TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

Public service sick leave halved for most employees

The amount of paid sick leave is to be reduced from six months to three months.

THE MINISTER FOR Public Expenditure and Reform Brendan Howlin has welcomed a proposal by the Labour Court to halve the amount of paid sick leave granted to public service workers.

For almost 300,000 employees the present arrangement of six months sick leave on full pay, followed by six months on half pay within a four year period will be replaced by three months on full pay and three months on half pay from 2014.

A critical illness provision is also recommended under the new arrangements, which will see critical illness cover provided at six months on full pay and six months on half pay.

Howlin said that the current costs of sick leave stand at over €500 million annually, and said that the reforms will mean increased productivity, reductions in absenteeism and a reduction in costs.

Other changes include a maximum of seven self-certified paid sick leave days which will now apply over a two year period, rather than a one year period. The Labour Court has recommended that the changes to self-certified sick leave should come into effect as soon as possible.

The current arrangement also allows for a pension rate of pay to apply. This is to be replaced by a temporary rehabilitation payment which will be paid only for a period of eighteen months and only on the basis of a reasonable prospect of the employee returning to work.

The move has also been welcomed by Chambers Ireland, with Chief Executive Ian Talbot calling it a “positive announcement that will lead to enhanced productivity and cost savings across the wider public service”.

€26million: The annual bill for sick leave in the civil service>

Workers who get sick on holidays ‘are entitled to another holiday’>

Read next:

Comments (108 Comments)

  • Just to set the record straight on the public sector sick pay debate. As a Firefighter/Paramedic I do not and never have received full pay for uncertified OR certified sick leave. If I am absent from work I do get the basic daily rate which is about minimum pay. Try working 15, sometimes 16 hour nights with people that are carrying a multitude of airborne illnesses and diseases and see how hard it is to remain 100% fit and healthy all year around. Quite often we have to come into work with an illness in order to receive full pay often to the displeasure of colleagues who then run the risk of picking up that illness. We just can’t afford to be sick.
    Once again the media lump all the public sector into the one category and everyone else is misinformed as a result. I’m tired of this lazy journalism.

    Reply
    • Donal my respect to you i was in the service aswell.Sadly its a small cohort that get everyone tarred with the one brush.I saw it and still do where i work now.There is wasters in both the private and public sector happy for others to carry them.I has been my experience that generous sick pay schemes tend to make certain people sick.Again you have my respect stay safe.

      Reply
  • and in other news……….Today the Dáil voted on taking 60 days holidays (8 weeks and 4 days). The motion proposed that the next sitting day is not until September the 18th.

    Not one TD objected.

    Reply
  • I’m totally ok with this. I’m a teacher, haven’t taken one uncertified sick day in 8 years and never would. I’ve always worked as hard as I can for the kids I teach, much of it unpaid coaching etc outside of hours. Don’t miss my point – Some people take the piss in the public service and make all of us look bad, just like some people take the piss in the private sector too…Bank Executives and Developers are two that spring to mind…

    Reply
  • As a public servant I welcome these changes. The vast majority of hard working & loyal p.s.w are fed up and embarrassed by the lazy, selfish few who abused the 6 months sick rule as an automatic entitlement. Their work has to be taken on by already over-burdened colleagues. I hope “post-pregnancy problems” are included in this change. I’m astonished by the debilitating illnesses many of my female colleagues in the PS suffer after having a baby. The majority can’t return to work for over a year after child-birth, while still receiving a full-wage. I think GP’s signing Certs have a lot to answer for.

    Reply
    • @Davy Soup, Fellow civil servant here, and couldn’t agree more with you. The vast minority of lazy, useless, dead weight types give the rest of us a bad name.

      Reply
    • Davy Soup, agree 100%. I’m a public servant and am over the moon with this. Twice I have seen the lazy & selfish you speek off being put under pressure to perform and pull their own weight. They went out sick, suffering from stress!! & the union backed them up and while their out the rest of us have to do their work and when they come back the minute something is said to them about doing their job their gone again. So frustrating to the majority of us.

