt? Cause car accidents? Cancer? Death?
No. It’s all in the person who is taking offences head. And as such, it’s their problem and their problem alone. There’s nothing that says you have a right not to be offended, it would be too difficult to legislate.. You do have a right not to suffer persecution because of your beliefs – but that doesn’t cover taking offence to things, it’s quite different. As pointed out already – one person may be offended by breastfeeding while the next may be offended by people who object to breast feeding..
It’s totally subjective, it only exists in your head. Ergo, if you are offended, the only person who can fix it is you, not the big bad nanny state.. Note, I said I didn’t mind your statement, nor did I report it, I think you have a right to say whatever you want. I’m an adult, I realise that in the grand scheme of things to take offence is just letting you have more control over my emotions than you deserve. That and to resort to name calling really only makes one look childish.
Lastly, how can one “make a statement” by breast feeding, please explain.. Do they loudly announce “Right everyone, I’m about to hook on if you’d like to take your seats – it’s feeding time at the teat!”, perhaps they do it in the middle of the road holding up traffic? I honestly don’t know what you mean by this statement, so please, set me straight..
Alan.the more I think about ur original post the more I get the creeps. I won’t be responding to you any more. Hope you don’t get offended (or aroused) by some woman sticking her boob in ur face any time soon.
Deidre lol. ;)
all this sex talk is silly.. breast feeding a child is natural but whats annoying me here on the topic is you are comparing sex to feeding a hungry child. BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BOTH
Yep and comparing the two is where the problem lies. A human baby is designed to process human milk, a calf is designed to process views milk. In my mind it is unnatural to feed a baby views milk. I dint have issues with people who bottle feed but I support women who breastfeed, especially in this country where it is wierd. If a man, gets sexual pleasure out if looking at a woman breastfeed then clearly he has issues and needs to grow up. Perhaps he has boob envy.
Well said !
Im not offended by breast feeding
But I don’t see the point of wanting to post photos of it on Facebook
But if people do post them that’s their choice
I think what they are missing is that Facebook have rules regarding photo content I don’t think Facebook are against breast feeding, and when they joined Facebook they would have seen these rules
@EMD ” I can assure you some of my best friends breast feed” and to think I thought you were boring when in fact you are hilarious! ( you are being funny I hope).As for ” vitriol” I think you are a little dramatic there or else still confused and finally my apologies for my use of obscenities such as ” chakras ” and ” chamomile tea” there was no intent to offend your sensibilites.
Nicely put Boystork.. Those who get such a bee in their bonnets about seeing a woman breast feed show how juvenile they are by reducing it down to sex and trying to compare breast feeding to sex or defacation.
“ooh, boobies, tee heehee *blush*” what age are these people?
My sister in law started breast feeding opposite me in a branch of Costa Coffee one day. I didn’t want to be looking at it so I looked away, or maintained eye contact. It was MY problem that I felt uncomfortable seeing it, not hers. And as its MY problem, then I should be the one to deal with it, not the mother who is merely fulfilling her duties to her hungry child!!
How can so many people here be so ignorant of what breastfeeding is???
What can be more natural than a mother feeding her child with the absolute best possible, food available.
Reading some of the comments, I can see that there is dire need for information and education on the subject, and Facebook is as good a place as any for those who want more information.
Yep. Michael you reaffirm my faith in man. The problem is that the boobs are classed as obscene images on facebook, but there is a difference between a photo of someone getting her tits out and someone feeding her baby. I personally wouldn’t post pictures of me breastfeeding on the internet but I do know women who have and it doesn’t look odd or obscene, just looks like someone feeding her child, didn’t make me want to barf.
I’ve no objection to breastfeeding images, cant quite see what the fuss is, but the whole “it’s natural” argument is a bit lame as it also holds for many other human activities rarely depicted (e.g. micturation defecation, menstruation etc etc)
Jim do you think eating and defecation are the same thing? Because I will tel you in case you are confused, they aren’t. The clue is in the word breast FEEDING.
@Alison, you come across as incredibly patronising, negative and ill-informed in your comments on this story. Why are you so against a woman’s choice to breastfeed her baby, take a picture (as one does of ones infant) because you think it is cute and share it with friends/family on Facebook? Also why all the negative and derogatory comments about women who chose to breastfeed?
As for the majority of others who seem to have a problem with someone feeding their child, what the fook is wrong with you? Topless on the beach is fine but producing milk for human young suddenly means exposure is disgusting? The woman on the Luas @Diego, did she wave her boob about and flash signs saying look at me I’m feeding my baby or perhaps she latched her baby on and you were aware she was feeding and saw some exposed flesh? I mean seriously people you need to grow up and get over this, worse body parts are seen regularly in public (muffin top anyone?) daily and do you feel you have the right to tell them to put it away? At least breast feeding is healthy for mum and baby while muffin top is an indicator that more healthy eating and activity is required. I cannot bear this attitude to breastfeeding in Ireland, anyway it is a legal right in Ireland for women to be allowed to breastfeed in any public place without being asked to stop http://www.breastfeeding.ie/breastfeeding_out_and_about
@EMD , how dare you? As I have stated previously I have no issue with breast feeding in public or private and I have made no comments regarding any woman’s choice to do so and I have NOT commented on anybody’s right to post photos of this if they wish to do so.I think you are the person who is ill informed or confused and in fact you come across as someone I have no wish to have no further exchanges with so pick someone else to bore!
