Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Prince Andrew, The Duke of York, wearing a hat. Doug Peters/Doug Peters/EMPICS Entertainment
Identity crisis

Police asked Prince Andrew to identify himself as he walked in palace gardens

The Duke of York, the third child of Queen Elizabeth II, was approached by two armed officers as he took an evening stroll in Buckingham Palace during the week.

BRITAIN’S PRINCE ANDREW was challenged by jittery royal protection officers in the gardens of Buckingham Palace last week as they stepped up security following a break-in on Monday.

The Duke of York, the third child of Queen Elizabeth II, was approached by two armed officers as he took an evening stroll on Wednesday at the monarch’s official London residence, a spokesman for Scotland Yard said.

However, the spokesman denied a report in the Sunday Express newspaper that the officers had pointed guns at the 53-year-old duke and shouted at him to get down on the ground.

“On Wednesday, 4 September at approximately 1800 hours two uniformed officers approached a man in the gardens of Buckingham Palace to verify his identity,” the spokesman said.

“The man was satisfactorily identified. No weapons were drawn and no force was used.”

Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the incident.

The incident came two days after a man was arrested inside the palace in a major security breach. He had scaled a fence to get into the building in central London.

© AFP, 2013

More: Two arrested after man ‘climbs fence’ at Buckingham Palace

Your Voice
Readers Comments
43
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.