      Reply
    • Where are @Daisy Chainsaw and @Too Trueleft now. I worked in the Public Service for a number of years and can vouch for the fact that the majority of public servants are as hard working and diligent as the private sector counterparts. It is the selfish incompetent lazy minority that ruin it for everyone else. And unfortunately this minority are backed up by the unions. My decision to leave the public service was primarily down to the influence that unions had on day to day work practices within the service. I had come from the private sector and was used to working in a flexible environment where change was actively encouraged. In my experience the unions are responsible for most of what is wrong with the public service. I am sure they will try to block this change to sick leave entitlements.

      Reply
    • They’re actually backing the changes Paul, if the reports today are anything to go by.

      Reply
    • Well said all of you!

      Reply
    • I am also a public servant and am very pleased with this outcome. The vast majority of us public servants don’t abuse the sick leave system and are tired of picking up the workload for those few that do abuse the system. I also feel that given the current economic climate this is one unnesseciary expense we just cannot afford.

      Reply
  • There is a small number of people who are abusing the system and this needs to stop.

    Reply
  • so what happens when the guard, fireman or nurse is injured in work? id be an advocate of drawing a major distinction between the public service in general and the front line services, i simply think it is wrong to tar the people whose vocation is to protect the rest of us with the big public service brush.

    Reply
    • What a ridiculous generalisation. Just because someone in the public sector isn’t front line staff, that doesn’t mean that most don’t work hard to serve the public well. There are some bad eggs on the frontline too.

      Reply
    • @ Ruairi — So you reckon the clerk in Dept. of Agriculture or Fisheries runs the same risks to their personal health as the Fireman who has a burning building collapse on him or the Guard who has his patrol car rammed by a stolen car!?!? Don’t think paper-cuts are that severe!!

      Reply
    • Not what I said at all, or what OpenMinded said either. Maybe you should read both points again and come back.

      Reply
    • I’m slating the notion that not all Public Service workers should be considered the same!! For the record, I’m self-employed, but there should be two tier public sector distinguishing frontline emergency services from other public sector workers!! I don’t need a file clerk at 4am in the morning when my house is on fire or there’s some Junkie burglar at the foot of my bed demanding my car keys!!!

      Reply
    • And I am not arguing with you. I merely suggested that there are good, hard working people in the administration side of the public sector too, and that it shouldn’t be overlooked. Also, that it shouldn’t be generalised that the the rest of the public sector do not have an important role to play in serving the public.

      Reply
    • @Ruairí … I think OpenMinded is referring to on-the-job injuries (which may require sick leave) being more likely to occur to front-line staff than to staff working in administration. Surely those with a more physically hazardous job should be entitled to more paid time off if needed?

      Reply
  • Tommy C 19/07/12 #

    As a PS worker i have absolutely no issue with this and I dont think anyone will.
    I work with 2 of the laziest f*ckers you have ever met. Constant smoke breaks and sick leave. Ringing in the morning to tell us they are talking annual leave that day (we are meant to ok this in advance) and going home early (up to 2 hours) and nothing has been done about it no matter how many times the rest of us have complained.
    We even wrote to James Reilly whose secretary replied and told us our email had been forwarded to the Secretary Manager of the hospital I work in, drawing attention to the rest of us and putting us at risk! needless to say, nothing has been done.
    In saying all that, I have been unwell for the past 4 months and finally went to the doc Monday with bronchitis and was ordered to take the week off. I told my doc Id take 2 only as if Im out, certain work wont be done.
    I havent been sick in 5 years.

    Reply
    • I actually have no problem with this as long as the critical illness issue is dealt with sensibly- the last thing a humane society wants is for someone with cancer or who needs something major like a joint replacement to defer it because of fears for their job and income- or to go back to work before they are fit to do so. There will always be the ones who milk the system, and this reduction is a good way to ensure this is less likely to happen, as long as the serious illness issue is properly dealt with- it is hard to fake cancer, heart attack or joint replacement etc .

      Reply
    • Tommy C 19/07/12 #

      I pay into a salary protection scheme but touch wood, I will never need it.

      Reply
    • Tommy C 19/07/12 #

      Im sick of the smokers i work with getting smoke breaks every hour and then taking 5 days a month sick leave for chest infections!