What is with you? You have lambasted everyone who has dared to query your responses to this story.You say haven’t commented on someone’s right to post a breastfeeding picture, if not then why not? This story is not about breast vs bottle but about breastfeeding women protesting their right to post pictures of themselves feeding their children. You also have referred to people as being patronising, breastappo etc. made comments about chakras and chamomile tea in a patronising manner so why on earth shouldn’t I dare to question your reasons for such unnecessary negativity. I can assure you that I am perfectly well informed on this subject having breastfed three children and I am as entitled to my opinion on this subject as you are so if you are bored I suggest you don’t read my posts.
Truly no need for such vitriol at all to me or to other posters on here. I can assure you some of my best friends bottlefeed ;-)
If it had a bottle in its mouth no one would bat an eyelid. This world is so backwards, and the backwards comments about breastfeeding make me despair.
It is just a breast feeding a baby, get over yourselves, women should not be made feel in any way bad for FEEDING their child. I get offended when I see a baby being bottle fed, but, I respect a mothers right to choose. Alot of mothers however do not make an informed choice cos formula is pushed down their necks from the time they go to their first pregnancy appointment. Formula is a million miles away from breastmilk. Do you think the child would choose cows milk? Breastfeeding will never be seen for what it is, NORMAL, until more people breastfeed in public and facebook should be ashamed of themselves for deleting these beautiful pictures.
If you dont want to look, put a blanket over your head.
First things first. Cows milk is for baby cows, its not designed for humans. And can actually cause health problems (we are the only animals on the planet that continue to consume milk after weaning. Despite the fact that we lose the enzymes to break down lactose after the age if 3 because by then we should be weaned!!)
Giving cows milk to a baby who’s digestive system is still forming and has not quite got all their gut flora in place has been linked to diabetes mellulitis.
There’s a protein in cows milk that is identical in structure to the islets of langerhans in the pancreas (which make insulin). The child is given cows milk, the protein passes through the gut wall undigested and triggers an autoimmune response. Sadly while destroying the foreign protein of the cows milk, the immune system also destroys the child’s ability to make insulin..
Yeah.. I’d give my kid cows milk rather than the milk it was designed to drink alright..
It saddens me to read such ignorance out there. So many informed people have tried to address ridiculous comments on here, delighted to say both male and female.
But mostly it saddens me that we who choose to breastfeed are put in a position to constantly defend and explain ourselves. This just convinces some that we are an arguementive group. But, if you see some of the attitudes expressed here today you can see why we need to be an assertive bunch!
Maybe if those with negative views could inform themselves a bit better all women would feel empowered to make the choice. I felt sad to see a woman felt uncomfortable feeding in front of friends and family, you are missing out on the convenience of bf.
We don’t want to protest, we don’t want to defend our choice, we just want to feed our babies. If fb censor these pics we are allowing ignorance to prevail and perpetuate a lie that feeding your baby is indecent.
i’m a breastfeeding mum, I do not fed in public as my son tends to move around a lot when i’m feeding and I would hate to get exposed. I would never dream of posting a pic of me feeding my son that is a private moment between my son and I. even when someone calls to my house I will ask do they mind if I feed as some people are uncomfortable with it and if they are uncomfortable the will go into another room, generally most people are ok with it and it is getting better but breastfeeding mums also need to not be so offended bout everything when it comes to how other people feel about breastfeeding
Is this ur first child? There is a breastfeeding blanket you can get, its great for those awkward moments when you HAVE to feed in public. You have.nothing to feel awkward.about, has anyone asked you if you mind if they bottle feed their baby in your presence? Well why.should breastfeeding be any different, you are doing the same thing. Fair play to you and best of.luck.
@ niamh this is baby number 3 my others fed great this little man has colic and reflux so he moves around a lot during feds he pulls on the blankets, and i’m a private person and would not like to be exposed while feeding.
@Briewee you have a sensible approach towards breastfeeding as you consider it a private act but some women take a very militant approach hence the emergence of the term ” breastappo” !
@alison,
Why does it need to be private to be sensible?
Do you think before the church came and “civilised” us it was considered shameful to breast feed? Do you think a woman should not breast feed in public? If you went out and hung around with indigenous tribes people not only would they breast feed with no shame many of them would walk around all day with their breasts hanging out – it would only be considered “offensive” in our part of the world because these supposed societal norms were inflicted upon us by a gang of religious zealots.
Please fill me in, I am having difficulty understanding your resentment for a woman’s right to feed her child as nature intended when and where the need arises.
