Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Graham Hughes/Photocall Ireland

Prison officer recovering from cancer awarded €80,000 in employment tribunal case

The Equality Tribunal has found that the Prison Service did not have “fair and transparent” selection processes in place.

A PRISON OFFICER who had fought cancer was awarded €80,000 after being denied the chance to interview for a promotion.

The Irish Prison Service was directed by the Equality Tribunal to pay the man €33,000 for what it deemed “discriminatory treatment” and a further €47,000 for what it called “victimisation”.

The man, who had been a prison officer since 1998, had applied  for the position on Assistant Chief Officer in an unnamed prison in June 2010. However, the complainant was told in August that his application was unsuccessful.

The man had been stationed in the medical unit at the prison after returning from sick leave. He had been receiving treatment on a malignant melanoma and had asked to be put in a unit that did not require climbing stairs.

He said that a Deputy Governor had expressed surprise that he had applied to work with the ‘dinosaurs’ in the medical unit, adding that the complainant was ‘no spring chicken’.

He claimed that he was made forfeit three hours of leave after phoning in sick following a cancer treatment.

The complainant claimed that the decision to exclude him from that panel and subsequent roles was made because of his medical condition and his age.

The Equality Tribunal found that the Prison Service had discriminated against the man on the grounds of his age and disability. They found that he had also been victimised by his employers.

The tribunal also found that the Prison Services’ selection process for the acting up panel was “clearly deficient and did not comply with equality legislation” and ordered that a “transparent, fair selection process” in future.

Read: HSE West ordered to pay €70,000 to woman it discriminated against

Read: Young employee dubbed ‘Virgin Mary’ by supervisors wins sexual harassment case

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Paul Hosford
View 38 comments
Close
38 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds