Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

FACTCHECK

Debunked: Article saying Sinn Féin should apologise for the 1916 Rising was doctored

A fake article by “W Brittan” called the Easter Rising an “unprovoked attack”.

A SCREENSHOT APPEARING to show a news article calling the 1916 Rising an “unprovoked attack” and suggesting Sinn Féin should apologise to Britain is fake.

The doctored image appears to show a 16 October article on The Irish Times website titled: “Should Sinn Fein win the next election, their first act must be a formal apology to Britain for the Easter Rising”.

Its summary reads: “If David Cameron can apologise for The Famine, then the party can show it has moved beyond its childish obsession with so-called ‘British imperialism’”.

The byline is attributed to “W Brittan”.

The image also shows a caption for a photo that says “118 British soldiers lost their lives in the unprovoked attack”.

Doctored

A tweet featuring the image received more than 3,500 likes and was retweeted hundreds of times, with many expressing outrage at what they appear to have believed to be a real article.

Some other commenters appear to have been aware that it was probably not a genuine screenshot, but argued that it was similar to some headlines published by the Irish Times that could be perceived as pro-British, such as an opinion piece declaring: “It is time to rein in the Anglophobia“.

There is no trace of the article seen in the screenshot on the Irish Times website, nor are there internet archives or Google caches of the article.

There’s also no record of the supposed Irish Times author named in the byline, nor are there reactions on Twitter to such an article being tweeted out by The Irish Times or its journalists.

The screenshot also differs from the Irish Times style in that it omits the fada over Sinn Féin.

The Twitter image also includes alt-text, a description which is usually hidden, but appears when a picture fails to load and can be rendered into artificial speech for internet users who can’t readily see the image.

This hidden description reads, in part: “There headline is curiously missing the accent over the e in Fein, and that’s definitely not because I forgot that was the Irish Times house style and is in fact a petty slight against the party by a subeditor.” [sic]

The Irish Times did not give an official response to The Journal’s inquiries, however, some section editors did mention it on their social media accounts.

Damian Cullen, the Health & Family Editor of the Irish Times said on Twitter said the screenshot was “not real” though described the fake as a decent effort. “W(est) Brittan is a nice touch,” he wrote.

The image seen in the screenshot had been used by the Irish Times before and it is likely that the creator of the image just edited the text in the article on their computer to make the screenshot.

It is easy to fake text on internet browsers, including text on newspapers and official websites.

These regularly get spread on the internet and, although often created as jokes, they can be taken seriously when spread out of context.

The screenshot of an Irish Times article arguing that Sinn Féin should apologise to Britain for the 1916 Rising is fake. No such article was published by The Irish Times. 

The Journal’s FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network’s Code of Principles. You can read it here. For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader’s Guide here. You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks here.