Allison, statements like that are unhelpful and counterproductive, and its disappointing that it came from a woman. Some people just feel strongly about it and it its always going to new one of the issues that is controversial but we should be together on it rather than get at one another. Mutual respect. In saying that I would definitely advocate breastfeeding but I respect each womans choice. The problem is the stigma attached to breastfeeding in public.
@Shanti, wow you got all that out of my comment,I am glad you used the word “zealot” because that’s exactly I was thinking about your input on this topic.If you can bring the church into this that is entirely your own issue, I think you need to relax and chill out a little, I am exhausted from reading your rant , imagine what all that negativity is doing to you!
What negativity Alison? I am merely putting forth a logical argument..
You are the one using terms like “breastappo” and inferring that somehow to breast feed in public is not “sensible”.
I merely broke your “sensibilities” down to their origins. There should be no shame in breast feeding, no need for it to be hidden away, these ideals come from the church, if you take issue with me bringing facts into the debate then I am afraid that is your issue and not mine.
@Niamh, so disappointed that you’re disappointed! I have no problem with anybody who breast feeds in public or private but I do think people are coming across as very militant and sanctimonious with their comments re the whole topic and also more than a tad patronising.However, all that aside have a nice evening!
Funnily enough Alison, I’d have thought that last comment there about the disappointment was rather patronising, but as its in text, and devoid of tone, Ill refrain from impressing my assumptions on you :)
Ah now, is there really any need for you to go making a hypocrite of yourself by trying to pick holes in my grammar (and ignoring that it may be as a result of autocorrect)?
And who said anything about trying to impress you? I said I would not impress on you, which means something else altogether..
I’m a breastfeeding mum, but I express for when we’re going out or expecting visitors. Expressing takes no time at all, and I would never be so ignorant to expect others to just deal with it if I was to feed in public. This whole debate is becoming tiresome now. more and more women are suddenly deciding to share bf’ing pics, then crying when theyre removed and now running to the local press. There are more important. things happening in the world
Louise you are very lucky that expressing works for you, not everyone is so lucky and secondly why on earth would you express if you have visitors coming?? Its ur house. But mostly why would you feel embarrassed…you are only feeding ur child?
Louise I hate to sound negative but I think it is madness to go to all that effort when you can just feed the baby using your breast. No bottles/pump to clean and sterilise, I hated pumping myself because it took ages, required a lot of fuss and seemed pointless if I was with the baby anyway. I would expect people to just deal with it if I was feeding, how do they deal with bottlefeeding then? It can’t be ok to feed your baby in public with a bottle but not with a breast.Just my opinion of course and each to their own but I certainly don’t think discussing the need for promotion of breastfeeding is tiresome and while the Facebook photo thing is not that important to me in the greater scheme of things it does irk me that bare breast for feeding is equated to inappropriate nudity shots. Big difference between the two!
Absolutely. Look, put what you want on the internet. Put photos of you performing penetrative sex with a dolphin if that’s your thing. Just remember that Facebook is not your website and they do have a say about what goes up.
I don’t think this really falls under the category of women’s rights or anything like that. It’s just a silly gripe about a grey area. It really comes down to how awkward it is to see breast feeding photos in friends’ photo albums.. “There you are there Mildred… doing that.”
Only Facebook said they have no problem with these photos being put up, that they support these women – I think the issue is more that Facebook are saying one thing and doing the opposite than the breast feeding itself..
B7584 in matter of fact yes i have a picture feeding my children in my living room. because they fool of love and sweetness. do you not have picrture of you eating in reastaurant or with friend ?
Hey, dont feel sorry for me, I have three healthy breastfed children. Its the poor mums in underdeveloped countries who lose children every day to malnutrition and disease I feel for. I bet they wish having pics removed from a social networking site was their only concern at the minute
Louise it is of.course a first world problem. But just because babies die because of malnutrition in the third world does noir mean we can’t have thais discussion. If ur visitors can’t respect and applaud you defying ur baby them thats their issue. I would be a bit funny about feeding in front of some men (especially sheree reading some of the stuff here) but if end don’t do it, breastfeeding will never be the norm or acceptable in public.
Where did I say ‘too embarrassed’? My reasons were out of ‘respect’. Maybe you should read over my comment again, and also quit the bullying towards those who do not share the same opinion, and maybe also put your efforts towards a more worthy cause.
Louise you are dead right !!! This breast feeding lark is so so tiresome ! I choose not to breastfeed because simply I did not want to ! Fair play to anybody who dose breastfeed but more so FairPlay to those who breastfeed and don’t ram it down every woman’s throat who simply do not want to breastfeed ! Pat yourself on the back Louise you seem like a normal breastfeeding mom :0)
Joanne, no one is questioning the choice not to breastfeed but the choice to breastfeed is constantly questioned in Ireland. Whilst I do not wish to “ram” my choice down anyone’s throat I do take umbrage at comments on here describing breastfeeding as tiresome or disrespectful. Breastfeeding is a method of feeding babies and should not be associated with anything remotely sexual and certainly not equated to human bodily functions. If you were on the Luas with your baby and he/she was hungry would you force them to wait or would you give them a bottle if you had one with you? I think it is sad that people respond so badly to something as simple as a baby being fed and that we as women are expected not to respond to our baby’s needs so as to be respectful of others hang ups. Why should we pump milk from the sterile and perfectly temperature controlled breast into a bottle because it suits others, why shouldn’t we feed baby in public whenever or wherever he needs to be fed? Whatever people’s opinions on this matter the law supports the breastfeeding mother and her right to feed in public wherever she chooses!