      Reply
  • peter 19/07/12 #

    Another moral victory for all the people that wouldn’t lower themselves to be a public servant in the boom time. A country of begrudgers. We didn’t break the country the banks and big private sector business. Next time some of you need a guard or a fireman bear your comments in mind. Typical Irish if i can’t have them no one can.

    Reply
  • Recently published figures for sick pay in the private sector runs suggest that it runs at €1.5 billion. Any comments from the anti-public service gallery?

    Reply
    • Not a member of this anti ps you speak of.But just an observation,who or what pays for the public sector.If you want to throw out figures as a whole the Public sector in total nearly twice as many sick days as the private sector.If you feel i’m wrong just google it.But as in the public sector if someone is missing everyone else picks up the slack.At least where i work.

      Reply
    • As an employer (small business), I could well believe it. I once had a guy tell me that he proposed to add his sick days to his holidays so that he could be away for longer! Was none too happy when I refused. More recently, an employee left to emigrate and asked me to pay her for her untaken sick leave!! It’s far to easy to get up on our high horses and give out about the public service. Like it or not, the private sector has, proportionally, just as many bad apples.

      Reply
    • @Norman: I think it’s reasonably fair to say that the costs incurred by private sector employers for their employees’ sick leave is often passed on to the consumer in some shape or form.

      Reply
    • But at least in the private sector you can let the useless ones go.

      Reply
  • Sick leave being cut is fine as long as the health service works properly. “If” it doesn’t then people can be waiting months for treatment / tests and suddenly their sick leave is over. This is not right. Just because one set of workers has poor rights, does not mean that all workers should want everyone to be treated badly. We should all be joining together to make things better for workers, not arguing with each other. These cuts will cost money, as already stated – if a worker has to go to a Dr and pay €60 plus for a cert then they will take the full week off to make sure they are better before they return to work, instead of dragging themselves in after one day as currently happens. Now that this Govt has cut sick leave, it had better step up and get the health service working. It had also better sort out replacements for people who are out sick. P.S. What madness thinking it’s ok for nurses to go to work sick!

    Reply
  • here comes more ps bashing

    Reply
  • the pitting of private against public sector in harsh economic times rather reminds me of nazi induced german hysteria against jews in harsh economic times..

    Reply
  • I’m on a temporary contract, I don’t get sick days. Don’t take them. In fairness, unless you are really sick why would you. If you can logon to facebook or check your mail at home you should really be in work

    Reply
  • In before the usual bashing…

    Cutting the uncertified sickies won’t decrease the bill, It’ll probably have the opposite effect. You’ll suffer through a cold, taking a sick day to sleep through the worst of it and get some rest to get you through the rest of the week, but if that option is taken away, then you’ll just go to the doctor for a cert for a few days to recover properly, costing much more in sick pay and productivity.

    Reply
  • @tonyngent. How do you then account for the fact that private sector sick pay is running at €1.5 billion according to the CSO. I feel that you really have no proof and that your comment is more dinner party codswallop.

    Reply
  • Still way too generous. Should of attacked these sick day laws with a machete and a chainsaw.

    Reply
  • In my opinion genuine sick leave is NOT absenteeism.I think it is a SCANDAL to call a sick worker absent through his -her-own fault.How on Earth can people with an injury,dying with the Flu,or crucified with back pain be expected to work?????I will say it again we are only human beings.This is a return to slave labour and Victorian values.

    Reply
  • I’m a PS worker and welcome this. In five years working I’ve taken 0 uncertified sick days and one certified day the doctor made news take.

    There is huge abuse of the system and its 100% true that many see sick pay as extra holidays or hangover days. It’s never been tackled because many of these abusers are at the top. You can’t tar all PS workers with the same brush so I’m delighted steps are being taken and I hope more are to come.

    Reply
  • If I have back trouble I will NOT be able to work.Simple as that.And paying doctor fees is something I can ill afford.

    Reply
    • Are you saying no-one in the private sector abuses the current sick-pay system? That it doesn’t need reform? Even the unions wouldn’t agree with you there. In many private companies of you don’t show up for work you don’t get paid because companies can’t afford to pay. The state is now in the same position I.e. broke. Not saying all public sector workers abuse the system but many do, the present system is a farce and needs major reform, today’s doesn’t go far enough.

      Reply
  • Don’ t touch our sick pay we are humans not machinery.

