TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Column: Is it time to grow up about Europe?

Ahead of next Wednesday’s Leviathan debate about the future of Ireland’s relationship with Europe, panelist Jason O’Mahony tells us that it might well be…

Jason O'Mahony

TWO WEEKS AGO, the Taoiseach hosted a summit in Dublin Castle of 18 of the 27 smallest member states in the EU. After two days of earnest negotiation led by him, the summit completed a draft treaty outlining what Ireland and the other countries think the EU should look like, in terms of everything from EuroBonds to dealing with the Democratic Disconnect by electing a President of the EU.

It was a radical but thoughtful document, balancing out the large populations of the big countries with the needs of the small but numerous countries, and was hammered out by consensus. It will now be presented by the Taoiseach, on behalf of the summit, to the next full EU summit.

What do you mean you haven’t heard of any of this? Oh, wait, you wouldn’t have, because that’s not the way Ireland does things. In reality, we wait for the French and the Germans to have their summit and announce their plans, and then we bitch and complain about not being consulted. But do we ever come up with any ideas or plans bigger than trying to get Stuttgart bus drivers to fund Irish translation jobs in Brussels?

No, we don’t. We’re much more at ease with our face in the cold wet muck, leering hatefully at the man going back to his big house, f**ked over once again. No one does victimhood like the Irish, shaking our collective fists at the Brits, Strongbow and the ECB.  See nothing triggers our modern sense of being hard done by more than our relationship with the rest of Europe.

Take our attitude towards the banks. We say it’s not fair that we are bailing out continental banks that took a commercial risk in Ireland, and made plenty of profit during the Tiger years. This is a very fair point, save for the fact that as they lent, we took it. Are we surely at least half responsible? Many people admit as much, but only quietly and after a quick look over their shoulders. A very substantial number of people, including the Taoiseach, believe that Ireland has no responsibility. We built the Celtic Tiger, aren’t we great, oh wait, the wheel’s come off, nothing to do with us, guv. Bloody Germans.

“Yes, 82 million Germans do have more clout than 4.5 million Irish”

We also bang on about how Europe is not democratic, and how Germany has a much greater say than Ireland. Yes, 82 million Germans do have more clout than 4.5 million Irish. Funnily enough, Dublin gets more TDs than Leitrim too. Is that undemocratic?

And, let’s not forget our old favourite, decrying Germany and France for only being interested in themselves. Seriously? Every Irish referendum about the EU is about Ireland standing up for its own national interests, yet we are outraged when other countries do it?

So, what of our future in Europe? Well, it’s tied in with how we see ourselves as a nation, yet another issue we avoid debating because it might involve confronting uncomfortable realities.

We have three main options. We could join the emerging federal Europe, effectively, being let do what we want in our own sandpit whilst a German mammy occasionally slaps us when we don’t play nice.

Or we could join the Brits on the outside when they leave the EU and join the EEA with Norway and Switzerland, which, let’s be honest, is inevitable. We’d still have access to the single market (the rest of Europe will want to sell the Brits cheese and BMWs) and probably end up using Sterling, which at least will help MI5’s employees in the Republican movement with their expenses claims. Of course, we’d have no ministers or European commissioners and just have to transcribe what others decide at the EU table into national law, so you can kiss CAP,  structural funds and all that malarkey goodbye. Sorry, but didn’t we vote Yes to keep commissioners and CAP and all that stuff?

“If we start chucking out their immigrants, they’ll do the same to ours”

Or there’s the big gun: We could go the National Sovereignty route. A nation once again, etc, free from the Brits and the Brussels Bullies and, well, any reason to invest seriously in Ireland with its tiny domestic market. Control over our fishery rights and borders and all the things we had from 1922 until 1972. We could also renege on all our debts whilst we were at it, reintroduce the Punt, which will boost exports whilst making fuel and imported goods more expensive. Of course, austerity on a pain level equivalent to a stubbed toe would be the order of the day, as we would just have to make the national books balance instantly. And don’t forget, if we start chucking Irma from Spar with her spray-on jeans out, it won’t be long before a rake of Paddies get flung back in our direction. After all, if we start chucking out their immigrants, they’ll do the same to ours.