Anyway as said before this is not breast vs bottle this is about breastfeeding photos being removed by Facebook as in certain instances they are seen as nudity which seems ridiculous in my opinion, will they remove photos of babies with bottles?
How many abnormal breastffeding mams have you met joanne? why do some women who bottle feed get so defensive about breastfeeding, don’t want to cast aspersions on you joanne but I think.that a lot of it is resentment and guilt. As I said I dont think this is a breast versus bottle debate, I respect choice but I support brestfeeding. There is too much stigma associated with using ur boobs to feed ur child. But breastfeeding in public use protected by law so a woman is entitled to feed her child without harassment from the public, without being asked to stop, leave or move. It is exactly because of the attitude that oooh that woman is using her boob to feed her child that women are made to feel there is something wrong with it’s do you think there a cow iis ramming it diwn ur thriat when she feeds her calf in front of you? this prudish attitude is engrained in ireland. Get informed.
Respect for who??? Its not for your child anyways. You are infringing on my right to breastfeed in public by making it seem like I dont have respect for others by merely partaking in the act of feeding my child. Grow up.
Had you been aware that synthetic vitamin isolates and sodium bound minerals were not as nutritious for your baby, would you have chose the formula?
Regardless of the breast v bottle debate, this is something most people don’t know..
There’s the form of vitamin you find in food (food form) and there’s the chemical copy that was tweaked just enough for the drug company to secure a patent. They might call it a vitamin, but in reality it’s a man made chemical pretending to be a vitamin..
Your body isn’t that stupid.. It cannot utilise it effectively.
For example – vitamin E.
D-alpha tocopherol is what you get from olive oil, nuts, seeds etc. It keeps blood viscous, protects the hormones, helps the immune system, muscle elasticity, skin etc.
DL-alpha tocopherol is man made, it is not absorbed as well, and has been linked to health problems including prostate cancer, this is what’s in baby formulas.
So, had you had that information available to you, would you have made the same choice?
Well done Niamh and Cam. Focus, the issue is the censorship of bf images on fb. For those who are baffled as to why those pics are posted… I’m sure the reasons are many, cute pic, baby happened to be hungry, sites which promote bf, a desire by bf mothers to normalise the image(cos it is normal), pride…
Ok.. Here’s what I really don’t get, and no one else seems to have picked up on..
It’s perfectly ok for a young teenage girl to be posting pictures of herself in her underwear in provocative poses, but not for a woman to have a photo of herself breast feeding?
Surely a child who looks to be below the age of consent, pretty much posing as a porn star is far more offensive and needs to be addressed more than a mother feeding her child as nature intended?
Mind you, as the article said, Facebook claims to have no issue with the breast feeding pics, they just keep suspending because ignorant fools will report it.. Wonder if they’re as quick to report the kiddy porn?
I love BF photos. As a mother who was unable to BF my son I find it empowering to see photos of other mothers succeeding. It gives me hope that next time, I can and WILL succeed.
I find it nearly impossible to understand why so many adults take offense to a woman feeding her child. Ask my 5 year old son why women have breasts and he will tell you, “So that babies can drink milk out of them.” If it was that easy to explain to a child then surely those with an intellect above that of a preschool aged child should be able to understand. It is important for people to see images/women BF in public because if it is not shown then it will never be “normal” by societies standards and women will continue to feel the need to take cover. What is there to be ashamed of when you are feeding your child? If anything you should be ashamed for NOT feeding your child when they are hungry.
Thank you @Shanti Om for pointing out that though one might not be comfortable with looking/watching a mother, it doesn’t mean you have any right to ridicule her for simply performing her duties as a mother.
FYI to all of you who are talking about crying babies, CRYING IS A VERY LATE SIGN OF HUNGER. If a baby is crying to be fed, it is STARVING. Breast milk is digested very quickly (less than 60 minutes in some cases) and if you expect a mother to carry that many supplemented bottles with her when she is out, then I suggest that you carry her bag for her. That would be unnecessarily heavy when she is already expected to do so much more.
Hey Amber Nicole, thank you for your comment, really all I was trying to do was inject a bit of logic into the conversation!
I am sorry to hear you were unable to feed, that happened to my sister with her first child (she was delivered by caesarian and so the oxytocin didn’t kick start the prolactin and the milk just wouldn’t come).
If its any consolation, my sister was told after this that because of complications during the procedure she would never have another child, and she went on to have 4 more, and what’s more, she breastfed them all.
