TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

VIDEO: Róisín Shortall’s not-so-ringing endorsement of James Reilly

The junior health minister voted in favour of James Reilly last night – but only after a four-minute critique of his performance.




THIS IS THE SPEECH given by Róisín Shortall TD, the Minister of State for Primary Care, in the Dáil last night. She was speaking during a debate on a motion of no confidence in the Minister for Health – her boss – James Reilly.

During her four-minute speech, Shortall did not reference Reilly once, nor affirm her support for him. She nonetheless voted in Reilly’s favour in both of the votes taken on the motion.

The government faces a huge challenge to manage and reform the health service when the health budget is being reduced.

As part of that process, a key question arises for us all: Who will bear the burden of the cuts? Do we increase prescription charges for medical card patients, for example, or instead reduce the drugs bill? Do we cut public health nurses, or instead collect money owed by insurance companies? Do we cut home help services, or instead impose a cap on consultants pay?

Our priority must be to protect frontline services. We cannot cut our way out of problems. We must reform, and that reform must happen quickly. Unless there is substantial reform, there will be cuts and the poor will be the hardest hit.

Reform means reducing costs and changing the model of care, to switch the focus from acute hospitals to community and primary care. This will ensure early diagnosis and much better value for money. That is why the Programme for Government prioritises primary care in the term of this government.

To deliver on the programme we need fully-staffed primary care teams, working from modern primary care centres. That is why we must recruit the 300 frontline primary care staff to areas of greatest need. Staff such as public health nurses, speech and language therapists, and occupation therapists. Staff for whom funding was provided this year.

Thousands of people – children and adults – are on waiting lists for these services. It’s time we started the recruitment. Decisions on where staff are allocated, and where primary care centres are located, must be transparent and objective based on health need and no other consideration. Primary care centres, just like schools, are essential public infrastructure and should be provided on the same basis.

The programme for government commits to extending free GP care to all in this government’s term. We know that fees stop people attending their GPs, so they eventually need more expensive hospital care. Private fees for GPs are just 2% of national health spending, but their removal unlocks the potential for major reforms.

The lack of priority afforded to producing the Free GP legislation has been very disappointing. Allocated funding must be restored to start this key initiative this year. We must also have a clear roadmap that charts the road forward and ends the uncertainty about the future.

These are just some of the questions that need to be resolved. Are we going to reform and strengthen our public health services, or privatise large parts of it? How do we assure equity and access in the health service? What model of universal health insurance best suits the situation here in Ireland? Should it be a commercial insurance model or a social insurance model? What will replace the HSE? And how best can we control costs?

Reform of healthcare, I think as we all know, is never straightforward. Decisions taken by the government over the next few months will determine the shape of the future healthcare system. That will determine the shape of the system for years to come. We have to get it right. Reform must be made in the best interests of patients.

Read: Reilly wins confidence vote as Taoiseach and Tánaiste state their support

Read next:

Comments (44 Comments)

  • These are the type of people we do not need in government. She basically gives out about him for 4 minutes, them support him in the vote.

    Nothing will ever change.

    Reply
  • James Reilly: “If you say that to me again, I’ll put your head through the wall”.

    Reply
  • Mary Harney divided and partly privatised a weak health system. Shortall at least seems committed to delivering public health services and reforming structures. Reilly is too close to the system, he has been part of it, I dont trust him and dont think he is capable of doing what needs to be done. in particular Shortalls question about universal cover is worrying – this should be well advanced by now. What is happening with universal cover? Little or nothing as far as I can see….

    Reply
  • what’s the point in voting in government the people voted her there of their own free will and judgement so she would use her own judgements and vote accordingly. been forced to vote with Ur leader is a farce why be in dail in the first place then. forget about voting and let enda do what he wants and save all the acting of ministers pretending like its there choice what way the vote. democracy my ass

    Reply
  • Could it be lowly TD 93 k plus expenses,Minister of state 130 K plus expenses,maybe her vote was for her pay cheque instead of Reilly.

    Reply
  • This lady kinda bugs me..Its clear she hates O’Reilly and this is coming out in every sentence of her statement… My question to her is… ‘What are you doing about it?’ She is a Minister also but it seems to me that she wants to be the super popular defender of the masses as opposed to being a person who makes hard decsions. People like her would be eaten alive in the private sector….They cant get rid of her but if it was a private company and the number 2 in the company spoke that way about the number 1….They would get the boot….and correctly so becasue leaders cant have this sort of stuff.

    Reply
  • This reminds of the Greens who had the chance to pull the plug on the last government but didn’t.

    Reply
  • With business and financial background i’d love to go to a hse run “business” for a day & point out all the holes. Not against nurses/docs etc they work hard, but all the other waste

    Reply
    • Deirdre
      What a nonsensical and self promoting statement that suggests little other than your lack of business qualification.
      Before you even start your investigation you have decided the problems in the HSE lie outside the domains of doctors and nurses. You dismiss them as some favourite form of Healthcare worker and move on to the first piece of prejudice your lazy mind can think of.
      That’s the problem Deirdre in the entirety of our so called analyses of what and who are wrong . We never look at the entirety of a process and deconstruct it before trying imaginative rebuilds to see if the work flow or performance can be improved.
      No in you jump with your two big feet and exclude key players from the analysis. Would that be the way you earn your current living Derdre.