The reality about our attitude to Europe is tied to the fact that we have no real idea what sort of country we want to be. We debate our values in the most superficial sense, never daring to ask what sacrifices are we willing to bear to deliver on those values. We don’t even want to pay for clean drinking water, and regard not letting septic tanks leak shit into our water as being all fancy and la-di-dah, and that is pretty much the issue: We have no idea as to what sort of country we want to be, so how on Earth can we have any idea as to what sort of Europe we want to live in?

Jason O’Mahony is a political activist, blogs at www.Jasonomahony.ie , and was once a member of the nice wing of the Progressive Democrats (Boo!).   He will be a panelist at the Leviathan event in the Sugar Club this Wednesday, 25 April. For more see http://www.leviathan.ie

WIN: Would you like to attend this Leviathan event on Wednesday in Dublin’s Sugar Club? TheJournal.ie has FOUR sets of two tickets to give away:

  • Simply email your name, address and contact number to competitions@thejournal.ie.
  • Please mark your email ‘Leviathan’ in the subject line of your email.
  • Winners will be contacted by lunchtime today (Tuesday). Good luck!

Read next:

Comments (80 Comments)

  • Fagan's 24/04/12 #

    One Problem that the article conveniently ignores is that nearly 40% of the population in the EU feel that the EU/ECB is on the wrong path, same as we do. Nobel Prize winning economists like Paul Krugman accuse the EU leadership of taking the economy on a path of economic suicide.

    As for complaining about the big man in the house (Mr.Germany and Mrs.France), well that is common across the Eurozone. It has even been a source of anger in the EU commission itself and in many countries that us.

    As for your point about the Irish always blaming someone else, there is an element of truth in that. There is also an element of truth that analysis like your Jason is driven by an Irish desire as well to ingrate with the big house, and be ruled, rather than accept responsibility. Both are products of our national lack of self-respect and confidence.

    Reply
  • A good article, but at the same time I don’t think you can compare our 4.5 Mill. people as like for like – not all went mad buying multiple houses, cars, holidays etc… Yet all are being made to feel the pain.

    I think most would take the austerity if there was a true sense of fairness about it. We still see politicians getting away with murder (expenses, perks, tribunals) and no one brought to account, this also applies to the banks.

    I also wouldn’t mind austerity if I knew for a fact that the money saved was being spent wisely, let’s face it, there is still too much wastage and corruption in our public spending and the government still has a knack for just throwing money at problems.

    I also think we as a nation should continue to stand up for ourselves – that is what all the other nations do.

    Still, good article though.

    Reply
  • 1. There is no democracy at Commission or Presidential level in the EU
    2. There is no direct democratic mandate in any EU country for a federal Europe
    3. There is no democratic method to stop Europe from further federalising except saying No to occasional treaties that only offer baby steps in either direction.

    Give the people of Europe, The Big One- a referendum on whether they want a federal Europe or a single market of sovereign states. That is the question we’ve never been asked in plain, bold language. I think I know why…..

    And I was in the nice wing of the PDs too! I think!

    Reply
  • Sounds great……but….. Let’s have all countries in the EU have referendums to see if the public want a federal Europe.
    I think you will find two things:
    1. Of course this vote will never happen.
    2. Even if by a miracle of miracles it did happen, it would be widely rejected in every country, especially in the central countries.
    So the question remains, who is pushing for this federal Europe?
    Patently politicians with zero mandate, who wish to be remembered for something.
    The Euro currency project has failed, EU central banking has failed, the peripheral countries need to devalue, by moving to a Euro 2 currency or back to punt, lira, drachma and peseta.

    Reply
    • Nicely put Gerard, you’ve hit the nail on the head there. It most definitely is time to grow up about Europe. Politicians need to pay attention. The type of EU being pushed by politicians is NOT the type of EU the people of Europe want, as is becoming blatantly apparent at the moment. An EU that enables easy travel and trade between member states is sufficient.

      Reply
  • Interesting article though the author when talking about democracy has nothing to say about when France and Holland voted no to some referendums what their politicians did to get around those results. Democracy in the EU only seems to work if you vote yes….

    Reply
  • Scarr 24/04/12 #

    Good article. I would agree with 99% of what was outlined. Ireland does not know what she wants to be and I think the lack of a new political party representing s new vision plays a part in this. We certainly do not have a leadership competent enough to have us go it alone, we are better off linked to whoever has the most profitable market.