There is hope. There is always hope, you will get to have your chance, maybe on your next child. I know that fennel has certain oestrogenic compounds in it that are in herbal medicine used to stimulate milk production.. Perhaps see if you can get to speak to a nutritional therapist (BANT or IINH affiliated) in your area, that is if you are in Ireland, when you are thinking of conceiving next for far more help than I could ever try and offer online..
It will happen. Keep focused upon what you want, and forget the anxieties of failure.
The very best of luck to you, not that you need it – just as a gesture :)
Its not a case of no like no look its a case of respect other peoples space andif yo want to breastfeed do so in a dignified manner as as one intelligent girl stated she made allowances and expressed breastmilk be fore going out to feed the baby, also a lot of the comments made see to have an underlying link between breastfeeding and sex !!!!! Weird , the fats are as stated Girls please dont whip those puppies out in full view of the non paying public , if i want to see a very nice pair i can go home at any time and enjoy, so respect others and make allowances when you go out. !!!!Capice
why on earth would anyone want to post photos of them breastfeeding their kids? and who , honestly appreciates looking at others breastfeeding? some people post their whole lives on the thing, something i can’t understand. discretion is as much a part of being human as breastfeeding.
Well its amazing that a protest is organised over the deletion of some photos and yet we sit on our backsides whilst the government screw this country up. Perhaps we then deserve it if our priorities are to post photos of our children breastfeeding instead of fighting for our children’s future in this country. As it stands my son will inherit the rest of my mortgage, there will be no hospital nearby if Enda Kenny has his way oh and he wasn’t breastfed either (my son, that is, not Enda, though he could’ve been!)
I don’t have any issue with a mother breastfeeding in public but I just can’t get my head around posting a picture of it on Facebook why would ya bother
Advocates of public breast feeding always say that it’s a natural process so there is nothing wrong with it. Well so is taking a $hite – should we all start doing that in public too?
I think that like most issues in life this is a truly personal one and ultimately comes down to your perception of what makes you feel comfortable.
As a mother, I would not feel comfortable posting a picture of me breastfeeding, however I would also not be comfortable with a picture of me in a skimpy bikini on holiday being posted! I know they are different things however it comes down to perception!
Also not sure this should be a breast v bottle debate, there are people quoting breast feeding as the most natural thing in the world and best for babies etc not everyone shares that opinion some people feel cows milk is the best and every mother should be entitled to do what is best by their book, if they are caring for the child in a loving manner!
If you think cows milk is better you may wish to consult the scientific literature.. Breast wins hands down I’m afraid, we are not designed to drink cows milk, and in light of the permanent damage it may cause for anyone to think differently is actually shocking.
Cows milk is designed to bring a 45kg new born calf to roughly 360kg (heifer) in the space of 15 months. It’s not supposed to be consumed by any other species than cows. Personally I drink milk but I wouldn’t give it to a baby who is unable to digest it properly, the fat/calorie content is totally wrong for a baby.
Anyhoo, I find it ridiculous that there’s lads on here giving out about women getting ‘their bits out’ when they’re feeding a child! They’d be perfectly at ease if the same was done without a baby, say at the beach/newspaper/niteclub/football match whatever, I’m sure it would be pwoarr! Check those out! Filthy hypocrites, the only problem they have is that they’re uncomfortable with their favorite playthings being used to feed a child.
Haha Louise, you may have a point!
What I don’t get is why they can’t just look somewhere else? Are they that hard wired and breast obsessed that if there is some even partially on display they HAVE to look at it? I don’t like watching women breast feed, but I can look away.. It doesn’t “offend” me because I have the sense to realise that it is necessary and that the whole societal rejection of public breast feeding is a left over from the shame of being a woman imposed by the church!
And yeah.. Most of those “offended” do seem to be guys, guys I’m sure have no issue with breasts so long as there’s no babies head in the way!
some very patronising and defensive arguments being expressed here ( forgive the pun) by the ” my milk is better than cow’s milk” brigade when this is facebook censorship issue.
Alison, I do agree, but it started as a response to comments suggesting that whenever someone chooses to breast feed based upon the scientific evidence that it is better – that they are somehow lying, or of someone has a belief based on nothing at all that cows milk is safe for infants, never mind better than breast milk, that this should somehow excuse the stigma around breast feeding.
You are totally right, it’s a red herring, but don’t blame those who are trying to set the record straight.
Three healthy children whose mother is too ‘embarrassed’ to breastfeed them in front of friends or family. I despair, I really do. You really need to read this Louise.
Directed to Alan Vickery comment:
Open Quote
“We are all supposed to support these people but to be honest I’m getting sick of them. It’s all lies when they say breathing feeding is best for your baby. These hippies think they can wip there tits out whenever they want. Well if you do don’t be surprised if people look or stair. Also, don’t tell be breast are not sexual tools to stimulate the opposite sex, they are. Small breasted women can breast feed just as well as large brested women. The fatty tissue in the breast has nothing to do with feeding and all to do with sexual stimulation. So if men look and stair it’s because you have your tip out and he sees that as a sex toy. I simple as that.” Close Quote
1.” We are all supposed to support these people but to be honest I’m getting sick of them.”
