TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Column: Childcare is the main obstacle for women getting into business

If we want more women to become entrepreneurs and help rebuild the economy, then a national childcare scheme is needed, says Sarah Nic Lochlainn.

Sarah Nic Lochlainn

Sarah NicLochlainn from Aruna Sauces in County Louth says getting more women into business is key to our economic recovery and says childcare can be a woman’s main obstacle.

WHEN MY HUSBAND and I decided to run with our business, it was no easy task. We already had a business first of all – a restaurant, Fuchsia House, which we opened in 2005. In its first year we received rave reviews and won many major awards, but as the economy went down so did the number of people dining out. We knew our product was good, so we focused on that.

Ma Aruna’s Chicken Curry – a recipe given to Sarajit by his mother, Aruna – was the most popular dish on our menu. In 2009, due to popular demand we started making Aruna’s Traditional Curry Sauce. We started small, selling directly to the public and at farmers’ markets. In 2010 we developed four more varieties and the range was officially launched by Tom Doorley. From then, it went from strength to strength, winning many awards.

Dragon’s Den

In 2012, we pitched Aruna Sauces in Dragons’ Den, winning an investment from Gavin Duffy. The business has grown substantially since and in May won bronze at the National Start-Up Awards.

As a woman in business, I know for a fact that there are loads of women, probably mothers, who are sitting there with an idea for a business stewing around in their minds. They might have had the idea for many years, but they just don’t think they could see it to fruition. My mother, for example, had a business idea for years and years. It was only until she was in her 50s did she feel she could dedicate the time and thought to setting it up. This is something that I feel is widespread around the country: women who believe they are just mothers or wives, who have great ideas but who don’t have the support to see them through.

Being a woman in business I know I am very lucky. I had a business with my husband, so I had support, but I understand the difficulties faced by women in business, particularly when starting out. When I was at a women in enterprise event people began listing all the obstacles that women face when in business. I was shocked that childcare did not feature on the list. For me, this was ridiculous, as it is the number one reason for women not taking the step into creating their own business or even investigating it.

Childcare costs are astronomical and if you are thinking about opening your own business you better be very aware that it will take up the majority of your time. Childcare is essential if you are a mother who is seriously contemplating it. Enterprise Boards are great at offering women support, and they will even help out with some funds towards childcare, so that you can at least hammer out your idea in peace for a few hours a week. But it really is only nominal. If we want more women to enter into business, a national childcare scheme is needed.

Job creation

The government are constantly talking about job creation –  this is how it can be achieved. Women have great ideas, many that are very unique. If we want to create more businesses that will employ more people, they need to invest in childcare. The country is made up of 50 per cent or so of women. Are their skills and talents being utilised? Not as much as they could be. The need to have your child taken care of, even for a few hours so that you can nurture your business idea and see if it is a runner, is so important.

In my own business, I employ a woman part-time. She is an invaluable member of our team and she is a mother. I know that the business is better with her in it and we are flexible, but if we are to get more of these talented business women into work we need to make it a little easier.

For anyone who thinks they have an idea for business I would definitely suggest they get in touch with their local enterprise board – that was really my first port of call and they were so helpful. I would say that business isn’t easy, especially now, but don’t just sit on your idea for years, there is nothing worse than wondering ‘what if’. Just go for it, try and find a support network and see where it can go from there.



(Via YouTube/EngageIreland)

Sarah Nic Lochlainn of Aruna Sauces is from Donegal but living in Louth. In 2012, they won bronze at the National Start-Up Awards and since then the business has grown substantially.

If you are a woman with a business idea and would like more information about how to get started visit Women in Business Networks and IrishBusinesswomen.com. For more information on Enterprise Boards in Ireland click here.