    Reply
    • Ah, best bet, become a staging post for the Chinese invasion…

      Reply
    • I agree. I also agree that our national interest is also served by becoming the “staging post for the Chinese invasion”. I will vote no in the referendum for no otherupted reason that I do not want this or any other government to have the ability to allow us to become indentured servants of the ECB again under any circumstances. And I am 100% positive that by seeking Chinese investment along with forcing our government to not rely on ECB bailout like some strung out junky will set us on the right path for the next century as China takes its position as the dominant world economy. This way we can stay in Europe with a foot in both worlds and not rely on the historic cycles we have been in of “one trick pony” economy we have seen… first it was just agriculture.. then chemicals… then IT and then most recently building… all of which where followed to the exclusion of all others at the time. Now all the government relies on is export.. which again is another pony of a single trick considering we are not a manufacturing country by any stretch of the imagination.

      Reply
    • We were linked to the most profitable market for 10 years. It was called the Celtic Tiger,,,see where that got us?

      Reply
    • No, it’s not a good article, because it attempts to frame the question in the wrong way.

      Specifically, the issue is +not+ about nationalities.

      It is about the interests of wealthy elites, particularly those in the bloated financial sector, versus the majority of working (many now jobless) citizens. It just so happens that the most powerful financial sector interests reside in Germany, but it may surprise people to know that wages & working conditions have been deteriorating there over the last 10 years & unemployment is rising as Germany moves into recession.

      None of this is an accident.

      It is the result of the Euro shared currency system designed by the financial sector interests & foisted on us all by ‘captured’ political leaders & mainstream economics thinking.

      So, let’s see. Why not apply all this Eurozone logic to regions within Ireland?

      Dublin has a far greater population than Kerry, & is far much productive in GDP terms. So, really, isn’t it time those feckless paddys in ‘de kingdom’ copped a dose of Eurozone reality? Why should the efficient, smart, hard working Dubliners be subsidising Kerry’s schools, health services, roads etc.?

      And while we’re at it, let’s apply the same logic to Clare, Donegal & all the rest, eh?

      Of course, it does mean that the economies of of Kerry, Clare, Donegal etc. will shrink dramatically. They won’t be able to buy half the stuff Dublin produces that they used to, but, hey Dublin businesses can just shed a few workers, won’t effect profits much. They all need to learn what ‘competition’ with China means anyway. Talk about lazy Euro workers, those Chinese work twice as long for feck all, & if they talk about ‘unions’, it’s a smack round the kisser & out the door.

      So, yeah, time to ‘grow up about Europe’ and see what way the elites are really taking it.

      BTW Mr O’Mahony, if we were to reintroduce the Punt, we would have no need whatever to ‘balance’ budgets. As +issuer+ of our own currency, we would have no need to borrow from anybody to stimulate & recover our economy to (near) full employment, maximising our prosperity.

      Indeed, the Eurozone has a similar currency issuing entity, the ECB, which if re-mandated could do exactly the same thing. It has just ‘created’ funds to the tune of €1,000 billion (the ‘LTRO’) to give to the banks. There is no ‘economics’ reason it could not do this for the ‘real’ economy. For example, to finance a ‘Job Guarantee’ program (voluntary, with specific conditions) to provide a minimum wage for every unemplyed person in the Eurozone, thus providing the spending stimulus that is now lacking to restore growth.

      But, of course, the banks that are running things don’t want to have their monopoly broken on creating all money as debt, so they can continue to rake in profits, create lucrative boom/bust asset bubbles & all the other ‘extraction’ schemes they run which provide no useful service to the real economy.

      (Ergo,,,vote NO if you want to start to change all this.)

      Reply
    • ”Take our attitude towards the banks. We say it’s not fair that we are bailing out continental banks that took a commercial risk in Ireland, and made plenty of profit during the Tiger years. This is a very fair point, save for the fact that as they lent, we took it. Are we surely at least half responsible?”

      No
      We are about .00000001 % responsible.
      Since stupid private,criminal and corrupt ”Irish” banks decided to lend €75 Billion to 850 of NAMA’s Pets with little to no due diligence.
      Please note: that this does not include a similar amount loaned to these 850 by U.K. and other non Irish owned banks.