– What is it Alan specifically are you are sick off? Since you have posted this publicly, I would ask you to clarify what motive either physical / emotional has repulsed you enough to warrant your post. Please be Specific with your response.
2. “It’s all lies when they say breathing feeding is best for your baby.”
- Alan, please provide example of said lies, provided with backed up references to properly submitted and peer review journals etc. – Otherwise – everything you state is subjective and fabricated to provide you with purpose to attack both the law and the rights of women. Again please be specific.
3. “These hippies think they can wip there tits out whenever they want.”..
- Please provide demographic evidence of there social standing and they lifestyles to support that they are “hippies”, again please reference either the CSO stats or other formally recognised statistical providers.
– My response:– My Wife breasts feed our 3 mth old daughter, both her not I are “Hippies” therefore your argument is void, without your providing evidence of such claims.
- Any woman that ‘wips’ out their breasts would find it uncomfortable and sore, I think you mean they are careful unclasping their bra…
- “Whenever they want” – this is usually when a child is hungry which again is necessity rather than want to either flash or expose themselves.
4. “Well if you do don’t be surprised if people look or stair.”
- I don’t think women have any issue with this, they more so have a problem with the prejudice and hate attached to the person(s) who stair.
5. “Also, don’t tell be breast are not sexual tools to stimulate the opposite sex, they are. ” – You will find Alan that breastfeeding and the provision of care to a child was there first long before the use of breast as a means to sexual gratification. Gratification is only held by the person that is in receipt of it not in the woman that is feeding their child.
-Additionally, Alan you find that breastfeeding mothers has never made any plea that they are not, but in a modern and educated society, one would come to expect that you (not personally, but men / women in general) can control and respect another persons rights. This is why we such things as the Equal Status Act 2000.
- Are you trying to suggesting that you gratification is being taken away by the presence of a child feeding from a breast? If so, then I can only suggest that if you are having “issues” with gratification that you seek help.
6: “Small breasted women can breast feed just as well as large brested women. The fatty tissue in the breast has nothing to do with feeding and all to do with sexual stimulation. So if men look and stair it’s because you have your tip out and he sees that as a sex toy. I simple as that..” – Alan, can you clarify this, are you suggest that a woman whom is not a slim, and either underweight is not entitled to breast feed – I so this is what bigotry is and unlawful.
- Scientifically Mammary tissue become enlarged either during or after pregnancy and also when lactation for the provision of milk to a child.
- It would appear that you are hurt, offended and tormented with the fact that breasts, either small, large round,, white, brown, yellow or any other race or creed are solely and only there for your gratification. Please, respond with a Yes or No specially to this, as I want to justify the statement.
–If Yes, you agree then your argument this whole time has been a selfish act of resentment to women in general and I would strong suggest you contact your local GP for refer to a sex therapist for counselling.
– If No, please educate me to why you are making this statement and other statements.
———————————————————-
You can respond its my opinion, which is fine, but you opinion if not backed up with justification is in fact an opinion but an attack and a hateful declaration of sexist and criminal prejudice (as it declares you intent to not respect the laws set down in the Equal Status Act).
@shanti I think the tone of your comments could have a negative impact on any mother who has not breast feed – for any reason. We do not need a lesson on the negative impacts of dairy products but thanks for letting us all know anyway…..
@Niamh – totally agree I think breast feeding is still a taboo subject in Ireland and if women choose to do it there should be no issue with it (I personally would not wish photos of myself doing it to be put on facebook though!).
Cam, the only reason I brought it up was because there was some people who appeared to be severely misinformed.
Not only is cows milk not suitable for humans, but to suggest that it is comparable to breast milk for feeding an infant is downright dangerous! Pasteurised cows milk does not contain any vitamins, enzymes or antibodies (pasteurisation kills them), it is also a woeful source of Iron (a baby would need to drink several gallons of cows milk a day to get sufficient iron), it does however contain white blood cells and pus from the cows, as well as whatever antibiotics used on the cow.
This inhibits the formation of the gut flora, as antibiotics kill friendly bacteria along with bad.
I have no idea what you are trying to imply about my tone and mothers who have not breasted, I am merely speaking as someone who has studied human nutrition and wishes to see the correct information backed up by scientific evidence, given.
Besides, even the doctors in the hospital will tell you no cows milk until after 6 months.. Before then they may suggest formula as an alternative, but they are supposed to tell you NOT to give cows milk during that period. For the many health reasons cited in med journals..
Have you seen who are holding this demo? the Breastfeeding Manifesto Coalision….. I mean really… do they nothing better to do with their time? I am thinking about starting the Coalision of Citizens to Eat Tree Bark for Sport and Charity Union if anyone wants to join a real niche action group for stuff that no one else really cares about what we do or don’t do
Hi Jay, thanks for the comment.