      Reply
  • Ms. Shortall calls for reform & equity in the health service, yet as a member of the Labour Party she supports the greatest obstacle to both reform and equity – The Croke Park Agreement. There are 17,000 administration staff in the HSE – many with little to do (source of fact: The McCarthy Report). These are Job-for-Life and Gold Plated Pension people who are afforded protection like Fort Knox by Labour’s colleagues, the Public Sector Unions.

    If James Reilly could make compulsory redundancies and cut pay at the HIGHER salary levels, then he could afford to recruit the front-line staff mentioned by Ms. Shortall and protect patient services. Labour bent over for the unions again this week by agreeing that only one allowance out of 1,100 would be cut. I wonder what was so extraordinarily unique about that allowance.

    So is it Labour’s way or the welfare of patients?

    Reply
  • Well her comments were better thn the opposition’s she said it how it is. If she did vote in favour she wd hve been kicked out of her party.

    Reply
  • She voted confidence in the minister end of story.

    Reply
  • I listened to her speech and taken standing alone its a very good speech and she talks about reform and a better healthcare system but then apparently she voted confidence in the minister and thats where this is flawed. The whole thing is skewed. If she made that speech not in relation to a no confidence motion I think we all would agree what it proposes but in the context on the motion of no confidence it becomes diluted.

    Reply
  • What a waste of time and we are paying for it. Its amazing that the minister could spend that much time talking and not address the core issue. Labour are quite willing to put frontline staff and patients in the firing line by avoiding taking on the Croke Park deal.

    Reply
  • I suppose at least she got to speak her mind and get her message out – whether that will achieve anything?
    I’d say those bully boyo’s in FG put the pressure on her too

    Reply
  • Watching the absolutely hapless defence of the James Reilly/Roisin Shorthall relationship by Eamon Gilmore on leaders questions now, wont even answer a straight question from Dara Callery. They are doing now what they gave out to Fianna Fail for over the previous 14 years in dodging answers and towing a party line, every question comes back to what they inherited and the mess they are trying to clear up, no doubt come the next election that will be their excuse for not living up to all their empty promises, change my backside

    Reply
    • Fianna Fail …… Richie you having a laugh !!!!! Lets not forget who ruined this country with breath taking ignorance and arrogance

      Reply
    • I’m not forgetting but this is now and that was then, we have a seriously diminished opposition which is bad for government but in fairness Callery was asking a fair question today but got no answer, if the roles were reversed Gilmore would be having a caniption, same old same old

      Reply
    • Did Dara Callery ask any question of his own Party when they Ruinned a nation ??? They ran like rats from a sinkin ship and wouldnt stand for re_election , and that fat hippo Harney was FF’s puppet on a string .. shame on anbody you tries to defend FF

      Reply
    • 1) I am not defending Fianna Fail, I am making an observation on a current issue and today’s leaders questions.
      2) Dara Callery appeared on The Week in Politics one Sunday night last Winter and held his hands up to the failings of the last government, now that might not do anybody much good but sure if he didn’t do it plenty would highlight his failure to recognise in some way same said failures. FF TD’s are in a no win scenarios and that situation will remain for some time yet. Rarely has any member of any political party in Government been self critical. Give credit to Frank Feighan, Tommy Broughan, Mattie McGrath etc they have bucked the trend but they are a minority I’m afraid
      3) I am not a Mary Lou or Sinn Fein fan either but she made a valid point to the Tanaiste today, stop making reference to the past failings of Fianna Fail, we all know those failures and have been over it many times, it’s time to sort out the problems and not blame the lack of any tangible progress on the mess inherited, time enough has passed now to see change but I see very very little. This present government, thus far, are making no better a fist of it than the last

      Reply
  • @Gavin ,was only joking. It did sound mad though.

    Reply
  • alan 20/09/12 #

    shortall has no power

    except one: she can stand down on a matter of principle

    and, yes, that would be productive because it would lead to genuine debate over labours role in govt. a badly needed debate which members want (judging by some of the news realting to that partys internal affairs)

    Reply
  • This was just an exercise by the opposition to put Labour under pressure by backing Reilly so they can through it back in their faces in future, and create doubt. Some great shit stirring. No less than this spineless coalition needs.

    Reply
  • Any credit due to Roisin Shorthall for ‘saying it as it is’ must be completely eroded by her actions in voting confidence in the Minister.
    Actions speak louder than words!?!?
    Pathetic actually

    Reply
  • actions speak louder than words and as she voted for Reilly, nothing will ever change in Governments unless our politicians stand up for what they say they believe in!!

    Reply
  • Labour are as corrupt as the rest of them !!! What I would like to know is why had none of the main stream news reported this http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2005451/Bernard-Lynch-serves-assistant-junior-minister-wife-served-year-bars.html

    Reply
  • Other then the fact that it makes for some very interesting reading regarding the way the conviction was overturned the side that should really get up everyone’s nose is his wife hired him to work for her ! Money for old rope there ! The whole system is corrupt and getting worse by the day !!

    Reply
  • * THROW IT BACK, SORRY

    Reply
  • Nappy 20/09/12 #

    remember drink is going up an awful lot in next budget because of her ####

    Reply

Add New Comment