TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 19 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Boston College IRA interviews must be given to PSNI by next month

A court in Boston has ruled that transcripts of an interview with a convicted IRA bomber must be handed over to the Police Service of Northern Ireland.

File photo
File photo
Image: PA

A COURT IN Boston has ruled that interviews conducted with a convicted IRA bomber must be handed over to the police in Northern Ireland investigating the disappearance of Jean McConville in 1972.

BBC News reports that interviews given by the former IRA bomber Dolours Price to the former IRA member Anthony McIntyre and the journalist Ed Moloney as part of the Boston College Belfast Project must be handed to the PSNI by next month.

The decision of the first circuit of appeal in the US could damage the peace process in Northern Ireland according to those who argued against the disclosure of the interviews.

Investigators want the transcripts of the interviews, which took place between 2001 and 2006, to be handed over amid allegations that Price claimed in a separate interview to have been the person who drove mother-of-ten McConville to her death in 1972.

McConville is one of the Disappeared who were people that were abducted, murdered and secretly buried by the IRA.

Her remains lay undiscovered for over 30 years until walkers on Shelling Hill beach in Dundalk came across them by chance in 2003.

Those involved in the Belfast Project and Boston College appealed the decision and argued that releasing the tapes could potentially endanger the peace process in the North.

The oral history project involved academics, journalists and historians conducting interviews with former republicans and loyalists about their activities during The Troubles including Price who participated in the car bombing of a London court in 1973 which injured over 200 people.

Moloney and McIntyre had no right to stop the release of the tapes, the court ruled on Friday.

UTV news reports that Boston College is still attempting to quash a broader court order for other materials and interviews undertaken as part of the project to be released.

Several US politicians including the former presidential candidate John Kerry have lobbied the US State Department of behalf of Boston College seeking to keep the interviews sealed, the Guardian reports.

Wife of IRA interviewer: ‘Releasing Boston tapes will endanger my family’

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (58 Comments)

  • Just curious, but what was the academic purpose of the interviews? What is suspected of being in the transcripts that is not now in the public domain as a result of the project?

    Reply
    • It’s to document the era. It will be very important in future years. Just had a look over my old secondary school history book, it’s such nostalgic romantic crap. More than 90 percent of the students didn’t even know there was a civil right problem in the north. How history is recorded an rewritten is very important and the rights of both journalist and subject should have been respected!

      Reply
  • The sub heading in this story refers to the disappearance of Jean McConville. It is my understanding that this lady was murdered and didn’t just disappear. Her family and Society are quite entitled to have an inquiry into the matter as others were with respect to the murders on Bloody Sunday. Anything else is hypocrisy of the highest order whether it touches high level politicians or not.

    Reply
  • Bruce 08/07/12 #

    And why not?
    Next two years are pivotal for irish politics. Sinn fein will have to make radical decisions. Some or all of the current leadership will have to go. No one with blood on their hands will be accepted by the next generation of voters.
    Bring it on!

    Reply
    • I suppose Michael Collins had “blood on his hands” too? Amazing how some Irish want to return to a colony of Britain again… Sinn Fein are the second most popular political party in Ireland. The “next generation of voters” are not concerned about Sinn Fein’s past either.

      Reply
    • Dont even try to compare michael collins to provisional IRA terrorists. Unlike collins, they were fighting for something that was impossible by democratic means. In 1919 and the following years, the vast majority in the south wanted independence. Just because someone believes in democracy and a peoples right to self determination does not mean they want to return to colonialism, the fact is that a majority in NI want to be part of britain and if you believe in democracy, majority rules. Michael collins was one of our greatest statesmen ever, the provisional IRA were terrorists who destroyed the lives of thosands of innocent people. You cannot compare the two so dont even try.

      Reply
    • Rob 08/07/12 #

      “the fact is that a majority in NI want to be part of britain”

      Wow. Where do these intellects come from? Nothing to do with the fact this “majority” are unionist planters who happen to be given annexed land.

      Stephen Corrigan – suppose you owned a home in Kiltimagh and someone decided to squat in your property. Then you attempted to re-claim it and got met with resistance. It is nothing more than the theft of your property.

      Reply
  • Shinners keep claiming they want a truth commission, therefore they should be delighted at the release of these tapes, especially as it will shine a light of truth on the murky past of some of their senior members.

    Reply
    • It has nothing to do with Sinn Fein, dimwit. Why isn’t there a criminal investigation into the loyalist terrorism of innocent Catholics? Why are you so silent on that? How doy ou justify the British Govt’s collusion in loyalist terrorism?

      Looks like you are allowing yourself to be indoctrinated by Murdochs empire – ‘made in britain’

      Reply
    • It’s everything to do with SF, as it’s been widely leaked one of their senior members, who says he was never in the IRA, is proved otherwise by the contents of these tapes.

      Reply
    • Kearon,

      The IRA were defending our country just like Michael Collins. Nobody cares if anyone was in the IRA, only you do because your clients are probably mostly British. As someone else pointed, if you want to become a british citizen, you know where the Airport is….MOVE.

      Reply
    • Rob 08/07/12 #

      Stephen Kearon is a former QUANGO adviser to this Government. Check out his profile.

      No wonder we have so much waste, overpayment, underperformance and low-achievers in the civil service.

      Don’t annoy the monkey, he starts to fling his feces after a while.

      Reply
    • @Mark Provos were just a bunch of criminal thugs, thankfully long since defeated.

      The fact that so many Shinnerbots are on active keyboard duty reflects the fear of the organisation at the truth contained in these tapes

      Reply
    • To be fair the Provo’s had a mandate similar to that of the War of Independence IRA, although on a much smaller scale. It would not be wrong to compare the two.

      Reply
  • Many above are arguing that the release of these tapes will hinder our “moving on” as a people.
    Couldn’t disagree more. There are families that, quite understandably surely, cannot simply “move on” with out closure. This closure can only be achieved by examining what precisely happened their loved ones.

    Indeed, if we can’t look at our history, in all its grotesque detail, one must really question to what degree we really have moved on… I’d like to believe we’re now mature enough as a nation to examine these things objectively.

    Reply
    • A very valid point. My problem was with the archive, and the fact they breached the interviewer-interviewee agreement to get at the information. I have some experience gathering interviews for a large work, so I can sympathise with Boston Colleges frustration at the whole affair. It will be scrutinised by people with a criminal agenda, who are seeking prosecutions, even though that will be practically impossible to achieve, and then the records will be lost to the public. The British have many files on Sinn Fein already, so most of this will not be new to them. I agree that their is a need for justice, but I’m not sure this archives movement into British custody brings that any closer. Most of these interviews are circumspect and unusable in a criminal court case. On a human level, I can relate to the McConville’s search though. What sane person could not? I suppose I am in two minds about it all, if I am honest. The archive would have produced more answers if it had been left in situ, where it could have been examined and used to produce other works, many of which would have shed more light on what really happened in Northern Ireland. Now it will simply be classified, and the possibility of getting the illusive answers will be lost forever.

      Reply
  • The IRA were never defending this country Mark Dalt. That is a sick and warped distortion of their destructive campaign of murder and genocide. I am content to mostly look forward now but when evidence is available to the Authorities of vile murder then it MUST come to light. We do need to know who is among us and whether their truth Is our truth.

    Reply
    • I wonder if these tapes will contain any information relating to the Dublin/Monaghan bombings which would prove collusion between MI5, RUC and loyalist paramilitaries.

      Reply
    • Rob 09/07/12 #

      Mark. H

      Quite the contrary. They are much better men than you

      Considering how many time you are calling yourself a “better man”, I’d say you must know it too.
      Sounds like desperate self-justification if I’ve ever heard it

      Reply
  • Rob 08/07/12 #

    I praise Boston College for still trying to quash a broader order for other materials from its project. One should not trust the British Government with these tapes. Enough blood has been spilt throughout the past 40 years.

    Reply
  • Mark Dalt. Why are you having to resort to personal abuse to try to get your point across? I was always taught to believe that people calling others dimwit and utilising personal attacks on people probably don’t have a particularly strong point to make in the first place. Are you finding it difficult to make your argument without resorting to personal abuse? Why do you think that might be?

    Reply
    • mcbab 08/07/12 #

      Patrick. Mark has resorted to personal abuse,as has fagan, to divert attention from the fact that they have no intelligent point to make. Sad isn’t it?

      Reply
    • Diversionary tactic, as they can’t debate using facts so end up throwing verbal abuse around.

      Reply
    • Rob 09/07/12 #

      Good Stephen – now tell all leeches in your Quango department to do the same.

      One thing:

      The Irishman who earns his own way and is not a burden is a BETTER MAN than the public servant who tries to vote himself money at the expense of the Irishman.

      Remember that.

      Reply
  • Bad bad idea!!! Onwards and upwards I say!!! What value will this information have??? None… Lord rest the woman’s sole, but this isn’t going to bring her back. It will reignite hatred again up the north! In my opinion anyway!

    Reply
    • “Soul”, Julie. It won’t drag the North back. People don’t want that all over again. Certain people in the North are great for demanding justice from others but not from themselves. We’ll see how this pans out.

      Reply
    • Forced disappearance is a crime against humanity without a statute of limitations. Those involved in its direction should be before the international criminal courts.

      Reply
    • Julie,

      I agree. The US government dispespected academic protocol by giving the British government priority. The Irish government should have openly opposed the request. The US government used an agreement between britain and the US. However, this is Ireland.

      Reply
    • ” Those involved in its direction should be before the international criminal courts.”

      So may I conclude that by making this comment you agree that the “troubles” was actually a valid war, given that the ICC was set up to deal solely with genocide and crimes of war?

      Reply
  • This is going to cause a lot of difficulty for many people, both in Sinn Fein and the wider Northern Irish community. While I support the McConville’s desire for justice for their mother, I do not agree with these records being opened, prior to the death of the people involved, and against the expressed wishes of the interviewers and the college. It is a bad day for those engaged in academic analysis of the Troubles. It seems the UK authorities, which have ignored a sizeable amount of information implicating British soldiers in many acts of murder, are eager to settle old scores with members of the wider Irish republican community. The peace process may suffer because of it, which would be a sad move backward for the island, as a whole. I believe the issue of interviewer/interviewee privacy should have been upheld, given the nature of the archive involved, but, as I said, I can also sympathise with the McConville family on many levels. It is a terrible situation. Justice demands some retribution, but common sense expects us to move on and reconcile with the many atrocities committed during a long and bloody war. There may be dark days ahead, unfortunately.

    Reply
    • Oops I do believe the postings suggest a coalition of instructions from Headquarters to shut down this story as soon as possible and ridicule contributors who take the Courts view. Someone at a very senior level of the Republican leadership is worried.

      Reply
    • @Mark- I am not, and never have been, a member of Sinn Fein or the IRA, so my opinions on this story are my own, and are based on my own academic experiences. If you do not agree with my opinion that is fair enough, but trying to cast such dispersions on my character are not justified or acceptable.

      Reply
  • Not sure how this can help anyone or anything up North. We,as a people are moving forward. The British fought a dirty counter insurgency against a dirty foe. Wrongs were committed on both sides, how is dredging up old wounds going to help, much the same as trying to prosecute the soldiers involved in Bloody Sunday is only continuing to breathe life into the problems instead of focusing on the lessons learned and looking at resolving the political problems and outstanding current problems. Solutions and resolutions are the only way forward not the current one upmanship that exits. It’s not a schoolyard. Get on with, marching time is upon us again so no doubt the agitators are going to be getting plenty of press in the next few days. More of the North in the press for the wrong reasons.

    Reply
    • The issues arise due to the fact that statements about a vile murder that is still under investigation appear to be in the public domain and the State is unable to ignore such a reality. If the participants in these interviews had not wished for their contents to be known to the Authorities then they should never have given them. This was a particularly vile murder of a young mother who appeared to have been executed for human kindness shown to a wounded British soldier. She was a non combatant and was not killed by a stray bullet or a shrapnel ricochet but rather by a decision taken at a high level of the Republican movement. Her family are quite entitled to know the truth.

      Reply
    • Mark,

      Are you serious? You can’t be bothered to do a google search on that???

      The participants were informed their interviews would NOT be divulged until after their deaths. The US government then decided to pander like a lapdog to Britain. They need Britain if they want to invade Iran. America is broke after the Iraq invasion.

      Reply
    • Well said Mark

      Reply
    • As in Mark Hamilton

      Reply
    • Rob 09/07/12 #

      No man on public sector bloated pay is better than the man who earns his own way.

      Your first obligation in life is to not be an undue burden on others.

      Every person earning his own way is better than the leech – even you.

      Reply
  • Stephen is a PRO for FF. He has been a Govt. Special adviser for Dick Roche, his local party colleague. Made a director of a semi-state by FF, a peace commissioner by them and had the pleasure of trending on twitter, when a story broke about web hosting fee’s of 3250, which a journalist did for 25 euro’s.

    He couldn’t care less about what Loyalists did, they aren’t the ones that are going to hold FF back from power by taking votes and seats off them. It doesn’t benefit him one penny to complain about them.

    For FF’ers, everything is directed through the prism of self interest.

    http://storify.com/contact_ie/stephen-kearon-and-that-3250-bill-for-hosting-a-we

    Reply
  • mcbab 08/07/12 #

    Good decision.

    Reply
  • Julie 08/07/12 #

    Tom couldn’t agree more, it seems every other government trumps ours, US goverment okay this decision, English banks causing turmoil, not really sure of the point of our government anymore at all!!!

    Reply
  • Hopefully someone’s goes to jail as a result. Putting a bullet in a defenceless mothers head. How heroic … It’s not as if sinn fein would ever support animals like these

    Oh wait……..

    Reply
  • The Irish government should retaliate by increasing taxes on American companies here in Ireland. These are the very supporters of the US Govt’s vendetta against Ireland. Their offices should be examined for any irregularities by our officials. Shannon Airport should be immediately closed to the US Army.

    The US disregarded the Good Friday Agreement by allowing these files to be handed over.

    Reply
  • Bring it on.

    Reply
  • Rob 09/07/12 #

    Former Quangos have devoted themselves to blathering on here about Sinn Fein. It is indicative of further pay cuts to Quangos and their dinosaur pensions. Sinn Fein will gather lots of support for their pledge to trim these high earners and tax them heavily. Why should the Irish taxpayer subsidize an overpayed lifestyle of politically motivated Quangos? WHY???

    Reply
  • Ann you are a little obvious with your posting. Are you not shocked and ashamed at the deliberate slaughter of a young defenceless mother by proud patriots. Could you not just express your personal outrage rather than deflect the story to other matters.

    Reply
    • @Mark Hamilton- The people on this thread do not have to dance to your tune, regardless of your eagerness to speak down to them from your self created perch They are entitled to add anything that they like to this debate. If Ann wants to discuss other, related things she can and should do so free of your snide interjections. Regardless of your high opinion of yourself, you are not the administrator of this site, so your ignorant dismissal of her addition is unwelcome. The self indulgent assumptions you have made about the contributors to this debate reveal a lot about your character. When I challenged your comments about me earlier, where you cast dispersions on my character, and claimed I was part of a Sinn Fein/IRA attempt to sabotage this debate, you failed to reply, choosing instead to move on to make similar snide remarks to others. I am still waiting for you to withdraw that spurious allegation by the way! While I disagree with many peoples outlooks in this thread, particularly when it comes to the mindless violence perpetrated by the Provos, I respect their contribution and try not to belittle them. The contributors are entitled to add anything they like to the debate. Its the reason the Journal is so popular. It seems that even ignorant people like you can have a voice, which is unfortunate, but we have to take the good with the bad, it seems.

      Reply
    • Mark

      Let me assure you that I firmly believe the McConville family deserve both justice and the truth, about what happened to their loved one. I would imagine that that would go without saying. People dont need to make that point, it should be automatically presumed.

      My first comment was a question posed to Brian Lyons regarding a comment he made, and is directly related to the article. If the tapes are found to incriminate any member of Sinn Fein should that person be brought before the ICC as opposed to a British court with a British judge.

      As for my second comment, why would you conclude that it is not relevant? If those tapes also contain any information relating to the collusion between MI5, the British Army, the RUC and loyalist paramilitaries, will this information be made publicly available. The families of those who have lost their lives, and those who have to live with the physical and emotonal scars because of collusion with the loyalist parmilitaries. Are they also not entitled to justice and all information relating to such activities.

      Of course the judgement, coming when it did, is taking the focus away from Camerons announcement that they are going to carry out a criminal enquiry into the murder of 14 inncoent people on Bloody Sunday. Really the peoples eyes need to remain firmly on both balls and not let one overshadow the other.

      And thankyou Kenneth.

      Reply
  • Julie 08/07/12 #

    Tom? Tim!!!! Sorry serious typo’s this morning!!!!! Lol

    Reply

Add New Comment