      Joe Public were inconsequential in this scam.
      They were only used as Debt Mules by greedy, corrupt bankers to boost their commissions
      and to buy a few badly built, Squats with artificially inflated prices from cowboy builders (the banker’s golfing buddies).

      Reply
    • Tell me Jason.
      If Pat Neary our ex (now conveniently forgotten) financial regulator, our bankers, our Government and their ”Auditors” were 100% criminally culpable,
      how could we be half responsible?

      Reply
    • @ Mike Hall.
      I agree with your view that we should vote no in the referendum.
      I also agree that we need to look at currency solutions for Ireland as we will inevitably have to face the reality, by default or design, of living without the, now failing, Euro. However, I don’t believe that an Irish government issued fiat currency will work for a number of reasons, but primarily because it will have less value per m.sq than toilet paper.
      “people have lost faith in the 20th century religion of government backed fiat money.” Matthew Bishop, US editor ‘The Economist’

      Reply
    • @ Sean

      The thing is we have never had a true fully operational ‘fiat’ system of money.

      Rather, a bastardised version where governments (effectively under the control of financial sector elites) pretend they don’t have fiat currency together with a private financial sector allowed to do whatever it wants with fiat currency. The financial sector had the benefits (& abused them), but the public sector had none.

      Of course ‘fiat’, even in this form, is a relatively modern phenomena, dating from only 1971 when the Bretton Woods system was dropped.

      The problem is that, historically, none of the slightly varying systems of ‘metal’ backed currencies have prevented asset/debt bubbles & financial crises. Eg. the Wall St crash & Great Depression that followed. and there were many others before that.

      Any money system thus requires proper regulation & vigilance, driven & maintained by a functioning democracy.

      Right now, with the real economies tanking & unemplyment rising, the priority should be restoring prosperity. Were it’s potential to be fully utilised, rather than restrained by ideology, ignorance & vested interests, for the public sector, prosperity, real standards of living, could be quickly restored.

      Metal backed currencies, in this situation, cannot & do not help in any way. Rather, they represent a continuation, or even acceleration, of the current ‘austerity’ policies which are destroying the Eurozone especially & in a ‘lighter’ form, perpetuating the misery in the UK, US & elsewhere, not suffering under a shared currency system not fit for purpose.

      However, I suggest we ‘agree to disagree’ on such detail, & focus instead on demanding the debate for radical reform of the failed Euro shared currency system? (Failed because it has a structure that we would not countenance in sharing a currency between our own counties in Ireland. As would no other country within its own borders.)

      That is, as you say, we all should vote NO, as it’s the only democratic option we’ll have to do this for some time.

      Reply
    • @ Mike, Sean,
      Ireland could try the ‘competition of currencies’, let the most popular currency survive without a set legal tender currency decided by the Minister for Finance. Let there be metal backed currencies, fiat currencies, commodity basket backed and property backed currencies let the markets decide which wins.

      Reply
  • This line really finished it for me: ” We don’t even want to pay for clean drinking water”. So, whos paid for our clean drinking water up till now Jason? More blueshirt ‘repeat the same lie often enough…..’ bullcrap. We’ve always paid for it, through taxation instead of directly per household. Different method, thats all. And when the tax take disappeared, the universal social charge was imposed to make up the shortfall. Now, inda and the boys steal our taxes that cover the cost of clean water to cover bankers gambling losses then demand we pay twice for the same thing, while columnists claim we don’t want to pay for it once.

    Oooooh, great article…..

    Reply
  • What about a default and euro exit? It seems it would satisfy the knee-jerk left (we’re not paying for bankers/govt. mistakes) and right (there would be no money to pay SW and PS etc.). Swift return to international competitiveness instead of a decade or more of austerity and decline. People will accept punt devaluation more readily than pay cuts. Or is the general consensus that we want a better bailout deal?

    Reply
    • I would say that a good bailout deal will be the preferred option for ever. We will never be able to cope with a balanced budget from where we are now. Such a budget will involve many years of real hardship for the less well off. At a micro level, how many families would be in poverty if they had a balanced budget, that meaning they spent only what they earned. Wages in the public system are too high from the perspective of the level of taxes collected. This is likely to remain the case. Ireland has not lived within its means for the past 30 years, how can it start doing it now?

      Reply
    • Fagan's 24/04/12 #

      Terry. That is not exactly correct. We ran a surplus for most of the 90′s and did live within our means up till about 2002-2003.

      Reply
    • We were in receipt of structural/regional funds from eu during the 90′s. Have you taken that into account?

      Reply
    • Terry I agree that a disorderly default would cause terrible hardship for many, but that is what many seem to be advocating. I would gain a lot from a decoupling from the euro, but most would not. At the same time we can’t borrow our way out of debt. I really don’t know what the answer is and I am mystified by the attitudes of many on here. Memories seem to be conveniently short!

      Reply
  • Nice wing of the PD’s? Ha!

    Reply
  • This is the typical tripe that comes from an EU bandit. The seems to be this consensus in Ireland that we just aren’t good enough and we beat ourselves down at every opportunity. It is this defeatist attitude that will suppress our economy for years to come. It seems we cant live with the EU and we cant live without it, yet it has become a bueaurocratic monster of unelected elites with no accountability to anyone. I will tell you what I dont want and thats a federal Europe.

    Reply
  • We as a nation need to be more critically engaged at the European level. We need to be positively putting forward ideas about how we think things should be done. As a country that hasn’t gone around invading its neighbours, we don’t have much historical baggage and would be well positioned to be a constructive voice with no agenda.

    We as Irish people also need to be more critically and constructively engaged in the national discourse. We do have responsibilities and duties as well as rights.

    A couple of nights ago, I was in a discussion in another online forum where various contributors were sneering at the government that so many people professed not to understand the Fiscal Treaty. I got into quite a row when – God between us and all harm – I suggested that if people didn’t know anything about it, they might get off their backsides and go and read up on it. If you’re able to access the internet, and obviously those I was arguing with were, there’s no excuse. There are various summaries out there that could be read in a few minutes.

    Reply
    • We have been critically engaged for many years as a recipient of EU funds even as we mismanaged our economy appallingly. I’m afraid Ireland’s importance and reputation in Europe is not quite what we would all wish.

      Reply
    • We weren’t *critically* engaged. We just went alone with the status quo because times were good and everyone was rolling along in cruise control. If it ain’t broke, why fix it?

      Tom, yeah…there are only 4.5 million of us. We’re not going to change Europe on our own. That’s why we need to be building those alliances with other small nation states.

      I think we’re too inclined to beat ourselves up over our economic crisis – too inclined to believe that we’re irreparably damaged.

      Yes, mistakes were made by Irish regulatory authorities (and people need to held accountable) but we’re not the first country to do that. The Swedes and Finns – often held up as models for us – also had economic crises in the 1990s as a result of economic mismanagement. Those wonderfully productive South Koreans had a huge economic crisis in the late 1990s and needed a bailout. They all survived. I wonder if they engaged in this frenzy of national self-flagellation that we’re doing.

      Reply
    • Ciaran it’s no surprise that the general mood has turned from the embarrassing hubris of five years ago to the gloom of today. We need to take a more realistic view. Positive thinking will not change the pretty stark economic situation we are in. Since the possible outcomes here will be governed by political considerations largely beyond our control (or possibly by seismic and unpredictable market turns) it all adds to the uncertainty and anxiety – as well as the amount of speculative BS being spouted.

      Reply
  • Ah the ole drivel of putting our society down is back again. While some of his points are true alot of it is absolute one sided crap. So because Germany is bigger we should just shut up and be good little boys? The problem with our own government is they don’t look after our interests in the EU, not that any other country does! Ironic also that he talks about the supposed bad traits of the average Irish society, forgetting that he is portraying the biggest one in abundance – negativity and self loathing. This is not an article, it’s a rant!

    Reply
    • Fagan's 24/04/12 #

      Bend your Knee boyo, your only being a bad resentful paddy with that comment. Same as the nearly 60% of Germans who now think the introduction of the Euro in 99 was a bad idea in retrospect, like the new PM of Spain who is against the Fiscal Treaty. All bad Paddy’s.