    Reply
  • It amazes me that people use these things to immediately jump on the public service. Doing so simply plays into the hands of those who would seek to separate public service from private service.

    The truth here is fair enough to point out: public sector workers take more sick days than private sector workers. There doesn’t seem to be a question here.

    So why not bring public and private sector closer together in how absenteeism (and other employment conditions) are dealt with? Why not take best practice from private sector and apply it to public sector?

    There are areas where this does not mean a direct translation – certain professions attract injuries – the cause of these injuries needs to be addressed also and not just a private/public like-for-like application of sick pay rules.

    It’s worth pointing out that there are many people in jobs (or are self employed) who are not in a sick pay scheme in private industry – pointing this out is not an argument against the public sector. I think it highly unfair that this be the case.

    Reply
  • So what happens when someone goes over the 3 month paid period? Do they get the social welfare Certs stamped by the Doctor? Or do they go without?

    Reply
    • Put a private Income protection plan in place and you’re income would be protected Dec. I’m sure that a union backed group scheme could be put together if there is a significant reduction in illness pay for Public Servants after the proposed timeframes. A large group scheme for public servants would be pretty cheap as well.

      Reply
    • So what happens when someone in the private sector goes over their, eh ZERO days of paid sick leave and has a chronic illness? That’s what social welfare illness benefit etc. is for. 3 months paid sick leave is MORE than generous.

      Reply
    • Kat,

      I would not like to to have survive on Social Welfare Benefit if I were to suffer a major illness that left me out of work for 3mnts+. The last thing anybody needs at a time like that is to be worried about their finances.

      While I do agree with you that 3 months of full pay & 3 motnhs half pay is a gilt edged package, I think it’s only fair to acknowledge that those in the public service were offered this as part of their package initially and halving the benefit is a very significant reduction in their terms.

      Reply
  • I work in the Council and we get 9 weeks certified sick pay and 7 days uncertified, not the more generous sick scheme that applies to other sectors of the Public Service.. We used to have 12 weeks certified but to get the 7 days uncertified we had to give up 3 weeks of certified sick,,bringing us down to the present 9. I dont suppose we’ll get those back now ,will we?

    Reply
  • The sick leave should be available for ALL WORKERS!
    Have we become a nation of dumb neocon teapartiers? That we scramble over the corpses of those who fought for decent working conditions for us? Do you want to work to live or live to work? Rights of workers are declining at a shocking rate.If you guys celebrate this, Watch out, its holiday pay they’ll be cutting nex, and then wages and all for the profits of the bankers ,£13 trillion in off shore accounts.

    Reply
  • it would be nice to see more accountability in all employment, when you work with people who are not qualified and do terrible jobs they always seem to get away with whatever they want, I’m a public servant but I’ve worked in lots of places. my job is pretty tough and I wouldn’t do it for peanuts

    Reply
  • About time too, the country is broke and can no longer afford to subsidise public service hangover days. Welcome to the real world.

    Reply
  • Do away with the Public Service altogether we don’t need any of them, computerise everything.

    Reply
  • Should have been cut to one tenth, half is still way too high….And they get to keep current sickpay until 2014….FFS…!!!

    Reply
    • One tenth of 7 days uncertified sick leave is .7 days i.e. necessitating a trip to the doctors for every single instance of single day absence which in all likelihood will result in the doctor certifying a longer absence.

      Good man, didn’t really think that through, did ya?

      Reply
  • mel 19/07/12 #

    About time it’s tackled,next ,pay and there subsidised pensions

    Reply
  • Illness means something’s not working quite right,
    So do what it takes to get mended.
    When you are sick, it gives me quite a fright,
    So please, let your illness be ended!

    Reply
  • Other than those who routinely work with with immune compromised patients….why are public servants being paid for NOT working?

    Reply
  • This is OT but I have a question. I have a relative who works in a hospital in Dublin and says something negative about the Filipino nurses that work there every day. I don’t know if it is fare or just pure racism and xenophobia. I want to know if anyone has heard about this. Apparently the Filipino nurses can get a full pension after working for ten years and can leave with that pension. I don’t believe it and I want to have proof to give to that person that it is not true. I’m just sick of all the Filipino nurse bashing.

    Reply

Add New Comment