You’re seem smrt, Peter.

Indeed. How about actually showing the original ad, along with some Romney ads that have a “pretty brutal” effect on Obama’s credibility?

Also, in terms of the wider media coverage, what about those usual left wing complaints about “nasty Republicans” with their negative attack ads? I wonder if there are ever any “nasty Democratic” attack ads?

Original ad link is provided in this piece too, Thanks, Susan

@almar, so how is pulling him up based on recorded evidence nasty? He dug his own hole.

If you dive head first into a pile of shite you don’t come out of it smelling of roses!

the journal worships Obama, there is a bias! like obama just has to sneeze and you guys are posting 90 pics of him

Its not the Journal’s fault hiring a pro-Romney contributor that can write at a journalistic standard and wont bring the publication into dispute with a racist hate speach is likely next to impossible.

Would you like the staff to pretend they don’t believe he’s a quack just to be ‘fair’

Its not the Journal’s fault hiring a pro-Romney contributor that can write at a journalistic standard and wont bring the publication into dispute with a racist hate speech is likely next to impossible.

Would you like the staff to pretend they don’t believe he’s a quack just to be ‘fair’

If you have been following you might have noticed that Romney has been having a terrible campaign (for the past month in particular ) , to be in with a chance he needs to win a couple of swing states and he’s a full 10 points behing Obama in Ohio , it’s closer in other swing states but no one has EVER come back and beaten an incumbent president from this far behind 50 days out , I think Romney is a muppet and hope Obama beats him hands down anyway.

@Ryan…’a litttle bit biased..’.

Bad as Obambi might be….you’d want to be sorta sleepwalking not be nervous of Mitt getting in.

At least Obama is less likely to jump on the big red button to placate Bibi&Co.
Romney could just hit it thinking he was ordering another coffee.