TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Mick Wallace given permission to make Dáil statement at 5.45pm

Government chief whip Paul Kehoe has confirmed the TD has been allocated time to speak about his tax affairs.

Image: Photocall Ireland

Updated 10.58am

INDEPENDENT TD MICK Wallace has been given permission to make a personal statement in the Dáil this afternoon about his tax affairs.

Government chief whip Paul Kehoe has confirmed that the TD has been allocated fifteen minutes to make a statement at the end of Dáil business at 5.45pm.

The whips for the five main Dáil groupings had recommended that Wallace be allowed to make the statement after his original request was turned down by Ceann Comhairle Sean Barrett.

It’s likely that other deputies will not be given a chance to speak about Wallace’s tax affairs in order not to prejudice any future investigation.

On Monday Ceann Comhairle Seán Barrett denied the independent TD’s request for time to make a personal statement, but recommended that Deputy Wallace should make a request to the government.

Last week it emerged that his company M&J Wallace had failed to declare its tax bill correctly. The company under-declared by about €1.4 million and later reached a €2.13 million settlements with Revenue.

Meanwhile a Committee on Members Interests is writing to Wallace to establish facts about his tax affairs before proceeding with an investigation. The committee wants to establish whether or not the settlement with the Revenue Commissioners was reached during Wallace’s tenure in office.

The committee will also enter in correspondence with Revenue on the issue, and is due to meet again next week.

Yesterday the Dáil was briefly suspended over an argument about whether or not Wallace’s tax affairs could be discussed. Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin said that there was no reason why the discussion could not take place. The Ceann Comhairle repeated that Standing Order 44 provides that statements should be strictly personal and that a debate should not be permitted afterwards.

- Additional reporting by Christine Bohan

Read: Oireachtas Committee to write to Mick Wallace over tax affairs>

More: Dáil suspended after Martin, Barrett class over Wallace statement>

Read next:

Comments (63 Comments)

  • Sorry and resign are not in the political dictionary

    Reply
  • We get crucified over a €100 Household Charge and a leader of the country can say “I won’t be paying that €2.1 million settlement”, and can hold onto a job where the taxpayer pays the salary?? It’s a joke.

    Reply
  • There are only four words I want to hear from Wallace today: “I’m sorry; I resign”.

    Reply
  • He will not resign. He is far too arrogant and egotistical to even contemplate that course of action.

    Let’s look at the facts:

    1. He paid himself and his son twice what was normal in the year he knew his company was in the toilet.
    2. He knowingly defrauded the Revenue under some faux altruistic notion about saving jobs.
    3. He saunters off to the Euros as if nothing is wrong, misses a sitting of the Dail and then returns as if nothing has happened.

    He is no better than the rest if them. In fact he is worse because of his holier than thou attitude towards other politicians.

    Get him out and put him in jail.

    Reply
    • He can’t afford to resign, we should all chip in, poor ald mick.

      Reply
    • M 14/06/12 #

      Spot on

      Mick, you are not cool, not funny, not sound. Your image of a “working man takes on the world” is over, you knew all this was going to happen that’s why you went into politics, this is your bankruptcy card without having to move to the UK. You manipulated people into thinking you are some sort of hero to vote you in while all along you are exactly the same as the cronys you went on about. Cop on to yourself and resign and get a job like the rest of us to pay back your debts, novelty act is finished.

      Reply
    • @ “M”

      Sadly, what you say is very true. The ordinary ‘Joe or Mary’, on the street that works for minimum wage, pays bills off by giving EUR20/30 a month in order to keep the electricity, gas running. These are real people, trying to live and educate their children to the best of their ability.

      Then, a horrible lying little f . . kwit like Wallace comes along, dressed in jeans, t shirt and pretends to enter the Dail representing that ‘Joe and Mary’ when really, he’s representing himself, ‘a self made man, out for what he can make for himself out of the blood, work and sweat of ordinary people. Wallace is a despicable, horrible lying little man, no different to aherne & co. bankers, and others in the Dail, and they know who they are!

      Reply
  • The subtext of whatever he says will be… “I want to stay here til my two years are up and I get my nice cushy dail pension.” With an added Mwahahaha.

    Reply
  • In that nest of vipers he is quite safe

    Reply
  • rayven 14/06/12 #

    I had small business and when I was unable to pay vat I had the sheriff at my gate and this was only 1500 euro I had to make arrangement to pay like it or not or loose my car or whatever this guy gets elected to the dail as a lefty politician what a laugh and as for Michael lowery he used his political position not only to feather his nest but to guild it and was found guilty by a tribunal and still has his seat and pensions intact and his latest stunt for a massive casino is another political money making operation with mafia types this country is a joke it was reported this year that highest lotto grants outside Dublin is in the Taoiseachs constituency what’s with that no real media investigative journalism done still no articles on O’BRIANs takeover of independent news and media and no statement from government on this monopoly of the media in Ireland

    Reply
  • “The committee wants to establish whether or not the settlement with the Revenue Commissioners was reached during Wallace’s tenure in office.”

