TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

Observers give Romney the victory in first US presidential debate

Straw polls show two-thirds of people saying Mitt Romney beat Barack Obama – the highest post-debate record ever.

President Barack Obama, right and Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney chat following the first presidential debate at the University of Denver. Observers called the debate for Romney, giving fresh hopes to his presidential campaign.
President Barack Obama, right and Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney chat following the first presidential debate at the University of Denver. Observers called the debate for Romney, giving fresh hopes to his presidential campaign.
Image: David Goldman/AP

MITT ROMNEY has breathed new life into his campaign for the US presidency with a robust performance in the first debate against the incumbent Barack Obama.

Romney was deemed by CNN viewers to have easily won the debate held in Colorado – with 67 per cent of viewers saying the Republican candidate had come out on top, compared to a mere 25 per cent offering the win to the Democrats’ Obama.

CNN polling director Keating Holland noted that this was by far the most one-sided verdict given by any post-debate crowd since the network began polling in 1984. No candidate had ever been awarded the victory by more than 60 per cent of voters before.

35 per cent of those watching said they were now more likely to vote for Romney after his strong showing, compared to 18 per cent for Obama. The other 47 per cent of viewers said, however, that the debate would not influence their vote.

The boost for Romney could come at a welcome time – with only a month to go until polling day, the latest figures from pollster Gallup showed Obama holding a four-point lead over Romney, 49 to 45. Gallup’s numbers are compiled based on an average of the previous seven daily polls.

Analysis will be keen to see how the debate influences those numbers – particularly in key swing states like Florida, Ohio and North Carolina. The former pair are both leaning toward Obama, while North Carolina polls are tied. Romney will hope to take all three if he is to unseat the president.

Romney wasted no time in laying into Obama’s record in his four years in office, insisting that Obama’s “status quo” economic policies were “not going to cut it” – while also accosting the president for allegedly manipulating facts about his proposals for education funding.

The president responded with accusations of his own, however.

“At some point the American people have to ask themselves: Is the reason Governor Romney is keeping all these plans secret, is it because they’re going to be too good? Because middle class families benefit too much? No.”

There were also the typical disputes about each candidates’ own economic platforms, with both candidates claiming the other had misrepresented their fiscal policies.

US media noted that the exchanges were less abrasive than in previous electoral debates, however – with the discussion occasionally verging into dense policy discussions that were difficult for moderator Jim Lehrer to referee.

While observers were surprised at Obama’s failure to attack Romney’s infamous “47 per cent” remark – where the Republican appeared to write off his responsibility to almost half of US voters – Romney also opted against attacking Obama for his “you didn’t build that” statement which had been interpreted by Republicans as an attack on the initiative of everyday Americans.

Despite appearing to speak for longer than his challenger, however, Obama did not appear to land any killer punch – and will hope to put more of a dent in Romney’s challenge in the remaining two debates, held in two weeks’ time in New York and in three weeks’ time in Florida.

The two men’s running mates, Democratic vice-president Joe Biden and the Republican congressman Paul Ryan, will square off next Thursday in Kentucky.

Read: A full transcript of last night’s debate (New York Times)

Watch: Top 5 moments from US presidential debates

Read next:

Comments (65 Comments)

  • Niall 04/10/12 #

    Read an interesting comment elsewhere that Obama deliberately lost the first debate as he knows winning the later ones are far more important. It softens his image and he doesn’t look like an aggressive black man to white undecideds. Don’t be surprised if he mops the floor with mitt the twit the closer we get to the election.

    Reply
    • The first debate is the most important because of the TV ratings it attracts. In 2000, 46m watched the first debate but of that figure, 10m didn’t watch the second. Obama’s supporters haven’t spent over $1 billion in their campaign to have over 50m people watch him “lose a debate on purpose”.

      Reply
    • Let’s hope so, the thought of having Mitt ‘let’s bomb Iran’ Romney in power is a scary prospect.

      Reply
    • Emmet ‘Mitt’ Purcell

      Reply
    • Niall 04/10/12 #

      Emmet, Reagan apparently did it as a strategy in his first live tv debate and bush 11 did it against Kerry. A vote for Mitt will be an insanely stupid decision by American voters. Either way Obama will pull through.

      Reply
    • Was this interesting comment made before or after the debate?

      Sounds like Obama camp spin to me.

      Reply
    • @GaryMason I was a big supporter of Obama a few years ago and I’m undecided for this election. I’m just pointing out some of weird barbs from some of the Obama supporters here – that Romney is somehow a “redneck” or that Obama lost on purpose. If you’re an Obama supporter you should angry and disappointed at him – as many on my Twitter timeline were last night – not trying to spin things.

      Reply
    • David, interestingly, rumours that Obama was planning on deliberately throwing the first debate have been circulating for about a week now. I don’t believe them though.

      As far as I can see Obama made the inexcusable mistake of assuming that Romney wouldn’t dare make the same fabricated claims he’s been making in his stump speeches on an actual debate stage with the other candidate present. He was totally unprepared (from what I’ve seen – I haven’t watched it all yet) and came across as confounded by them.