Read: Men get paid 21% more than women in the private sector>

Read: Companies with female board members outperform those with none>

Read next:

Comments (36 Comments)

  • I agree childcare is a huge issue for most families in Ireland. After a mortgage its probably the next highest household bill. As a childcare manager of a non-profit childcare centre and the one who puts together the budgets it’s not a cheap service to provide once basic overheads are paid wages, esb, council rates, insurance, food etc ther is very little if anything left over. There problem is the lack of support families/ childcare centres get from the government. At present the government invest .2% gdp on childcare compared to our European neighbours at 1%. The government are even cutting this direct cuts or pushing the bar so to make it more difficult for families to access the grants the need to support their families needs. The ECCE “free preschool” scheme is great as it offers universal free places to all, but it was introduced when they cut the early childhood supplement grant which cost the government €5000 per child- the free preschool scheme is costing aprox half that amount. If the government want to get serious on supporting families and children then need to invest heavily in childcare to make it cheaper and more accessible for parents. The importance of early years and afterschools in Ireland isn’t simply to get parents out to work, it’s to give the children the best possible start in life.

    Reply
    • Crèche fees for our two kids are higher than our mortgage.

      The above is no surprise. The fees didn’t suddenly jump up when my wife was pregnant. We knew exactly what it would cost before we decided to have kids.

      If you feel the Childcare costs are too high, don’t have kids.

      If you feel the Childcare costs are not too high, then have kids if you want.

      If you feel the Childcare costs are too high, but choose to have kids anyway, don’t whine about it after the fact.

      Reply
    • Couldn’t agree more.

      Reply
    • @ Continent Simian. It’s not a “whine” It’s good social and economic policy. “Clear educational, labour market and social benefits, seen as important for the development of the Smart Economy, accrue from quality ECEC (childcare) programmes. Further to this, ECEC in general provides good return on investment – with an Irish estimate putting the return at up to €7 for every €1 spent.”- Oireachtas Library & Research Service. According to the ESRI Ireland is the envy of Europe with it’s high birth rate as these are going to be the future taxpayer of our country. This is why it’s so important to give the best start in life and why the government need to invest in quality early years care and education.

      Reply
    • Continent ; So is you crystal ball still working ? so you predicted that when you had your children that your circumstances could only ever remain the same or improve . What if you had pay cut or one or both lost your Jobs and you wanted to re-enter the workforce at lower pay due to tight labour market conditions . Maybe you dont believe in the dignity of work where some people ,mostly women would love to get out there after maybe 5 yearrs of rearing clidren but it makes no sense to do it unless they get a job earning at least 30K , but maybe you think is rational for someone to re-enter the workforce and claer 100 E a week , maybe you dont understandt the economic benifit of getting people back into work where they could work for less is their cost werent so stupid , this would mean more economic activity beacsue of attitional income , less cost for buiness , remove some families for income support . Uttterly infuriating and Child like argument, “Crèche fees for our two kids are higher than our mortgage” you say that like it is s good thing or should be the case

      Reply
  • I agree, childcare was always my number one obstacle, infact when my hours got cut in work I ended up in negative wages. I ended up literally working just to pay the childminder. People who have their parents to help don’t know how lucky they are.

    Reply
  • tracey 20/02/13 #

    well done. great to see someone getting on with it. best of luck.

    Reply
  • I am at the early stage of a career change and currently my monthly childcare costs are greater than my salary. Thankfully my partner works but if he lost his job, I would not be able to afford to work. Childcare costs should be capped and subsidised or substantial tax credits given to help working parents. Universal early years childcare is also shown to go some way to ensuring that children have achieved similar developmental milestones when starting primary education, saving on expensive interventions later. Affordable universal childcare is in everyone’s interests.

    Reply
  • I just feel like rushing out and buying Aruna Sauces!

    Reply
  • Well said Sarah.
    As a mother who wants to be part of the workforce, the cost of childcare is my single biggest obstacle. With 2 small children I would need to be earning a significant amount just to pay to have them cared for. That’s before I have to cover my other costs of working such as transport etc.