Just to clarify that the Breastfeeding Manifesto Coalition is NOT holding this demonstration – the photograph used is a file photo to illustrate breastfeeding, rather than that group itself. That may not have been clear so I’ve changed the caption on the image.
Cheers,
Jennifer
I don’t think it’s a case about breast feeding being natural but about some people having no respect for others around them. I was on the luas two weeks ago and a man, women and baby got on at jervis. I couldn’t believe what she done next….. out with the boob, standing up, on a packed luas and starts feeding the baby. In certain situations as mentioned above, people should cop on.
I think the issue is that nobody gave her a seat? When a baby is hungry they don’t.care where they are. Which would you have preferred a screaming baby or a baby bring fed? Still can’t believe no one have her a seat. Jesus christ, are we that bad?
About he seat yea I totally agree with you. I never sit on the luas because I’m well able to stand and other people aren’t so lucky.
About the baby being hungry, it can wait a few minutes. I think it’s just a lack of respect in such close proximity to others. The luas was that packed if you were close by and took offence to it you had to get off, how is that fair on them? I didn’t take any offence to it but I thought it was a bit mad.
Diego I have been in situations where I had to feed my babies in public and believe me I wished they could wait but they can’t. When you know all the baby.needs is feeding and that is the.opportune moment you have take it. The woman had probably already delayed as she knew the luas was coming and waited to feed the baby on it. I’m still am shocked nobody gave her a seat.
With regards people copping on, yeah Deigo and Alan, you should..
Would you rather she stand on the Luas with a crying baby and big wet patches on her clothes where her nipples are? Personally I’d find that more offensive.
But on the subject of “offence”, what the hell does it matter if you’re offended? Nothing happens, it’s not going to cause you pain to be offended.. It’s an entirely subjective thing too – I’m offended by the ignoramus comments and referring to breast feeding as “whipping the tits out”, but it doesn’t change anything. Being offended is just about your own personal perceptions of things, and should not impinge on the rights of others, you have no right to expect not to be offended, wheras that mother has every right to breast feed her child wherever necessity dictates!
If you don’t wanna see it, don’t look. Same way if a movie offends you you dont go to go see it in the cinema..
But as for you being offended, great, be offended.. I’m sure it’s not terminal :)
Alan I didn’t respond to ur comment earlier as I thought you were being smart but after reading ur questionable response to shanti above I realise that.you genuinely think that pumping is an option. Because you are a man you will have no idea of the difficulties of pumping, it is extremelyt frustrating and time consuming for little and sometimes no return. Your body knows that the pump ours not ur baby and this affects ur let down. Then if you are successful two other problems can occur. The first being ur baby refused the bottle because he/she its used to tune boob our secondly the baby accepts the boyle but you have not expressed enough to satisfy his her hunger so you are back to square one where you have to OFFEND everyone by feeding ur child in public. It appears to me that you have issues about this. Can I politely suggest you get over.it. Its a baby.having milk from a boob….do you feel th same when you see
cow feeding her.calf, do you think there is anything wrong with that? On second thoughts don’t answer that.
Out with the boob?! The very idea! Diego just so you know women are entitled to breastfeed anywhere, anytime under Irish law (Equal Status) and in certain situations as mentioned above, people with discriminatory attitudes should cop on.
I agree with you Cam, right to choose all the way.. But part of making choices is having the relevant information to make an informed decision. The fact that we are not taught basic human nutrition at schools the fault of our education system and no one else. I was merely presenting the facts. My apologies of that caused you offence.
When I am out and about I do not need to see some womans jugs hanging outall over the place , as there are people out there who breastfeed in public and respect the fact that there are others nearby there is also the let it all hang out brigade who want to make some type of mammary gland statement.If you want to feed your baby in public girls respect the wishes of others and do so in a proper manner and for those who cant do this maybe a black bag could do the trick !!!!!!
Exactly tony. I just can’t understand why most people here think its perfectly alright to do it were ever they want. Would they do it in the middle of a funeral?
So guess what Tony, you have an option to NOT LOOK!!
Oh my god, it’s so simple!! I don’t want to watch another woman breast feed, but it’s MY problem, and I have the option to look away..
Although, maybe it’s just a male thing.. I’m capable of NOT looking at breasts because they do not arouse me..
As for “do so in a proper manner” a) what the hell is that supposed to mean and b) you do realise that the baby has a mind of its own and may not fit neatly into your world view? As one lady above pointed out, her child moves around a lot while feeding.. I’m afraid it’s not as simple as your assumptions make it out to be..
And Diego, if the baby was screaming its head off in the church, then yeah – why not?
What I don’t understand is all these people who think taking offence to something means anything..
Like I said before, a mother has a right to feed her child.
You have a right to be offended – you do NOT however have a right to expect the fact you are offended to make a blind bit of difference.
Diego, without being there and in the mothers shoes – who are we to judge? There could be several reasons why she would stay where she was, it could be raining, the church could be packed..
The fact of the matter is, if you don’t wanna see it, you still have the option of y’know, looking the other way??
You’re suggesting a mother should leave the church with her hungry child because you can’t look away? Please..
Well done Aodhinn!!!! Come on Alan lets see what you have to say now!! YOU are the ‘certified asshole’ with no respect for women…. Well done Shanti for all the info.. and well done Niamh, great points made ;).
Thanks rachel, alan is the man who thinks boobs arr just there for a mans sexual pleasure and tries to belittle women if they answer back to him. The word misogynist springs to mind, I thought they were all left behind in the 70′s….but no, alan its very much.alive and kicking 40 years behind the times.
Thanks Rachael! As for Alan, he seems to have crawled back into the hole he came from.. Probably just as well, the breast feeding moms may have one less to “stair” at them eh?
what are you doing so to change what you thing is unfaire ? and maybe this woman who do protest for Facebook do other protest and fight for other cause too.
Shanti
I see calling someone a ” certified ass hole” will not get your post removed, strange that.
With relation to the 3 of you.
Shanti, Deirdre, Niamh
You are 3 immature little girls who got involved in a grown up’s conversation. Not your fault…. as sometimes opinionated feminists can’t help attacking men for having a view or other women (as I have seen you do on this topic Shanti) should they dare have a different view to you.
Shanti
You might call me a ” certified ass hole” for my comments but I think I’m more a fool for trying to get people like you 3 to even remotely understand that other people have views as strong as your.
And with that I end this lovely chat as you are not worth the effort any more.
Ok, Alan,
Seeing as you were nice enough to refer to me more than once, I’ll return the favour..
My issue with your statements to start with were that you were of the mistaken notion that synthetic nutrients or cows milk (the alternatives) or expressed milk (only an option for some) were adequate.
Having studied human nutrition, as well as the scientific evidence (note: evidence, as opposed to single papers with possible conflicts of interest) I took issue with your comments that it was somehow “lying” to say breast milk is the preferrable source of infant nutrition.
I adressed your concerns re: the mothers deficiencies, and I agree mothers should receive good information based upon sound evidence to avoid this.
The next issue I took was with your equation of this act with sex. This is illogical, just because sex, masturbation, urination, menstruation, child birth, breast feeding and defecation are all natural, does not mean that they are all the same. This is the fallacy of division, it is an error of reasoning, it’s like saying that all natural things are safe, when I think the foxglove or gallerina mushroom would beg to differ.
As for me attacking anyone, I think you will find I have not, I have attacked their logic, yes, but them? Had I done so, my comments would have been removed.
The calling me or anyone else an “immature little girl” that is the equivalent of you calling me a “poo poo head”.. It doesn’t make your argument for you, instead, it brings out that rule of “be careful pointing fingers, because you have three more pointing back at you”, it doesn’t “offend” me, but it does make you look bad. Which is precisely why I’m happy for you to make these kinds of comments and will even quote them back to you so you can deliberately misquote me in a vain attempt to make your argument..
Hee hee, wots the bets alan looked at the link? I hope that image is now superimposed in his mind. I know it was a dirty trick but I really couldnt help myself ;)
@Niamh – I totally agree it’s not (and should not be) a breast v bottle debate. However, there are a number of comments which elude to breast being better and as a fellow mother I am saying that not everybody believes that – and fair enough!
It’s Fair enough to believe that cows milk is better, it’s just not fact.
There is belief and evidence. Belief requires one to make a decision in the absence of evidence and the other proves fact.
Cows milk is not good for your baby or even you. All that nonsense about it being good for you is merely marketing from the dairy council. The scientific literature paints a vastly different story linking it with diabetes, asthma, allergies, mucosal ailments, and even cancer..
But yeah.. If you wanna believe that cows milk is better than breast, don’t let the evidence stop you..
Cam, I don’t have issues with bottle feeding but breast milk is scientifically proven to be better. Which is why tter hospitals are now obliged to promote it. I really don’t have issues on bottle feeding but there there is not enough public acceptance of breastfeeding in this country.
I saw some of the comments that were removed in my email notifications.. They were in breach of the comments rules in fairness.. Personal attacks and all..
FYI, I didn’t report you, I wouldn’t. I believe you have a right to say whatever you want, if I get offended, that’s MY problem, and I will deal with it.. Not that I’d bother takin offence to what some randomer on the internet said to me..
In fairness I got ur comment through email too and you members to get a personal attack and a religous attack in one so its not surprising it was deleted. In saying that I didn’t report it either, it takes more than a boob out feeding a child to offend me….unlike some.
Rory McIlroy takes two-shot lead into final round of Masters
3 hrs ago
2.3k
19
The cost of doing business
Central Bank went €3.6m over budget on new data system despite giving reassurances about cost
Stephen McDermott
4 hrs ago
1.6k
Money Laundering
Travel agent and husband caught carrying €340,000 for criminal group at Dublin Airport, court told
12 hrs ago
66.1k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 168 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 113 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 149 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 117 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 84 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 84 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 138 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 63 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 78 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 86 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 49 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 95 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 102 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 73 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 54 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 92 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 72 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say