      In my view, as someone who wants him to win, that really was unforgivably sloppy: he should have had his first order of business in prep being to memorize a list of all Romney’s known mistruths and the hard fact to rebut them with.

      Reply
    • Thats ridiculous! The domestic situation is whats going to get him re-elected. Why would he throw the domestic policy debate, specifically the debate that covers economic plans?

      Reply
    • @ Niall.. Very true.. I didn’t watch the debate but I heard how Obama never mentioned the ’47%’ .. that was key and he left it out for a reason I think..

      Reply
    • Niall 04/10/12 #

      Obama left out so so much crap he could have used against Romney. It seems to me he was deliberately holding back. He has tonnes of ammo for the next two in which mitt will have left the good stuff in debate number one.

      Reply
    • censored 04/10/12 #

      lf Obama really threw the first debate then that was an appalling miscalculation. On a par with his stupid belief that he could get Republicans to work with him in the best interests of the country. Romney is a disaster in waiting, but Obama is a huge disappointment.

      Reply
    • Monaghan, I read your comments. Who is the “redneck”? Romney or Obama? It’s not clear. I think Romney is the redneck.

      Reply
  • The 47% percent of people who said it wouldn’t influence their vote must be those guys Romney was talking about at that dinner a few weeks ago.

    Reply
  • Think Obama was very relaxed, maybe too relaxed but just hope he knows what he’s doing cause god help us all if Romney wins we could seriously have WWIII with some of his foreign policy stand points

    Reply
    • Was it not Obama who was talking about bombing Pakistan during his last campaign? Most Irish peace loving lefties were entirely unperturbed and yet now Romney gets your knickers in the twist with pretty much the same idea. At least Romney picked an adversary, unlike that fool Obama who wanted to bomb (and then indeed bombed) an ally.

      Reply
    • I would not call Pakistan an ally of the USA by any stretch of the imagination. They’re merely friends by circumstance due to their common enemy in the Taliban and, if it wasn’t for that, the ‘I will pay 150 thousand dollars to have a US citizen killed’ government in Pakistan would be another enemy of the US.

      Reply
    • Dom, do you really think it’s hypocritical to say a targeted military strike into Pakistan to kill Osama Bin Laden (which is what Obama said he’d be prepared to do in the ’04 debates and exactly what he ultimately actually did) is justified by the circumstance, while a full scale invasion of Iran is not?

      Reply
    • censored 04/10/12 #

      Nice bit of misrepresentation Dom!

      Let’s list the new wars started by Obama, with or without UN sanction.

      Reply
    • Peter Nolan, targeted strike against Bin Laden was not what Obama was talking about during the last campaign. Firstly he did not know the whereabouts of Bin Laden at the time and secondly he was talking about bombing and those of us who know, know Bin Laden was taken out by an action os a SEAL team. He was talking about bombing Pakistan and you leftist wussies said nothing but now the mention of bombing Iran by Romney makes you want to put nappies on. What’s the deal? Good auld lefties balance or what?

      Reply
  • I think a president Mitt Romney would be bad for planet Earth in general

    Reply
  • Obama has got a fight on now.
    Romney was strong on detail.
    He is a different animal to Bush.
    To defeat Democrats in Mass was a major achievement.
    Barack beware!

    Reply
  • Goes to show how stupid the Americans are put a red neck up for office & they”ll vote for him. Romney will be as bad if not worse than dubya.

    Reply
    • A Michigan-born, privileged former Governor of Massachusetts and Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School graduate is a “redneck”? Troll harder, Obama was timid, tired, distracted and deservedly lost.

      Reply
    • Don’t care where he was educated. He holds very “redneck” views on some issues.

      Reply
    • At least if Romney gets in the USA will stop withholding food aid money that countries need like they do now unless that country accepts all the LGBT rights they can throw at them along with “reproductive rights” aka abortion. I’d vote for a red neck like that any day.

      Reply
    • Ah face up to it bpd. Equal rights are coming, the church are nearly finished and your bigoted way of thinking is starting to die out in this country. Bye bye buddy. Close the door on your way out.

      Reply
    • Obama did loose sadly. He can be assertive and get his points across without being agressive as Romney was last night. A closed mind like Romney cannot be the President of America. America is supposedly looked upon by many countries in the world as been a great place, a place of equal rights, that every human has the right to decide on what they think and feel is best for them.

      The Americans that are actually going to use their vote cannot vote for such a closed mind as Romney. That is telling parents that their children that they loved for many years, that educated them, nurtured them, that showed them life and how to live…… to disown, hate their life and blood because a so called christian has verbly beaten it into them that their child is bad, dirty and of the devil. I hope, if there is a day that one of Romney’s sons or daughters (if he has any) comes out and tells him that his son is gay, that he does not disown him.

      Reply
    • Yes because not wanting unborn children murdered and defending marriage which forms the basic building block of society smack of closed mindedness.

      Reply
    • @ Monaghan Richie: There is a difference between asking Americans who they thought performed better in the debate or which candidate they are going to vote for.

      @ Sheila: Romney is a Mormon, not a Christian.

      Reply
    • Mormons consider themselves to be Christians.

      Reply
    • @Ryan Mormonism is a sect of Christianity.

      Reply
    • Yes Monaghan, it’s that or the American viewing public awarded the debate on the evidence of a compelling victory by the challenger.

      Reply
    • You sire, clearly have no idea what a “redneck” is…

      Reply
  • Its the impending shamrockery from Paul Ryan to try get the Paddy vote that has me most concerned. Wharr’s me toothpick??

    Reply
  • Romney performed well last night, though people’s low expectations of him certainly helped.
    Obama has clearly been taking too much notice of the polls, showing him out in front, and hence lacked the fire and aggression needed to do well in debate.
    Still suspect it is too little, too late but this does give Romney a chance to put his, til now, faltering campaign back on track.

    Reply
  • Please don’t let Romney get elected :(

    Reply
  • In fairness, the republicans have been accusing Obama of being overly attack-minded in his campaign ads (Fox News even think he’s being nasty… God help us) I think that while Romney have won the debate as a debate/competition, it won’t make a difference because he still came across as less likable (he’s quite horrible in fact.) If you read the transcript, what Obama actually said in the debate had a lot more substance than Romney.

    Obama didn’t seem nearly at his best, but I bet his popularity will increase in the opinion polls.

    Reply
  • Obama lost because there was no teleprompter.
    Romney won because he presented facts after fact.
    It’s that simple….

    Reply
  • You’re paying close to two Euro because your greedy government is taking 75% of whatever you pay at the pump. And the stupid people blame everyone else for this nonsense. I pay €8 to fill the tank of my 5.3 litter beast.

    Reply
  • We got a first hand view of a surly, amateur President. He had to fend for himself without the left media sheltering him. A dismal failure.

    Reply
  • Wow, an Irish media found strength not to put pro-Obama spin on an event that goes in Romney’s favor. Amazing.

    Reply
  • For the first time in four years and no hail to the chief, before he entered the room, 90 minutes of standing next to a loser..all a bit too annoying for President iconic Obama.

    And then he wished his Sweetie happy anniversary live on telly ?

    There was no plan B.

    Reply
  • A lot of very interesting comments here. Personally I’m baffled. Obama is a seasoned pro when it comes to debating. Romney made a balls of so many of his debates in the Republician nomination race. Plus McCain was a far more credible/capable opponent…it makes very little sense. If this ‘throw the first one’ genuinely is a stratedgy then it’s a very risky one. And yes, as foreign policy goes, Romney as President is a frightening prospect (Sarah Palin would nearly better). If Obama genuinely lost this, he needs to watch the tape of Bill Clinton whooping some major ass at the Democratic Convention a few weeks ago. Although, did Bill’s tour-de-force at the convention, which preceded Obama’s speech and, ino, kinda made his speech seem lack lustre in contrast, steal Barack’s debating mojo? It happens…

    Reply
  • The word redneck in the us and red legs in the carribean dates back to a slur upper class whites use to use toward the white underclass slaves/ servants.the word redneck today is still associated with many of the us white poor even if there democrats. Im no rom guy, but i find it quite amusing that obama supporters on here are so quick to defend any slur based on certain issues, yet when it comes to redneck they dish it out anytime someone disagrees with there views.getting back to the point though romney could not be any further away from been a red neck, he is not poor ,he is not a dcendent of white slaverey, genrations of his family have been born into privlige, much like d lads n lassies on this calling him a red neck. Pull yas ar pc pants up cause your own predujices are strarting to show folks.

    Reply
  • Obama won that debate by being a gentleman and letting Romney be Romney. It looks like he began the whole debate by cheating. He took some cheats notes from his pocket and put them on the podium and then went back and collected them at the end. That and he lied throughout. And lets not forget he wants to cut Sesame Street, big mistake. Look at 2:15.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEBwp2IAdMA&feature=player_embedded

    Reply
  • No more years!…. No more years!

    Reply
  • Romney is plain evil but Obama isn’t far off. He’s bombed more countries than Dubya. 6 in total – Libya, Iraq, Somalia, Afghanistan, Yemen and Pakistan.

    Nobel Peace Prize, my arse.

    Reply
  • Romney won, unfortunately. I thought Obama was rattled from the moment he opened his mouth. His announcement of his wedding anniversary sounded insincere to me. Did he have a fight with Michelle prior to the debate or is there something going on in the background? He’s usually so laid back and a good speaker. Just didn’t appear to be himself.

    I wonder why Romney wants the extra money for military spending, does he have a plan for its use?

    All makes for an interesting run in to polling day.

    Reply
  • Resel 04/10/12 #

    Why does our media give so much attention to this? Are there that many who care?

    Reply

Add New Comment