TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 14 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Nato apologises for the death of Afghan civilians in air strike

Women, children and village elders were killed in a pre-dawn raid aiming to capture a Taliban operative earlier this week.

Elderly men sit with the covered bodies of three children killed the strike
Elderly men sit with the covered bodies of three children killed the strike
Image: AP Photo/Ihsanullah Majroh

THE COMMANDER OF US and Nato forces in Afghanistan has apologised for civilian deaths in a coalition airstrike earlier this week.

Marine General John Allen flew to Logar province on Friday to personally deliver his regrets to villagers and provincial officials for the deaths of women, children and village elders in Wednesday’s pre-dawn raid to capture a Taliban operative. Afghan officials have said the airstrike that was called in by Nato troops during the operation killed 18 civilians.

General Allen told the Afghans they “have my apology and we will do the right thing by the families.”

It was the first confirmation by Nato forces that civilians were killed.

An Afghan doctor who examined the bodies and interviewed witnesses said insurgents prevented the civilians from leaving the house during the fighting.

Read: Afghan civilians killed in suicide bombings and NATO airstrike – report

Read next:

Comments (23 Comments)

  • Women and children killed!!! Oops. We are so sorry. We’ll see what we can do to remediate.
    NATO action are just terrorism itself but covered by law and the ‘international community’

    Reply
  • The FBI’s definition of terrorism –

    A terrorist incident is a violent act or an act dangerous to human life, in violation of the criminal laws of the United States, or of any state, to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.

    Bout time they were called out on what they are.

    Reply
  • Well they said they’re sorry. So that’s all right so. Let the bombing resume.

    Reply
  • Its ok folks, they said sorry

    Reply
  • If only Saddam had’ve said sorry!

    Reply
  • Crocodile tears – Who exactly are the “terrorists” here?

    Reply
  • This is yet another tragic incident in a pointless war. The United States are committed to withdrawing from Afghanistan and when they do the Karzai regime will fall and the country will quickly be taken over by the Taliban. So be it. The West has no business trying to stop the country going to hell in a handbasket if it chooses to do so. It’s sad that so many lives will have been wasted in vain so that the US can learn the lesson that Russia also learned the hard way – Afghanistan can not be subdued by outsiders. The sooner withdrawal takes place the sooner this slaughter of the innocents will cease. Obama should expedite the process – the country is not worth any more expenditure of lives and fortune. Of course, this will not please the US military-industrial complex – there are big profits being made and thousands of people employed in the manufacture of armaments but, no doubt, there will always be other conflicts to keep that constituency happy. As someone said, when all you’ve got is a hammer everything looks like a nail.

    Reply
    • RDX862 08/06/12 #

      Like the killing will stop when the US leaves…..The former Northern Alliance who fought the Taliban during the civil war and helped oust them after 9/11 have already regrouped under the National Front of Afghanistan.

      General Abdul Rashid Dostum – “The Taliban have taken control of some places in areas of Samangan, Shadyan Valley, and Ghormach Mountains and they are preparing for a battle after 2014,” he said. “They don’t believe in peace. We will not allow them once again to act brutally against women and burn schools.”

      Reply
    • @RDX862

      What are you getting at? Trying to provide some justification for the Americans being there? Because it’s not going to work. This is a pointless and vindictive war waged against a peasant people, any reasonable person can see that. It’s just unfortunate that so many Americans are brainwashed by right-wing media and politicians into thinking they’re somehow “fighting to protect democracy”, or rather the American interpretation of “democracy”.

      Make no mistake, the Taliban are a dreadful, insidious force, by all accounts. But the Americans are no better, and have far more destructive weaponry. They went into Afghanistan with no regard for the history or complexity of the conflict they were getting themselves into, and at the end of the day it is more often than not Americans from a lower socio-economic background that are used as pawns in these conflicts. They, and the Afghan civilians will have to bare the brunt of this imperialist war. The Americans have no business being there, you can’t free people by indiscriminately bombing them.