    Reply
  • we need legislation to allow flexibility for working mothers, Ireland has one of the lowest numbers of women it senior and director positions because the law is so rigid and employers don’t “legally” have to accommodate people with families. the uk has flexible working, we need to adapt a new framework.

    Reply
    • There is a European law coming into effect from march where women will be entitled to ask for flexible working arrangements when returning from maternity leave. Employers must consider the request but are not obligated to facilitate it. This is as close as we’ll get!

      Reply
    • What would also help is granting fathers paternity leave or allowing parents to share maternity leave to suit their families needs. Currently there is no meaningful supports that allow dads to share the parenting responsibility.

      Reply
  • You are absulately right Sarah and this should be at the top of the obstacles list! As I am seeing from the comments out here women can hardly afford a childcare salary, either they sit at home and take care of them by themselves. No change reflected in purse at the end of the day. So why bothered to work while you could spend more time with your loved ones, which makes perfect sense! I appreciate women a lot who choose to work at that stage with a lot of comprimize a couple of years until the kids can go to schol and then they can eventually focus on they work and business ideas. Something needs to be improved here to balance womens choises. Business needs us!

    Reply
  • Expensive childcare not only makes difficult for parents to go back to work or starting their own businesses but it is also contributing to other problems, such as increasing elitism in creches, where parents may be forced to choose childcare centres depending on how much they charge and not on the quality of the education offered, contributing from the early years, to the inequality of opportunities for children.

    The other problem that this raises is that in some cases, it might force parents to send their children to school before they are ready because parents simply can’t afford another year of childcare expenses.

    We should all look at the Finnish education system, where all schools and childcare and totally subsidized by the estate and their aim is to provide the same level of education to all children, independent of their families’ economic situation.

    Reply
  • What about working fathers?

    Reply
  • Genuinely confused by those couples where both work and one salary just goes to pay the childminder: why not do it yourself for a few years (man or woman give up work, not being sexist here) and gradually return to work when kid is in school? As for the poster who said pre-school and childcare has a duty of stimulation and preparation for school and to prevent problems in society later – am I old fashioned in thinking that this is the primary duty of the parents who chose to have the child? Sure, in some cases where working is inevitable for survival, childcare should step in to fill the gap but why is it the norm to farm out responsibility for childcare? If you’re that mad about your career or income that you are choosing paid childcare over doing it yourself then perhaps you’re not ready for kids?

    Reply
    • Taking a few years out can destroy your career. So much can change in that time. Technology changes, business changes, opportunities come and go. Maintaining relevant skills for your industry becomes tricky, at best. Your capacity to progress up the chain of command to fulfill your earning potential is often wiped out by taking a few years out to stay at home.

      Reply
    • I take your point B, it is a very difficult situation for us women (and for some of the men who decide to take on childcare) and I don’t think that in our current society there’s a “right” answer as far as career protection for stay-at-home mams or dads, if you’re talking about classical workforce chain of command type work. But in my opinion, once you decide to have a child you’re accepting that something will have to give financially and in your career for a while and that things will never be the same as BC (before child ;)).

      It’s entirely a man or woman’s right to choose work over childcare and I’m not advocating staying at home with blinkers on for 18 years till your child is grown, but why the rush back to a desk the minute you’ve had a child? If the money you’re making is just covering childcare, you’re hardly an indispensible VP who may lose your edge… It’s all about perspective really. Surely if you have the financial choice, a couple of years dedicated to your child and a slow return to the workforce will not prevent you from keeping up with your industry and will be of immense benefit to your child – the child you chose to bring into this world, nobody is forcing anyone to reproduce!

      The role of being a parent is so undervalued in our society that it’s delegated to third parties and then we wonder why kids are maladjusted and confused. I think that’s a sad reflection on our society and on the choices offered to women in particular.

      BTW B collins, I’m not sure what age you are but I think you could be younger than me – I was very black and white 10 years ago and would have said similar things to you back then, but it’s amazing how much age and a decade in the workforce smoothes the edges and greys the picture :)

      Reply
    • Well, I think a lot of the problems described by the author would be resolved with a fairer leave system (tbh, I don’t think the state should foot the bill of private childcare). Sweden has a very progressive setup, with 16 months parental leave per child, paid at 80% of the employee’s salary. The costs are split between the state and the employer.

      This arrangement would allow men who want to stay at home and woman who want to keep working, to do so without suffering too much in a professional or financial way. Naturally, I appreciate that having a child incurs an unavoidable hit on both fronts, however it need not be so severe. Long-term, it would also go some way to correcting the gender pay gap.

      One worker’s pay or financial means is hardly an indicator of their value — just take a look at some of the fools in this country who’ve been paid handsomely only to lead incompetently. There are plenty of indispensable workers out there whose contribution is not reflected in his/her pay packet (by a long shot). Likewise, plenty VPs who do eff-all by comparison.

      I maintain that a couple of years out — depending on your industry, of course — DOES set people back both financially and professionally, and it can be very difficult to recover from that, particularly in situations where there simply might not be a job to come back to after taking those few years out. Not to mention that work provides a healthy and important social outlet that a lot of stay-at-home parents really miss.

      Yes, I’m 26 and could be younger than you. But then, I could ALSO have a child. So I don’t see why my capacity to take an holistic view on work-life balance should based on either my photograph or my age. (Sorry to be snarky, but honestly I found that last comment a bit condescending, although I get where you’re coming from).
      :)

      Reply
  • This is utterly naive: ‘ If more mothers took care of their would allow unemployed people into the work force, reducing the social welfare spend.’ That’s not what happens by a long shot. When a highly qualified irish woman stops working, it’s not some random unqualified person on the dole who gets the job. The work is more than likely contracted out to another country. This is what this woman would probably do if she gave up the job. She would hire a company somewhere else, somewhere cheaper, to make those sauces and run that business.

    Then the job, and the accompaning taxes just leave the country. Leaving us all in a worse position.

    Work begets work. When both partners work, they create employment, as they buy more services, and hire more people. Our unemployment is mainly building-industry collapse based. One bricklayer on the dole is not a replacement for a working woman with a 3rd level degree in biochemistry. They are not interchangable. You are in cuckoo-land if you think they are.

    Reply
  • “When a highly qualified irish woman stops working, it’s not some random unqualified person on the dole who gets the job. The work is more than likely contracted out to another country.” If she is that qualified and specialised she should be earning enough to cover childcare costs. This would make a national scheme a moot point. This line of argument simply does not hold water.

    “Work begets work. When both partners work, they create employment, as they buy more services, and hire more people.” Yes, work does beget work – and you are right. When both partners work they can buy more services – yes like childcare services and hire more people – like child carers.

    “Our unemployment is mainly building-industry collapse based.” Fantastic news for all those law graduates, business graduates and other unemployed third level graduates. Building and construction has been hit hard but everyone is hurting, to say otherwise is, as you say, utterly naive.

    You are effectively looking to get money for free. Unfortunately there is no such thing as “free” money – it will be taken from someones pocket at some stage.

    Reply
  • sam mac 20/02/13 #

    Definitely agree, but in the short term do we really need to focus on spending money on growing the workforce when unemployment among the existing workforce us so high.

    Reply
  • Shameless plug of your product

    Reply
  • Well done Sarah great article

    Reply
  • This reads like an essay written by a ten year old

    Reply
  • First off hats off to anyone who decides to have a baby. It is an expensive choice and not one to be embarked upon lightly “Childcare is the main obstacle for women getting into business” is code for take more taxes from people who dont have kids to pay for those who have. in fairness its not immaculate conception. if you decide (yes girls and boys it is choice and an expensive one at that.) if you decide to have kids then why should everyone else pay for it.

    Reply
  • Rob Roy 20/02/13 #

    This is an absolute disgrace to journalism and free speech – where have my comments gone???

    Reply

Add New Comment