Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Siti Aisyah (left) and Doan Thi Huong (right) Daniel Chan via PA Images
Malaysia

Judge rules sufficient evidence to allow Kim Jong Nam murder trial to continue

The judge said the evidence presented in court since the trial started in October pointed to a “well-planned conspiracy”.

THE MURDER TRIAL of two women accused of assassinating the half-brother of North Korea’s leader can proceed, a Malaysian court has ruled, in a blow to their families who insist the pair were tricked into carrying out the dramatic hit.

After hearing the prosecution case, the judge said there was sufficient evidence to support a murder charge against Siti Aisyah from Indonesia and Doan Thi Huong from Vietnam, accused of murdering Kim Jong Nam with nerve agent VX at Kuala Lumpur airport.

Judge Azmi Ariffin said the evidence presented in court since the trial started in October pointed to a “well-planned conspiracy” with a group of North Korean suspects who are still at large.

“I must, therefore, call upon (the suspects) to enter their defence on their respective charges,” he said at the Shah Alam High Court outside Kuala Lumpur.

The women, who are set to testify during the defence stage of the trial, looked shocked and tearful as the ruling was handed down. The judge could have chosen to acquit the women if he thought the evidence was insufficient.

Their families maintain the pair were fooled into carrying out the Cold War-style killing, and had been hopeful they would be acquitted, although state prosecutors insisted they had a strong case.

‘She knows nothing’ 

“She knows nothing, she was fooled. The case (against her) was made up,” Aisyah’s father, Asria, told AFP from the family’s village on Indonesia’s Java island.

Her mother Benah added: “This is unfair. I wanted her to be released today but if the court refuses what can I do? I can only pray for the final verdict.”

The trial is set to resume in November and go on for several months. Aisyah (26), will be the first witness to take the stand when proceedings restart.

The women are accused of killing Kim Jong Nam – once seen as an heir to the North Korean leadership and a rival to current leader Kim Jong Un – by smearing toxic VX on his face in February last year as he waited to board a flight to Macau.

The pair, who could face death by hanging if found guilty, claim they fell victim to an elaborate plot hatched by North Korean agents and believed they were taking part in a prank for a reality TV show.

South Korea has accused the North of ordering the hit, although Pyongyang denies the accusation.

But prosecutors, who likened the murder to the plot of a James Bond movie, argued the pair were well-trained assassins who knew exactly what they were doing.

During months of hearings, the court has been told that four North Koreans – who are formally accused alongside the women – recruited the pair and were the masterminds, providing them with the poison on the day of the murder before fleeing the country.

‘Deeply disappointed’

CCTV footage seen in court during the trial showed the women rushing to separate bathrooms in the airport after the murder, before leaving in taxis.

In his ruling, the judge said that the footage “showed that they had the knowledge that the liquid on their hands was toxic”.

The defence teams have argued the women are simply scapegoats, with the authorities unable to catch the real killers and therefore desperate to secure some kind of conviction in the case.

Despite the evidence against them, the women’s lawyers believed that prosecutors had not shown they intended to kill Kim, who had been living in exile for a decade since falling out of favour with the North’s ruling family.

“We are deeply disappointed with the ruling… We will do our best at the defence stage,” said Aisyah’s lawyer Gooi Soon Seng.

Comments are closed as legal proceedings are ongoing.

© – AFP 2018