      Reply
  • N A T O = north atlantic terrorist organisation

    Reply
    • Haven’t heard that one before. Like it. Sums it up in one. Amazing how many people are outraged by killings in Syria but nobody really bothered by the mass murdering in Afghanistan and Iraq. Media manipulation is why. Our media is bought and paid for.

      Reply
  • 4 more years for Obama and let the killing continue :)

    Reply
  • RDX862 08/06/12 #

    Yes obviously the Taliban have no responsibility when they prevented the civilians from leaving and then opened fire on Afghan and Nato troops. I wonder will the Taliban be apologizing to the families of the 18 people including 6 women that they blew up today in Pakistan?

    Reply
    • I suppose you would also be giving out if the Taliban kicked them out of the house into the middle of the cross fire. The problem with all conflicts is that inevitably the civilians get the shit end of the stick. If the Taliban aren’t shooting them for getting an education the US are bombing them because they happen to be in the way of a high value target. The problem with drones is that the guy flying it is 6,000 miles away and doesn’t know who is Taliban and who isn’t. Frankly they don’t give a shit so long as a HVT (High Value Target) is eliminated. If 18 civilians get killed then they are collateral damage but hey, it could be worse they could be Americans, or so goes the US rationale.

      Reply
    • RDX862 08/06/12 #

      But that would never happen Brian because they use women and kids as human shields. Same day this happened the Taliban killed 23 civilians in a suicide attack in a market in Kandahar. The Taliban target civilians and nobody cares because they are not the big evil USA.

      “An Afghan doctor who examined the bodies said villagers told him that a group of Taliban fighters decided to spend the night in the house because people there were celebrating a marriage and the militants thought the wedding party would provide them cover. When NATO and Afghan troops started advancing on the house in the middle of the night, they called out for any civilians to come out, but the insurgents didn’t allow them to leave, said Dr. Wali Wakil.

      “The Taliban stopped them from getting out of the house,” Wakil said.

      He said the 18 dead civilians including four women; two older men, including a tribal leader; three teenage boys; and nine young children. Six Taliban fighters were also killed, Wakil said, citing the witnesses. Police had said previously that the district Taliban commander was killed.

      Allen said the U.S.-Afghan force called in an airstrike after taking fire, presumably from inside the house, and that the troops did not know civilians were inside.

      ” A hand grenade was thrown. Three of our people were wounded. We called for the people who were shooting to come out, and then the situation became more grave and innocent people were killed,” he said.

      Anti-government forces, including the Taliban and other militants, were responsible for 79 percent of civilian casualties in the first four months of this year, according to the U.N. Afghan and foreign forces were responsible for 9 percent. It was unclear who was to blame for the remaining 12 percent. ”

      http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2012/06/08/world/asia/ap-as-afghanistan.html

      Reply
    • Look I don’t like the Taliban the same as anyone else but that doesn’t mean that I believe the US either. what the article fails to mention is that Dr Wali Wakil is the head of the US backed Logar provincial council and was recently arrested on embezzlement charges. Not exactly a reliable witness in my view especially when the US are paying his wages. I’d like to see an independent source following up on the story especially when Gen Allen said that the gunfire was “presumably” coming from the building.

      Considering the American mantra of shoot/bomb first apologize later I’m not too sure if I was in that building whether I would like to walk out in front of US guns and their hair trigger soldiers.

      Reply
    • RDX862 08/06/12 #

      Corruption is a national pastime in Afghanistan so the only thing any embezzlement charges mean is that he pissed the wrong person off. Not sure how the fact that the US probably funds his council has anything to do with his reliability? Are you trying to say that the US would cut funding if he did not say what they want?

      Reply
  • Murdering bastards..I imagine the taliban will be getting some new recruits in that area. If it were my family killed i know id be joining up..And they get called the ‘terrorists’…sickening

    Reply

Add New Comment