TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Pussy Riot trial: prosecutors want three years for band members

Three members of the Russian punk band face jail on hooliganism charges after a stunt against Vladimir Putin.

RUSSIAN PROSECUTORS HAVE asked for a three-year sentence for each member of feminist punk band Pussy Riot who performed a stunt against Vladimir Putin in Moscow’s main cathedral.

The hooliganism charges the three women are facing carry a sentence of up to 7 years in prison.

Prosecutor Alexander Nikiforov said in a web-cast court hearing that a 3-year term would take into account the fact that two of the defendants are young mothers.

The three women — Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, 23; Maria Alekhina, 24; and Yekaterina Samutsevich, 29 — have been in custody for five months following the February stunt, in which they took over a church pulpit in Christ the Savior cathedral for less than a minute, singing, high-kicking and dancing.

The defendants have said their goal was to express their resentment over Russian Orthodox Church Patriarch Kirill’s support for Putin’s rule.

“They set themselves off against the Orthodox world and sought to devalue traditions and dogmas that have been formed for the centuries” the prosecutor said today.

Members of the band say they did not mean to hurt anyone’s religious feelings when they performed the “punk prayer”.

Their case is part of a widening government crackdown on dissent that followed Putin’s election in March and caused strong protests in Russia and abroad.

Larisa Pavlova, a lawyer for the church employees who were described as the injured party in the case, told the court today that she supports the 3-year-sentence for the band.

Pavlova said most hooliganism in Russia is committed when people are drunk and they often regret what they have done — but the defendants “thoroughly planned, rehearsed (their performance) and were fully aware of what they were doing”.

“And they had the audacity to say in court that they did the right thing, that it’s OK and that they’re ready to keep on doing such things,” Pavlova said.

Tolokonnikova chuckled as Pavlova mentioned in her speech that feminism in Russia is incompatible with Orthodox faith.

The trial has sharply divided Russia. Some believers felt insulted by the act, while rights groups have declared the women prisoners of conscience.

Orthodox leaders have ignored calls by many Orthodox believers to pardon the women and urge the court to dismiss the case.

Madonna calls for Pussy Riot pardon>

Read next:

Comments (16 Comments)

  • If you are making a comparison to Feminism and Nazism, you sir, are an idiot….

    Reply
    • similar traits , personal gain, propoganda, segregation, inequality, discrimination .

      Reply
    • @Stephen:
      fem·i·nism/ˈfeməˌnizəm/
      Noun: The advocacy of women’s rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men.
      fas·cism/ˈfaSHizəm/
      Noun: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organisation. (in general use) Extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.

      I’m a feminist. I don’t want more rights than men, I want the same rights as men. I’m from a family of feminists, essentially, and I’m the only daughter out of five children. It’s not just a “wimmins issue”.
      I’m also not sure where you got the “personal gain” thing from. That seemed entirely irrelevant to whatever point it was you were trying to make.

      Reply
  • What a show trial they are PUTIN on.

    Reply
  • Nothing has changed since the fall of the Soviet Union. Corruption is rife in most of the previous members (this is coming from multiple people I know from Russia and the Ukraine). It’s literally just a flag and face change, nothing more.

    Protesting against Putin and the current regime now is like protesting against the Communist Party in the USSR.

    Reply
    • angryzes 07/08/12 #

      Nothing has changed? You have no idea what you’re talking about.

      Reply
    • Of course, because 4 people from Russia including 3 from Moscow and a university teacher would have absolutely no idea what Russia is like.

      Reply
    • “Nothing has changed since the fall of the Soviet Union”? What a sweeping, uninformed statement to make. I lived in St. Petersburg during the 1990’s and low-level crime, petty gangsterism and hoodlums were rife. That’s what people in the West don’t get. The reason that people were willing to vote for guys like Lebed’ in the 90’s and Putin after him is because they cleaned up this problem. Your average Russian didn’t feel safe on the streets of its main cities before that. My wife is from Russia’s 3rd biggest city and didn’t go out on her own until her early 20’s as it was just too dangerous. Yes – corruption no doubt still goes on at the highest level, but your average person over there cares less about that than he does about someone putting a knife to his throat. As I’m sure we would here too given the same choices.

      Reply
  • “Prosecutor Alexander Nikiforov said in a web-cast court hearing that a 3-year term would take into account the fact that two of the defendants are young mothers.” Bizarre.

    Reply
  • The fact that interrupting private religious ceremonies is a no-no is rather understandable, and anyone who decides to embark on this kind of protest has to take this into account and face the consequences. I don’t think anyone would interrupt a ceremony at the Pro-Cathedral in Dublin and not expect to get arrested….

    What’s completely outrageous is that this merits a custodial sentence… A small fine (less than €500) at MOST!

    Reply
  • Protesting Putin is not the issue here. People in Moscow protest him regularly and without sanction. These three walked into a church and disrupted a religious service. That’s a crime of vandalism in Ireland also.

    Reply
    • I wonder if they would be prosecuted under our blasphemy laws rather than their hooliganism laws had it been in Ireland? Three years for causing an offence to the sensitivities of church goers is a travesty. I sometimes think this world is going backwards…

      Reply
    • angryzes 07/08/12 #

      Exactly, I would like to see how it can be possible in Ireland, if someone, let’s say against TV license or new household charge will perform a “punk prayer” in St. Patricks Cathedral. Or, during confirmation or communion ceremony in some rural church.

      Reply
    • They deserve to be punished for their actions. A crime does not cease to be a crime because it is committed by women, or in the name of feminism or any other ‘ism’. If you think they should get a free pass, try this: shave your head, dress like a skinhead and disrupt the services in your local mosque. See how far you get, and see if Amnesty wants to defend you.

      Reply
  • @ Simon. Congratulations on ‘GODWINNING’ the thread …lol

    Reply

Add New Comment