    Surely the Revenue can tell them that!

    Reply
  • They should schedule his time during the Ireland – Spain game. That’d piss him off.

    Reply
  • They should have given him the time slot at about 7:45 tonight .. that way his stumbling ramble would receive the audience it deserves.

    I’d say the poor unfortunates who paid wallace the VAT are only delighted to know that they are living in a Negative Equity apartment after financing this VAT payment over 20/30/40 years while Mick decided to give himself a 100% pay rise with their/government money

    Reply
  • What not paying back… He has a salary not?
    Take at source and leave him with 180 a week….
    With the recesses they have he will still be better of than 40% of the average worker with kids

    Reply
  • He should be in mount joy with the rest of the criminals

    Reply
  • Allow him to comment and the Dail glorifies his actions.

    Reply
  • just drops nicely for half time if he keeps it short he can catch all the second half too.

    Reply
  • Considering how Lowry was given special treatment by FG & allowed to make a statement, I think it’s perfectly acceptable that Wallace be allowed address this issue to the Dáil.

    That being said, the man dodged tax while doubling his own salary. He should resign.

    Reply
  • U are a cruel crowd his business failed he didn’t. How many people have killed themselves over this kind of cave man attitudes.he is entitled to rise above it all and start again . His business failed..and that happened before he was elected.

    Reply
  • @Eilish Deegan,

    His business failed and he is a failure and a thief. The fact is, “He did NOT pay VAT” He stole from many and still pocketed tons of money! He was very much involved in the Italian Quarter on the Quays. He got paid! Will you wake up Eilish.

    He’s a thief and a liar and he needs to own up and apologize to many. I run a new little business. I’m still not getting a wage from it. Not collecting job seekers, NOTHING, my savings pay my bills and I have put EUR1,000′s into the business and still am because I am passionate about what I do and I am passionate to help children and their parents.

    Wallace couldn’t give 2 sh1ts about you, me, his employees, nobody, but himself. I detest individuals like him of which there are many!

    Reply
  • Come on it’s his business that failed due to the recession.thats like putting the rest of us in jail because we can’t pay our mortgages due to the recession. He paid 15 m into the exchequer when all was going good which is more than enda or anyone else in the dail paid. U are allowed fail in business in recession it happens all the time .

    Reply
    • Technically the company broke the law, not the man. I see no problem with that.

      Reply
    • He defrauded revenue by knowingly under-declaring tax owed, that is a criminal offence. I’m no issue with his business failing but I do have with his illegal and immoral activities, i.e paid himself and his son twice what was normal in the year he knew his company was going under. How you can have sympathy for him is beyond me.

      Reply
    • made 14/06/12 #

      What planet are you living on, I lost my business and was hounded for tax that I owed, which I paid but was nothing in the bracket of Wallace. He knowingly defrauded on VAT and publicly admitted it and your saying leave him alone, I bet you didn’t come to Mr Begley ‘s defence when he was sent to prison for 6 years for doing the exact same thing and he actually paid what he owes. Just makes me even more happier that I refused to pay the household charge.

      Reply
    • Eilish! It seems you’re missing the point in this! Regardless as to whether his business failed or not, he deliberately stole money he’d collected on the states behalf! It’s not as if he just couldn’t pay the state! He wilfully chose not to hand over money that never belonged to him in the first instance! Big difference between him and someone just not having the money to pay a mortgage!

      Reply
    • VAT is collected on the states behalf….. He charged 18-21% on top of his invoices to his customers…. Which he never passed on to the state…. VAT is not part of gross proceeds.

      Reply
    • This is just an artificial witch hunt against Mick Wallace whipped up by the Blueshirts, filled with arrogance after their hollow victory in the referendum. What kind of knee-jerk reaction has so many of you standing beside this cruel government on this issue?

      Where I live, me and many of my buddies and local activists are enraged at the attempts to unseat Mick while we still have to see Seanie Fitzpatrick walk free around the area, playing golf, dining a la carte and living high on the hog in his €2million mansion.

      Not to mention corrupt crooks like Bertie, Michael Lowry, Beverley Flynn, Enda’s friend Denis O’Brien and many more who just got away with it and are in no danger of jail, where they should be.

      Get a grip, you sheep. Baaaaah!!!!

