Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File photo of Gemma O'Doherty Sam Boal/RollingNews.ie
Courts

Court makes orders preventing Gemma O'Doherty from harassing mother of teen who died by suicide

The mother of the teenage boy is suing O’Doherty over her alleged use of his photo without consent.

THE MOTHER OF a teenager who died by suicide has secured High Court orders restraining Gemma O’Doherty from harassing her.

The orders were granted this evening by Mr Justice Conor Dignam in favour of Edel Campbell, who claims she has been the subject of a campaign of harassment by O’Doherty for suing her

Campbell took a case against O’Doherty for allegedly wrongly and unlawfully using the image of plaintiff’s son Diego Gilsenan in an article linking unexplained deaths to the Covid-19 vaccination.

Mr Justice Dignam made orders including ones restraining O’Doherty from harassing the plaintiff, or from publishing Campbell’s or her late son’s images or any personal confidential material about them.

O’Doherty is also restrained from encouraging or inciting others to intimidate the plaintiff.

The court also made orders requiring O’Doherty to take down and remove any image of the plaintiff and her late son from any form of media that she owns or operates.

The orders are to remain in place pending the final outcome of Campbell’s action against O’Doherty, trading as The Irish Light.

The judge that while he was not making any final determination of the claim, he was satisfied to grant the injunction because Campbell had made a strong case that the defendant’s actions towards her “amount to harassment”.

The judge noted evidence put before the court where the defendant had made comments in online talks and videos about Campbell, including that she is “a bad mother” as well as allegedly untrue comments about her son, and the circumstances of his death.

The judge also noted that O’Doherty had made comments in her online lectures where she spoke about Campbell that were antisemitic and had engaged in Holocaust denial.

The judge said that the case raised a number of novel and complex legal issues, including arguments on the freedom of speech.

These were matters that can be argued at the full hearing of the action, he said.

The injunctions are to remain in place pending the full hearing of the claim.

O’Doherty was not present in court during the hearing, nor were any representations made on her behalf.

In emails to the plaintiff’s lawyers given to the court, O’Doherty denied the defendant’s allegations and rejected all claims that she has done anything wrong.

She said that she was not able to come to court as she is currently on holidays, and that she had only been given two day’s advance notice of the application.

In his ruling Mr Justice Dignam, acknowledged the contents of her emails. He said he was satisfied to proceed to hear and the determine the application in her absence as no objections had been made before the court to matter going ahead.

Last May, Campbell, represented by David Kennedy SC, with Paul Comiskey O’Keeffe BL, instructed by solicitor Ciaran Mulholland, launched a High Court action aimed at restraining O’Doherty, trading as The Irish Light, from using or publishing the image of Campbell’s late son for any purpose without the plaintiff’s consent.

The plaintiff claims that O’Doherty is a journalist and the publisher of The Irish Light, a free periodical newspaper, and the publisher/editor of the irishlightpaper.com website.

Following Diego’s death in August 2021 it is claimed that O’Doherty used her his image in an article which it is claimed wrongly stated that he died as a result of the administration of the Covid-19 vaccination.

Campbell, from Kingscourt, Co Cavan, claims that despite making several pleas to O’Doherty to cease using her son’s image, the defendant has allegedly refused to do so, and has denied that the use of the image is unethical.

Campbell claims that the unauthorised and repeated use of her son’s image amounts to a harassment and breach of her constitutional rights, and has caused her emotional pain, suffering and harm.

Seeking the injunctions, her counsel said that the defendants conduct towards Ms Campbell in social posts became “exponentially worse” after the action was launched.

She also claims that as a result of an alleged direct call for action by O’Doherty anonymous attack accounts have been set up on social media in an attempt to target Campbell.

Counsel said that a lot of the material posted by the defendant in online lectures and talks about his client, a grieving mother whose health has suffered as a result of the harassment. was “horrendous” and went “beyond the beyond” and outside the limits of what can been considered the right to freedom of speech.

Counsel said his client had asked O’Doherty to stop using the photo of her son, which it is claimed was taken from RIP.ie and used without consent, but the defendant had refused to do so.

Campbell had only come to court as “a last resort,” counsel added.

The action will return before the court at a later date.

Author
Aodhan O Faolain