      There is a lot of self-loathing, negative bollox in his article. No doubt about that, it’s the root of all the problems in this country. Certainly we as a nation need to take responsibility for our actions and needs. However the gom wing of politics are obsessed with either handing control back to London or over to Brussels. Ever the Employee and never the Employer.

      Reply
    • Dave 24/04/12 #

      Love it Fagan’s. And so true. Am fed up to my back teeth of the closet unionist nonsense.

      Reply
    • What the article actually says is that we need to be more critically engaged. If we don’t like what the French and Germans are proposing, let’s come up with our own ideas. The vast majority of countries in the EU have populations of 10 million or less so there’s a huge potential out there for building alliances.

      We’re by no means the only member state fuming in silence at the status quo.

      Reply
    • censored 25/04/12 #

      What’s the forum for contributing to the development of the EU in the current circumstances?

      Markel/Sarkozy and the ECB have scrapped all semblance of democracy, they have been bypassing the EU parliament and commission since the crisis began.

      Reply
  • I am sorry did Ireland cause the credit crunch I don’t think so. The only reason the Germans want us to not default is so they don’t have to bail out there own banks. We are just a drop in the ocean of there own debt but they have enough liquidity to cover some not all of it. The credit crunch happened when investors realise the financial market is drowning in derivatives and credit default swaps which are still being used, so the banks are still not lending to each other. If you remember what Ireland did in 2008 was make a promise to the banks that all there debt would be covered so all the money we had saved up and it was quite a bit over 42 billion was swallowed up over the space of two years by these banks as Ireland was used as a tipping point by some larger banks and others to clear some of the really toxic debt and our government was rolled over and we accepted everything the special advisers told us. With the two brian’s unable to comprehend what was going on they accepted all the advice given to them by vested interests such as “you cannot let any banks fail” . Hindsight is a great thing but the mistakes made four years ago are what caused this crisis trying to pin it on the people is what is most distressing. Now hold on a minute sure we “did all go mad” didn’t we, yeah sure if people keep saying it, it must be true.

    Reply
  • “they lent we took it” during the fake Celtic tiger years….speak for yourself buddy!! Plenty of decent hard working people did not take a penny of this fake money as they knew they could not pay it back. Speak for yourself and think before you speak!

    Reply
  • What a smarmy article! Isn’t it time we stopped listening to unqualified people telling us what we would stand to lose by leaving Europe, and projecting the worst alternatives. We could get a bloody backbone for starters and not listen to this tripe. The most condescending tone in an article for a long time. In one decade we have lost everything by joining the euro and we have thirty years of austerity in our future, to pay back money to god knows who, because their investments failed and the last shower were bullied into signing guarantees for them. I would rather we stood on our on feet and took a bloody chance rather than be thrown titbits from passer-bys in Germany and France. There is no point in a union where the smallest never get a game.

    Reply
    • Scarr 24/04/12 #

      We don’t have a competent enough leadership to go it alone, without the likes of microsoft etc we would be up the creek totally. Those companies come here for beneficial taxes and access to the eu, they are also keeping the numbers better than they are in reality. To go it alone we would end up looking like kazakhstan.

      Reply
  • “We have no idea as to what sort of country we want to be, so how on Earth can we have any idea as to what sort of Europe we want to live in?”

    We have been given no real choice in deciding what sort of country we want to be in, and we certainly have no choice in the Europe we want to be part of. Any time the people of Ireland have impressed their opinion contrary to our “leaderships” desires we have had it forced down our throats until we concede. A previous poster is correct , we need a new party in this country, we have to get this shower (FF/FG/L) out of our faces, and don’t get me started on SF. As things stand the beatings will continue until moral improves.

    Reply
  • I read Jason’s blog regularly. While he often makes some interesting points and funny blog entries, one regular feature of his writing that I don’t enjoy is his scorn for the Irish people and the Irish electorate which is again evident in the above piece

    “We’re much more at ease with our face in the cold wet muck, leering hatefully at the man going back to his big house, f**ked over once again. No one does victimhood like the Irish, shaking our collective fists at the Brits, Strongbow and the ECB.”

    I really don’t think it is an accurate or fair portrayal of Ireland, it is more of a caricature.

    Reply
  • i have to agree with Martin mac. i didn’t take any money during the Celtic tiger. i was prudent so why should i say for the rest of the idiots! buyer beware did any one ever hear of that?

    Reply
  • A lot of unfairness in this article, delivered in a smug, condemning superior tone.
    I believe many of us did not engage in borrowing large sums of money to speculate and build up a portfolio of property. Most of Those that did borrow money borrowed it to pay for one overpriced home, and made the transaction on the back of fear that if prices continued to soar as they had, they would never have the chance to own their own home, and remember, paying a mortgage was cheaper than renting in most cases. The majority of the losses incurred by our banks that were then foisted on the taxpayer, were almost solely owned by a handful of developers. I will never accept that we ‘went mad ‘ as enda so helpfully told the world on an international stage! Holding this opinion does not mean I have childish views about Europe. It means my eyes are open and what I see is that Ireland should come first in all our considerations in amendments to our constitution, which is there to protect the people of ireland, not enslave them.

    Reply
  • And yet those same people have to contribute to fixing the situation. Clearly there is no reward for being prudent, much better off with incontinent spending so you have nothing for them to take eh?

    Reply
  • You say, Jason, that we are at least half responsible because we gladly took the money the Germans and international banks loaned us. I think it’s safe to say that we are profoundly paying for our foolishness, whilst the banks and the greedy speculators are being payed back even though they are at least half responsible!

    Reply
  • Richard 24/04/12 #

    ‘We’.

    You don’t speak for me, Jason.

    Reply
  • Having a different opinion to you on our place in Europe does not mean Irish people need to ‘grow up’.

    Yes, you are a right wing hawk who believes that the Irish population should lay down and take decades of austerity, suffer for debts that aren’t ours and keep our mouths shut whilst writing cheques for whatever indirect tax the Troika dreams up next. And for what – the good of an elite leaving in the leafy boulevards of Lyon or Hanover?

    I’m not confused about where I would like to see Ireland – as a small and proud state with complete fiscal independence, refusing to pay bank debt that’s not ours, extricated from the Euro and with closer ties forged to London and Washington.

    Your article should win an award for smugness though, it’s no wonder you were a PD!

    Reply
    • Scarr 24/04/12 #

      @g Charles – you say that you would like to see us exit the euro and snuggle up to the us and uk. Who would you see leading the country through this awkward phase and do you not think that exiting the euro would lead to a reduction in multi nationals setting up here, without whom, we’d be much deeper in recession?

      Reply
    • Scarr 24/04/12 #

      @red thumbers – what’s with the thumbs down? I’m asking a question and stating an economic fact, if you disagree then respond.

      Reply
    • Here we go again, all huff and puff about “standing up” to Europe looking only at the benefits and not at the consequences. Exactly what this article is about!

      Reply
    • The writer of the article must of left the PD’s and joined FG as David seems to love him as much as Enda

      Reply
    • Europe’s population as a whole looks like it’s beginning to stand up to European politicians, at last. Gerard Murphy’s comment above is concise, to the point and correct. not “huff and puff” about it. You could also argue the same of those who want a Federal Europe, only looking at the immediate benefit and not the future consequences. The problems with the Euro have not been fixed, the proposed fiscal compact doesn’t do anything to rectify those problems, therefore pushing for a Federal Europe now will fail. Politicians don’t seem to see that, which is odd because if you do even a small bit of research it becomes obvious that the EU is on the wrong path.There are many valid reasons not to push on with tighter integration within the EU.

      Reply
  • Political activist? Where’s the political argument? This sorry column is a pitiful farrago of cartoon stereotype. Perhaps you might have something valid (politically and otherwise) to contribute if you got a (useful) job yourself…?

    Reply
  • Poor article I thought. But I guess it wasnt meant to be much more. Is the EU project doomed if Germany keeps trying to use a currency that gives it an unfair advantage? Will southern european countries be made to continue using a currency that is too strong for their economy? This game will continue. More poor countries like Croatia, Serbia and Romania coming into the EU. This only suits Germany keeping the euro low in value so it can export to these new countries. These places then take over the tourist markets from Southern europe as they are cheaper options. The whole project has to be questioned. All along it suited business interests and they pushed the agenda. Time to stop and ask where we will be in 20 or 50 years time.

    Reply
  • The article puts forward many valid points but ignores others.
    The Euro has been disasterous for all periphery euro-zone nations except Finland (which had it’s crisis in the 90′s and is wedged between stable Sweden and booming Russia).
    The Euro crisis would have an adversely effect even without our homegrown crisis.
    Demographic incompatiblity between core European nations and ourselves. Nations such as Germany are facing an impending pensions crisis. This informs their need to save banks at all costs. Irelands young workforce will have to remain underemployed waiting on a solution that does not require the creative destruction of the banking system.
    Ireland requires deflation to return to growth (drive down costs, wages & prices). The ECB is pursuing inflationary policies.
    Ireland requires a greater degree of autonomy to find Irish solutions to resolve this crisis and to protect our economy from further detoriation in the eurozone economy. Ceding more fiscal powers is the opposite of what we need.
    Hans Werner-Sinn offers a more Euro-centered perspective on the nature and scale of Europes crisis.

    http://www.international-economy.com/TIE_W12_Sinn.pdf

    Reply
  • Reasoned debate on an article about Europe? Comments agreeing and disagreeing in a civilised manner? The normal contributors with their flow of bitter whining that makes debate impossible mustn’t be up yet…

    Reply
  • One of the worst articles I have read on here in long time. It is a rant, and as if you ensure appeal to the lowest common denominator it has curse words. It presents three options based on speculation, ignores over 40 years of European history and misunderstands federalism. I will skip
    Leviathan, thanks,

    Reply
  • I don’t like the article ! It is biased and one sided . However we must be seen to stand up for ourselves

    Reply
  • Agree with a lot of this article. We need to decide where we are going and as for bloody referendums we didn’t need any when the structural funds were pouring in.

    Reply
  • Typical smug elitist shite from a enthralled Eurolover seeking to justify his beloved progressive EU screwing the general Irish population. This article reeks of the post-colonialist inferiority complex characteristic of our comprador elite, which entails blaming everything on imagined deficiencies in the Irish psyche so as to put us proles in our place and allow them to continue managing their clientelistic relationships with the big boy capitalists in Europe. Points above about the real faultline in Europe being class rather than nationality-based are spot on.

    Reply
  • An Excellent article. Why would media not report on Kenny initiative?

    Reply
  • Very good article, its true, poor old paddy doesn’t know he wants or how to go about it, never has. “Independence” was a disaster for us, no idea how to govern ourselves, too many vested interests and parochial sleevens turned this fine country into a narrow minded authoritanian dictatorship practically. I wonder if we got home rule or some sort of dissolved assembly would we have turned out better, governing ourselves with a helping hand. Doesn’t seem to have done the Welsh or the Scots any harm

    Reply
  • I STOPPED READING AFTER THE FIRST CURSE WORD!

    Reply
  • Richard 24/04/12 #

    ‘Our immigrants’

    ‘We’ don’t own them, you know, even if they don’t get to vote in a treaty that directly affects them.

    Reply
  • O'Reilly 24/04/12 #

    Lots of we didn’t party comments. Just wondering then where the 190 Bn of household debt came from? 27 Bn of it personal debt – credit cards, personal loans and the like. True, not everybody partied. But many did…

    Reply
    • censored 25/04/12 #

      If you only have one house, and you have an excessive mortgage due to the economic conditions created by the former troika of FF politicians/developers/banks – would you call that partying?

      Reply
  • Not sure I agree with the arguments of victimhood, we were led down a bad road by our political leaders during the boom.

    Having said that this article should be an important eye opener to the benefits of Europe and that other countries naturally look out for number one. European Politics is unfortunately a slow game of finding consensus between half a billion people. We will never always get our way just as much as Leitrim never always gets its way over a Dublin centered political system. But can Leitrim go it alone as a country? Likewise can Ireland really go it alone outside of the EU or outside of the Euro?

    It’s a debate we need to have but I feel it’s not something we can risk testing during such a crisis. There are worthy points around leaving the Euro etc, but I think they need to be left until we’re out of the crisis. Too much at stake to throw a nationalist rant and pull out. It sends all the wrong signals to the world and to investors.

    And don’t tell me for a second “we don’t need their money”. We do!

    Reply

Add New Comment