      Reply
    • mattoid 14/06/12 #

      @Karl
      This government wouldn’t have to increase taxes and/or slash spending if people like Pinkie Wallace didn’t steal from the state.
      Remember this wasn’t his earnings that he tried to evade paying taxes on – it was VAT, ie. the State’s money which Pinkie Wallace collected on the taxpayer’s behalf but decided to hold onto it for himself instead.
      Your point about Fitzy, Fingers and all the rest of them is well made, but that doesn’t make Pinkie Wallace any less guilty of stealing from the taxpayer!

      Reply
    • Outed yourself as irrational there, Karl. What do you have to say about Wallace doubling his and his son’s salary while he knew the jig was up and the company was going down the pan? That was our money he was paying himself. You can’t catch all the fish at once. He’s as rotten as the rest of them; you’re still wooed by his faux-common man schtick. Four legs good, two legs bad etc.

      Reply
    • @ Eilish Deegan, Aidan Breen,

      I assume you are both kidding? It’s the ‘knowing’ that he was doing wrong, is so wrong. Thief, lying little sh1t.
      By the way, where’s the accountant in all this? Surely, his accountant, if he had one, knows and is part of this? Has the Revenue spoken to him/her?

      Reply
    • KarlMarcks
      Witchhunt alright, but not whipped up by the blueshirts. Mick Wallace unseated a FF TD in Wexford drawing his support mainly from an area that had returned a FF TD to Dail Eireann consecutively for the last 30 years or more – a bitter pill for the Soldiers of Destiny who vowed to see him down.
      Of course when the chill winds of recession started to bite at the heels of Fianna Fail linked developers NAMA was set up to shelter them from harm and hide their dealings under a cloak of secrecy. Not so for M. Wallace though whose debts were calculated and declared at 19 million – just 1 million short of the 20 million NAMA entry marker!
      So while the goings on of FF linked developers were being secreted away under the cloak of NAMA the nefarious deeds of M Wallace were open for all to see and the liabilities of his companies were left to the mercy of the banks and the Revenue.
      Like all parties leaving power FF left a process in place where their favoured chums would be snug and dry – M Wallace was just not one of them.

      Reply
    • censored 14/06/12 #

      I’m confused. Somebody please clarify: did Mick Wallace steal money from the Irish taxpayer or not? Endof. We can sort out the rest of them too.

      Reply
    • censored:

      ”All pigs are equal but some pigs are more equal than others”

      Reply
    • mattoid 14/06/12 #

      @Censored
      Yes.

      Reply
  • Obviously not a lot of u have had business or watch them fall down around u when u have no control over its demise and u are not responsible.this is a linch mob approach that has to stop .linching the wrong guy. He worked hard for a living .he didn’t get a seat from his family.he didn’t sign a bank guarantee .again he should nt leave till he holds the door for the rest of em, and locks the door behind him handing the key over to perhaps “sli nios fearr”who seem to b makin the right noises

    Reply
  • Don’t know a lot about business but I think a lot of business use their vat money to pay for supplies and services till they get paid themselves then pay the vat .it would have been business as usual for him if the recession didn’t screw him up .vat is an accounting balancing act. We have had the biggest banking collapse ever. People have jumped for less.can only admire mick for keeping it together.no one person can ride this storm easily .

    Reply
    • Jim 14/06/12 #

      Apologists like this are why this country has ended up in the state it is. So because we’ve had a banking collapse everybody gets a free pass on defrauding the state, or not paying taxes.

      This was not a balancing act. This was a deliberate fraud on the state compounded by the fact that he payed himself and his son double in a year when his business was struggling. Why didn’t he use that money to pay off some of his VAT bill? Why didn’t he ring the Revenue Commissioners and indicate that he was having cashflow difficulties and couldn’t meet his obligation?

      Reply
    • VAT gets paid at the same time as the invoice…..
      It was not his to begin with.
      He is a scamming opportunistic bon-vivant….

      Pay up what you owe and stop ripping off the tax and vat payers even more by leaving your position Wallace!

      Reply
    • censored 14/06/12 #

      What about right and wrong? Do you know anything about that Eilish?

      Reply
  • If he cut his hair and wore a navy suit with a FG/Lab colour tie he wouldn’t be subject to accountability for his actions. I’m sure there is a report being circulated around by Empress of Europe Angela Merkel in the The self appointed European Federal Government in Germany with the solution they will tell us to carry out to fix the problem but then again this stageshow is being used to drown that matter out.

    Reply
  • Hindsight is wonderful guess like the rest of us he didnt think things would get so bad.why not review the whole vat thing then and people could sell their products at 21% less leaving the consumer with21%to put into the economy, leaving the business person get on with their business and stop makin tax collectors out of them.

    Reply

Add New Comment