TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Rachel Peavoy inquest returns verdict of death by misadventure

The Dublin City Coroner finds that medication and wet hair were risk factors in the death of Rachel Peavoy last year.

A DUBLIN CORONER has returned a verdict of death by misadventure in the inquest into the death of Rachel Peavoy, the mother of two who died of hypothermia while alone in her council flat in January 2010.

City coroner Dr Brian Farrell cited the evidence of Peavoy’s friend Jacqueline Johnston, who today told the inquest that Peavoy had not eaten properly in the three days prior to her death – and who had made a new statement denying that the flat was cold, RTÉ News reports.

Finding that Dublin City Council had not cut off the heating to Peavoy’s flat in the Shangan Road complex in Ballymun, Farrell said the abandonment of other nearby flats meant the heating may not have been totally effective – though it seemed to be working at the time of her death.

There had, however, been other risk factors in Rachel’s death – such as the fact that she had wet hair, seemingly after having a bath, and the fact that she was on prescription medication.

That medication, Farrell concluded, may have left her less sensitive to cold conditions.

The Irish Examiner reported that Johnston, who had discovered Rachel’s body, confirmed she had opened the window of Peavoy’s flat herself to try and get rid of a “musty” smell in the apartment while she waited for the ambulance to arrive.

The garda who attended the scene had told an earlier sitting of the inquest that the flat was “freezing”. Previous sittings had been adjourned as a dispute arose over whether the window had been open at the time of Peavoy’s passing.

Peavoy and her family had complained to the council and to local TD Noel Ahern about the standard of heating in her flat in the months before her death, and her relatives and friends protested as Farrell’s verdict was recorded.

In doing so, Farrell asked the City Council to review its de-tenanting procedures.

The Peavoy family has called for a public inquiry into Rachel’s death, which occurred on January 11 of last year amid heavy snow.

Read next:

Comments (15 Comments)

  • R.I.P. Rachael

    Reply
  • This is a tragic tragic case, that young woman was obviously suffering, nobody in a civilised society ought to die in such desperate circumstances. What has become of this country? I don’t recognize it any longer, it used to be a compassionate place where people cared about one another. Is this what economic development cost us, our souls?

    Reply
    • Yes it is a sad sign in todays world,The first line in assistance is
      your family and friends,I think an expectation that a state body has
      a capacity to care about people has long been dismissed,But I
      dont think you can blame one state body for this awful tragedy,
      there were as in most cases a set of errors that led to this outcome.
      I would have agree with the coroners decision.but it leaves me with
      concerns about some of the evidence given.Maybe now they can
      demolish these death traps.its not the first or last tragic death to
      come from those flats.Maybe they could name a new school or
      housing complex in rachaels name to honour the memory of her life.

      Reply
  • How can she change her story at the last minute

    Reply
  • I stand by my initial comments on this tragic case. The officials should have sorted the living arrangements out a long time ago. Public officials, council officials and those who are elected by public have a duty of care which seems to have been passed on to the next person at each opportunity.
    The tenants of these buildings should not be living in such conditions in the 21st century and the new accommodation should be finished & sorted ASAP.
    My sympaties are with the family and I hope that this never happens again.

    Reply
  • Risk factors:

    1 medication
    2 wet hair
    3 class
    4 social status
    5 poverty
    6 double standards
    7 …

    Reply
    • Agree with you. Tenants are only contacted if they behind in rent, but otherwise if they make any complaints re living conditions or anti social behavior are left on their own, the poorest and less educated are ignored.

      Reply
    • To the “negative” vote guy: What I really mean – I had my hair wet and got my prescribed medication tonight – two major risk factors, how dangerous is that? How many of us can afford that without risking their lives?

      Reply
  • I strongly believe this girl was let down by the so called system
    I didnt know you rachel but have been following this since your death
    My heart goes out to your family and friends
    RIP rachel x

    Reply
  • This case involving an old friend (Rachael) who I play with as a child, reminds me of how much Corruption and lies that STILL go on in our public departments. It makes me so Fxxking sick to the stomach. My sympathies go out to her family that she left behind. R.I.P. Rachael.

    Reply
  • Petition to call for a Public Inquiry over the Death of Rachel Peavoy:

    http://www.petitiononline.com/jaderyan/petition.html

    Reply
  • I’m very sorry about the circumstances surrounding this girls death but it seems to me that when situations like this arise it’s always someone elses fault. This might sound harsh, but the primary supports for any individual should be in the first instance from family , friends and let’s not forget personal responsibility. Responsibility for ones own actions. After those are considered then look at what the services done wrong. In that extreme weather we all have a responsibility to check with our loved ones and neighbours to see if they are ok, not walk away and leave it to the state. If you are concerned of a vulnerable individual living near you and you cant help… Then call the state service.

    Reply
    • just to reply to ur comment about this case rachel was a healty young woman as the patoligist stated it was NORMAL LEVELS OF PRESCRIBED MEDICATION IN HER SYSTEM and as for blaming someone else if u live in RENTED accomidation yes we do pay rent and also everyone pays heating charges which is included in the rate of ur rent do u know how the heating system works in these flats no one flat has its own heating system the heat rises threw the floors from a boiler system at the bottom and rachel at the time of her death even was ahead of her payments with dcc and she was basically still paying for the pleasure of being FROZEN TO DEATH !!!!! are u telling me that if u wash ur hair 2nite and fall asleep while its damp ui will die from hypotermia ????? and as for the issue of responsibility it was dublin city councils responsibility 2 provide acceptable living conditions 4 there tennants which they do not so u r saying it is up 2 us 2 2 call STASTE SERVICES IF WE HAVE CONCERNS IT WAS THE SAME STATE SERVICE THAT LEFT RACHEL 2 DIE IN SUCH CONDITIONS IN 2010 and she was only vulnerable cause she suffered panic attacks which were not helped by her living conditions other than this she was a healthy happy mother sister freind didn drink even jus looked after her boys have u ever been in these flats yourself by the way ???

      Reply
    • nothing about this person death makes sense

      Reply

Add New Comment