Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The majority of organisations did not call for legislative change as it "ran the risk of increasing this litigiousness".

Significant recommendation to make children's voices a 'priority' in family justice system

The recommendation suggests that by including the voice of the child it ensures they are “heard and considered”.

THERE HAS BEEN a significant recommendation for children’s voices to be heard more clearly within the justice system to tackle parental alienation.

Parental alienation is where one parent attempts to alienate the other from their children to sever the relationship between them.

New research has shown that a “narrow range of interventions” have been done by Irish courts, in cases where alienation may be present.

The research, commissioned by the Department of Justice, also found that Irish courts do not have a definitive description of parental alienation. 

A number of policy recommendations have been made, by the Department for Justice, around the voice of children within the family courts and additional training.

A research report and a policy paper, published by the Minister yesterday, made a number of recommendations to tackle parental alienation in Ireland.

The department recommended that children should be heard in family courts as “the weight that is attached to children’s views” in court can have a major impact on the claims of alienation.

‘Progress is being made’

The recommendation suggests that by including the voice of the child it ensures they are “heard and considered” and that it will be the responsibility of a working group to review and develop methods to take on the guidance.

Chairperson of Alienated Children First, an advocacy group who represent alienated children and their parents, Janice O’Neill said: “We are generally pleased to see that progress is being made on protecting children in high conflict situations including parental alienation.”

450 responses were received from a public consultation, including 19 interest groups, who expressed that family law services must be improved, the children’s voice must be included and the introduction of training in family law is required for justice professionals.

The majority (73%) of organisations that the department consulted with did not call for legislative change as new laws ran the risk of increasing the litigiousness in cases which are “already highly contentious”, according to Treoir, an information service for unmarried parents.

Additional Training

The policy paper published by the Minister also outlined that additional supports such as the right to protection and safety are required and recommended additional training.

Alienated Children First echoed calls for additional training particularly due to a number of other jurisdictions exploring how best to include the voice of the child to avoid manipulation in conflicting cases.

Harris said the findings “point to the need for additional research” on, amongst other things, the impact of family breakdown on children-parent relationships and children’s views of the family law system.

O’Neill said that regulation and training means it will ensure that the authentic voice of the child is protected and reported.

The Justice Minister said the recommendations contained in the policy paper “underpin the need to see the matter through a broader family justice lens”.

“This is about placing children at the heart of the system which is further enabled to hear them, about supporting and training legal professionals to better understand and support families with their needs and improving what we know about family justice through better data collection,” Harris added.

A spokesperson for the ACF said: “We look forward to information, training and support on parental alienation being rolled out for families dealing with these situations and their incorporation into the Department of Justice strategy and practice.”

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
10 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute AnthonyK
    Favourite AnthonyK
    Report
    May 26th 2023, 2:06 PM

    Was subject to this myself. Relationship with my daughter in tatters. And despite evidence of alienation the judge disregarded it. There are a hell of a lot of fathers (and some mothers) in this situation.

    43
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sinéad O'Brien
    Favourite Sinéad O'Brien
    Report
    May 26th 2023, 6:49 PM

    @AnthonyK: That’s terribly sad for you and your children. So unjust

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael James Brennan
    Favourite Michael James Brennan
    Report
    May 26th 2023, 3:54 PM

    Haven’t seen my children for over 20 years ,thanks to the failure of the legal system.

    19
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute AnthonyK
    Favourite AnthonyK
    Report
    May 26th 2023, 5:35 PM

    In the event of a marital breakdown there should be 50/50 access as a default. Whichever parent breaks this, where it is shown that the allegation was vexatious, then the other parent should get sole custody with the other parent getting supervised access. That, I believe, would put a stop to the warring nature facilitated by the courts. However, barristers and solicitors who earn a fortune from the trauma heaped on a child, will not like this.

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Jude Redmond
    Favourite Paul Jude Redmond
    Report
    May 26th 2023, 3:45 PM

    Should be a criminal offence

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Pato
    Favourite Pato
    Report
    May 26th 2023, 10:06 PM

    Would they be like the children’s voices on the Ray D’Arcy show?

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel