TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

European Court of Human Rights to hear Cork woman’s abuse case

Louise O’Keeffe claims that the State is liable for abuse she suffered at the hands of a school principal in Kinsale, Co Cork in the 1970s.

The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
Image: jodastephen via Flickr/Creative Commons

THE EUROPEAN COURT of Human Rights (ECHR) will today hear an abuse case brought by the Cork woman Louise O’Keeffe who is seeking damages from the State for abuse she suffered as a child at the hands of a primary school principal.

O’Keeffe suffered abuse at the hands of former school principal Leo Hickey at Dunderrow National School in Kinsale, Co Cork in 1973 and her case before the court today is likely to impact of dozens of other abuse victims’ claims against the State for similar legal recourse.

In 2009,  her case was rejected by the Supreme Court in Ireland which said the State could not be held liable for the abuse she suffered as the school was run by the church.

The 48-year-old mother of two from west Cork claims that the State failed to structure the primary education system in a way that would protect her from abuse and says she has no remedy from the State in this regard.

She has identified a number of articles in the European Convention on Human Rights which she says were breached.

These including Article 14 – prohibition to discrimination – given the refusal of the State to compensate victims of abuse in national schools while accepting responsibility for abuse of other children who were based in industrial schools.

In October 2006, the High Court ordered Hickey, who was sentenced to three years in prison in 1998 after being convicted of assaulting a number of girls in the 1970s, to pay O’Keeffe €305,104 in damages.

Following enforcement proceedings Hickey, who claimed he had insufficient means to meet this amount, was ordered to pay O’Keeffe €400 a month. To date she has recovered around €25,000.

The right for O’Keeffe to bring her case before the ECHR in Strasbourg, France was challenged by the State which argued that she had not exhausted all legal remedies in the country as she had not sued the Bishop of Cork and Ross which was responsible for running the school.

But the ECHR declared her case admissable in June of last year saying that it was not necessary for her to also sue the bishop having already taken legal action against the State.

The case is getting under way in Strasbourg this morning.

Read next:

Comments (16 Comments)

  • Unbelievable in this day and age that a woman had to take her case to Europe to obtain justice !

    Reply
    • What justice? Her abuser was convicted and she succeeded in a civil action against him. That seems to be justice. It’s hard to see what her goal is other than money.

      Reply
    • The case is about accountability , as the “state” always tries to avoid it.

      Reply
    • Why would the state be accountable for the actions of one pervert?

      Reply
    • You will probably find out that there was complaints made that were not investigated which renders the state responsible

      Reply
    • Nothing new we had to go to the eu court of human rights to get the equal pay act for women & the women ABC had to do the same as they were refused abortions.

      Reply
    • I agree. Why didn’t her parents do something at the time

      Reply
    • @ Sean Beag . Justice can not always be measured in monetary terms .
      And if you read the article she has received only a tiny fraction of the money she was awarded !

      Reply
    • This is typical of our “Justice” system, how many other cases against the Irish system are there? I wish the poor woman all the best

      Reply
    • Just so we are clear, i am in no way absolving the people involved at the time. If she made a complaint and it was ignored she should also take those people to court too. I just fail to see how the current government could be held responsable for the actions of a government 40 years ago. How is that accountability?

      Reply
    • Too right!how are the state not responsible for the welfare of the nation’s children?!especially when state and church were so connected at the time.if she has every right to take her case.

      Reply
    • Sean Beag
      I totally agree and isn’t it about time that people recognised the duty of the State to deny any and all legal claims in the same manner that any individual or Organisation would. If the State simply accepts every claim for compensation without demur they would need to seek loans from the IMF to pay for them no matter what the merits of a case are.
      We are the most litigious Country in the world and when you add all of the compensation bills is it any wonder that the legal profession is so highly paid.
      The lady in this story has already succeeded in a legal claim against the perpetrator and as yet has not taken a case against the school owner and employer who is the Bishop and she should not be permitted to have three bites of the one cherry. It’s not big enough !

      Reply
    • @ Sean . If you follow that logic the church now is not accountable for abuse that happened decades ago and the state now is not accountable for the abuse that happened in the laundries !!!!!

      Reply
  • What do expect from a government that has to be rail roaded into apologising for the overwhelming abuse which took place in the laundries, and industrial schools. They wouldn’t have apologised only for the public out cry. Shameful. Surely we expect all children to be protected in schools.

    Reply
  • Has our justice system been reduced to a blind protection system for the mismanagement of the state.
    There is a duty of care, that cannot be ignored.

    Reply
  • sid 06/03/13 #

    Not taking from the abuse this lady has endured , where does all this end , it seems to me to be her parents that failed her , of course how long before people start seeking compensation from the state because their parents abused them.

    Reply

Add New Comment