This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 15 °C Monday 10 August, 2020

Poll: Should graphic videos of terrorist acts be banned?

YouTube and Twitter have been removing footage of James Foley’s execution in Syria.

Image: AP/Press Association Images

THE EXECUTION OF American photojournalist James Foley at the hands of Islamic State terrorists in Syria was filmed and posted online this week.

It was gruesome, and graphic, but watched by millions around the world.

YouTube has been removing the video from its site, and Twitter has said it will ban users who link to it.

Some commentators have said such videos are tools of propaganda for terrorists, others are particularly concerned about the hurt they cause to victims’ families.

Some, however have argued that raw footage like that of James Foley’s execution show us the brutal reality of the terrorists’ crimes.

We want to know what you think: Should graphic videos of terrorist acts be banned?

Poll Results:

Yes (4207)
No (2174)
I don't know (513)

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article

About the author:

Dan MacGuill

Read next: