TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Many would be better off on the dole rather than working, says ESRI

15 per cent of people without children and 44 per cent of people with children would be better off not working given the high costs involved.

Image: Photocall Ireland

THOUSANDS OF FAMILIES would be better off on the dole rather than working, according to an ESRI study.

The working paper found that the cost of working in Ireland is around €140 per week – or €7000 per year – for an employed person without children, increasing to €9000 per year for a family with children.

An estimated 15 per cent of people without children and 44 per cent of people with children would be better off not working given the high costs involved. The figure includes the costs of transport, childcare, lunches and appropriate clothing for work.

Expensive childcare is a major disincentive to work particularly for women. The study noted that Ireland has very expensive childcare, often costing around 30 per cent of a monthly wage.

People buying lunches at work and takeaway food at home in evening if they have no time or energy to cook can also take up a substantial amount of money.

The work suggests that work-related expenses are so high that jobs don’t necessarily act as an incentive to work.

Latest figures show that 14.8 per cent of the population – roughly 309,000 people – are currently out of work in Ireland.

The research in The Costs of Working in Ireland used the Household Budget Survey which looked at all private household in Ireland to analyse the data.

Read the full report >

Column: ‘Getting a job is the worst thing that’s ever happened to us’ >

Read next:

Comments (78 Comments)

  • B7584 12/06/12 #

    There is something so wrong with someone being financially better off on social welfare than in employment. I know its the case but its wrong.

    Reply
  • How could child care be organised in this country to make it cheaper? What do other countries do?

    Reply
  • The cost of commuting and childcare in particular is prohibitive. But they knew this years ago and failed to plan.

    Reply
  • Are there any unemployed people with childcare skills who might be able to undercut existing prices?

    Reply
  • Excuse me while I implode with rage.

    :implodes

    Reply
    • mattoid 12/06/12 #

      The more of these studies that conclude that someone is better off on benefits instead of working, the more the idea of a Universal Basic Income makes sense…

      Reply
    • No, Mattoid, no.

      Because UBI assumes that everyone has an inalienable right to not work and yet still reap the full benefits of society.

      No one has a right to not work. That would be incredibly stupid.

      People who do not contribute and who do not want to contribute and yet still want all the advantages that those who contribute get can take a long walk off a short pier.

      The sort of socialism that UBI proposes can only work if there is a strong component of capitalism that is willing and able to support it and allow it to leech off it. What actually happens is that in the longer term capitalism gets a bit fed up with socialism and would much prefer that it slings its hook in no short order, because if socialism stopped leeching off capitalism, capitalism realises that it would be much better off.

      Reply
    • mattoid 12/06/12 #

      I take your point, but unfortunately that mentality is there already with some people.
      The sort of UBI I’m talking about is one that is sufficient to provide for the very basics, ie. enough food to have a reasonable basic nutritious diet, and no frills accommodation. Not one that enables the recipient to run a car, buy designer clothing, go out to the pub, own an iPhone, take foreign holidays etc..
      That way the incentive to work is always there, but those who choose not to will not starve.

      Reply
  • So…. It costs €140 on average to go to work, and people taking part in the Fás Jobbridge scheme take home €238 basic (single person on €188 p/w plus €50 Jobbridge supplement), all the while costing the employer zero spondullis.
    Wow. Race to the bottom much?!

    Reply
  • The ordinary working men/women in this country are who are suffering the most in this recession yet contribute most to society, not those with the comfort blanket of the State. It is so bloody maddening.

    Reply
    • totally agree, why the hell am I breaking my back to pay for an easier life for someone on social welfare.

      Reply
    • @Jason Walsh in fairness you have to sympathise with a lot of people on welfare at the moment, I do believe that most people want to work. I’m sure the cost of being in work was much greater during the “good times”, when we were at almost full employment, and social welfare rates were far more generous. Of course there’s a small percentage who choose social welfare as a lifestyle choice, but its a little unfair to say people are on it for an easier life now!

      Reply
    • Barry, the cost of working is higher now than during the boom for two big reasons.

      1)Petrol prices are much higher
      2)Tax is higher. USC has reduced everyones take home pay dramatically, making costs a higher proportion of your pay.

      Reply
    • @Barry, I sympathise with people who find themselves unemployed after working all their lives, these people should be assisted in getting back to work asap. These people already have a work ethic. I have zero respect or tolerance for people who have never worked and are happy to cream the country for what they can, free house, fuel, esb, phone, every allowance known to man, and expect it as they are “entitled”. Most of us ordinary working people would be extremely lucky to have ?288 a week after mortgage. childcare, commuting costs etc are paid. In fact, I would say most would be lucky to have ?88 a week after these costs are paid. It’s a joke. If you have never paid income tax/PRSI you should get ?50 a week, end of. That way those who have become recently unemployed get maximum support and those working and contributing maybe get tax credits towards childcare or something else beneficial.

      Reply
    • As someone who worked for 20 years, paid tax at the higher rate and PRSI, I found myself unable to work after developing a long term illness and it pisses me right off when I hear sweeping generalisations about people living the high life thanks to the mega payment of 188 euros from the SW. However, given that I live in a community where unemployment was high during the boom times, I am only too aware that that is because there ARE people out there who have made living off the dole a lifestyle choice. This is because they know and use every trick in the book to get everything for nothing. What they dont get from the relieving (local welfare) officer the get from the “Vinnos”, and this allows them to spend money going on holidays to Spain every year and have cars. The majority of people who are on the dole are on it because they have been unlucky enough to lose their jobs and these people are more than entitled to collect their money every week because they worked and contributed to society.
      My opinion is this – if people have worked and paid their way they sould be entitled to their basic payments aswell as the extra benefits such as fuel allowance. If however, you have never worked then you’re benefit should be cut to around 150 euros which will just about allow you to pay rent, food, esb and phone, with no extra benefits (fuel allowance). It might incentivise these people to go out and pay their way, should we ever be in a situation where we are at full employment.

      Reply
  • I have to drive 150km to work and then back again while paying two toll charges each way, while many friends sit at home and are far better off, why do I bother

    Reply
  • 1 baby in a creche could cost 1100 euro a month!, although admittedly most creches are great some are just terrible as well and still charging this while cutting staff wages to minimum wage (effectively telling them we have no respect for you and if we could pay you less we would!) while management buy new cars every year. A lot of businesses are using this recession as an excuse to cut wages and entitlement for employees (even very profitable ones)

    Reply
  • Its unbelievable that even during the boom there was not proper state support for childcare. The cost should be fully deductable as an expense as it is incurred as a result of going to work or tax credits given for same. It has been shown that there would be a net benefit overall to the economy and in more progressive nations thwre is real support for parents who wish to be part of the workforce.

    There’s something fundamentally wrong with the system when a person can’t afford to get a job.

    Reply
  • Kildare 12/06/12 #

    More spin from the government funded ESRI so that they can cut the dole
    Why dont they do a comparison on politicians wages across the EU ?
    Oh yeah because the government don’t want to hear that

    Reply
  • I am currently unemployed and looking every where I can for a job but as much as I would love to be working I need to weight up the financial implications of taking a job to support my family. Its not my fault that I am out of work for the first time in twenty years and its not my fault that the social welfare system is the way that it is but all it is doing is helping my family and I survive. If somebody gave me fifty euro more than the dole I would start in the morning.

    Reply
    • toorkeel 12/06/12 #

      That’s the difference Seamus. It’s people like you that need maximum support and assistance in getting back to work, not the scrounger that has never worked a day in his life. I admire people like you who are trying to run a house and get back in the job market

      Reply
  • scobie 12/06/12 #

    Working mother of 3 regular 9 to 5 job. Drop kids to school every morning. In work for 9. Make my sambos for work night before cos can’t afford lunch out. Get home for 6. Make dinner. Put wash on etc. and try spend time with kids before bed. No money for anything else My Kids see other kids whose parents don’t work have time for them and money to spend on them. Trying to instil in my kids that u have to work to get things but when they see the opposite makes u wonder… I reckon I wud be better off on dole money wise time wise etc. I agree with posts about long term unemployed who never worked a day in their lives and those who through no fault of their own cant get work. We should have a system where if u never contributed tax then u get a lesser amount than those who have. The dole should not be a lifestyle choice for 18 year olds. Rant over!!!

    Reply
  • Hate the headline on this.

    Reply
  • Do unemployed people not have to eat lunch??

    Reply
  • It seems to me that in all the hot button issues – bankers, greedy politicians, immigrants, dole scroungers etc the question that riles people so much is one of fairness.
    Our social welfare system seems to me to be totally unfair – it penalises those who work and rewards those who choose not to. If you’ve never worked a day in your life you get entitlements coming out your jacksie and if you’ve been working and paying tax for 30 years you get no extra benefit from it. If you’ve been stupid enough to create a business that took you and possibly hundreds of other off the dole then all your and their taxes contributed to the state make you entitled to precisely zip from the social welfare system. I’m drawing broad strokes here but why don’t people see that this is madness? Even people that would want to work will choose to live off the taxpayer because its financial idiocy to do otherwise.

    Reply
  • And of course, what our glorious government are going to take from this is that instead of making it more attractive for people to work, they are going to make it even less attractive for people to go on the dole.

    Reply
  • Natalie 12/06/12 #

    This study is ridiculous. Basically what they did was look at how much people in employment spent on various things (food not cooked at home, transport, childcare), and compare that to how much unemployed people spent on the same things. Firstly, correlation doesn’t imply causation. People in employment would typically spend more (on average) on clothes and takeaways, because on average they have more money to spend. It doesn’t necessarily mean that they are buying those things because they work, they would be spending more money on them because they have more disposable income. Secondly, and more importantly, they didn’t phone people up and ask them how much they spend on work clothes/food/commuting. They pulled figures from the Household Budget Survey 2004/2005. Again, common sense would tell you that spending patterns have changed a lot since 2005 – whoever it was who was spending 450 euros a week on take-aways (table 2) probably isn’t doing it now.

    Reply
  • While I understand where they came up with the figures and I think childcare the possibly the biggest issue. I’m not sure if it’s as black and white as that.
    When you are at home and there is some money coming in from a partner. you are not going to sit at home like a hermit all day. This study seems to suggest that there are zero additional expenses when you are not working. I don’t think that’s the way it works. In fact leaving childcare out of it, being in work is a good way to avoid flittering away money during the day?

    Reply
    • Ridiculous viewpoint

      Reply
    • Fair enough. Well argued I guess.
      This has been my own experience though so what would I know.

      Reply
    • toorkeel 12/06/12 #

      I wouldn’t call commuting costs flittering away money. Another huge expense for working people. That’s what I disagree with

      Reply
    • No. Of course not.
      It’s not a big point but all I’m saying is that in our house when one of us wasn’t working, they ended up spending lots of money during the day. You tend to take more trips to the shops, take the kids more places, etc.
      Obviously this is only applicable where there is another income coming into the house.
      My point is that the report is very simplified. There are all sorts of factors.

      Reply
    • Agreed Fintan, maybe I was a bit crass with my first reply. Just maddened with this topic. I’ll tell you another one which made me laugh. A local creche, ?170 a week for a working person. ?25 if you are in the dole. How is that fair? Should the working person who is contributed not get the reduced rate?Why do you need childcare services if u are at home all day?

      Reply
    • If you are unemployed why would you be putting your child in a creche. Surely the ONLY advantage of being out of work is getting to spend more time with your children.

      Reply
    • Eleen 12/06/12 #

      Yes, but maybe single parents need some time to go look for work etc? I don’t know how easy it’d be going to interviews and handing out cvs if you have to bring children along.

      Reply
    • If that was the case they could organise a family member, friend or neighbour to look after the child/children for a couple of hours.

      Reply
    • toorkeel 12/06/12 #

      My point is Eleen, why should an ordinary working person have to pay extortionate money for childcare, while someone on the dole pay hardly anything. Your point about interviews, unless you are doing interviews 5 days a week, 8 hours a day, you don’t really need childcare on the dole, do you? The system is a joke

      Reply
  • I strongly think businesses should be lax when it comes to dress code. It’s amazing how much a working environment can benefit from semi-casual dress as apposed to full business attire. This would also cut the cost of clothing

    2c

    Reply
  • Its a simple case of maths.

    If the maths says stay on the dole then do so.

    If the maths say go to work then go to work.

    Paying the bills and keeping a roof over your head for you and the family is what its about when going through tough times.

    Reply
  • Is the 14.8 % of the entire population
    Or of the people whom can actually work?

    Reply
    • Isn’t that the number of people full time unemployed? Ie: not counting those signing for three days a week, doing training courses, gone back to college or on the woeful Jobbridge scheme?

      Reply
  • Its all academic now given the ESRI have just announced that the report is still a work in progress and should not have bee published yet.

    Reply
  • The fifth paragraph is a pathetic excuse. “Having to buy lunch or take out because you have no time or energy..” how many hours is that person working? If they work more them they can afford to buy lunch and if they work less they have all the time to make lunch!
    Or are they too busy being in the pub or sitting on their arse watching the Telly?

    Reply
    • What are you on about?

      Reply
    • Read the fifth paragraph!

      Reply
    • @ Declan. I think the statement is valid. I’m out the door every morning at 6, I’m at work for half seven. Clock out at 7pm home at half eight. By the time ive the dinner cooked and eat there’s days where I couldn’t be bothered/ genuinely forget to make the sandwiches. Simples

      Reply
    • Also the bit about working more and earning more, not everyone is on an hourly rate and or gets overtime

      Reply
    • I work a 12 hour shift for 11 days, then get 3 off. Can you tell me when I might get the time to sit in a pub duiring my 11 day shift? I’d love to know.

      Reply
    • I work a regular minimum wage job, 9.30-6, live in Dublin, work in Dublin. I leave at 8.30 in the morning & get back at usually around 7.30pm; by the time I get the tills balanced and get the bus home etc.

      To get enough sleep I need to be in bed by 11, leaving me 3.5 hours a day to cook, clean, do laundry, wash myself, spend time with my partner (we don’t have any days off together due to different work schedules), etc.

      Unless you want to insert a few more hours into my day, I dunno where I would begin to find the time to “sit on my arse”, watching telly, in the pub or otherwise.

      In theory, I *could* spend an hour or more making & cleaning up after dinner — which would be eaten at 9pm after having my (half-hour) lunch break at 12.30pm. Realistically? After being on my feet all day, not having eaten for 7-odd hours, yeah I’m gonna get a bloody takeaway. This makes me neither lazy nor exorbitant.

      And like I said, I work for minimum wage. I make about €50 a week more than if I were on the dole. Is it worth it? Not really, actually. But I do it anyway.

      Reply
    • Fair enough I get all your points

      Reply
  • Welfare is too generous…it needs a major overhaul…copy the Germans/Americans in everything you do economically…and you will not fail…longterm unemployable need to be reigned in…

    Reply
    • Yeah because we’d all love to live somewhere like America…

      And why do people keep blabbing on about the long-term unemployed? If you look back a few years you will see that we have a very small number of long-term unemployed. Irish people will work when there are jobs. As if this tiny minority of people are what’s ruining this country. Stop believing everything you read in the Sun.

      Reply
    • That’s not true. I recall in the early years of the last decade being amazed at the number of people I met who had opted out of the world of work. At one point I lived in a house split into 6 flats and I was the only one with a job. It made very little sense, especially at the time.

      Reply
  • They have just withdrawen the report.

    Reply
  • hi im spanish i never work in ireland but i was working in spain one year ago my cuestion is if i can get the dole here in ireland or any prestation i ben pay tax in a ue countrie thake you… i got a interview in two days with a social welfare oficer and i got my bpsn and i given to them old the docuentation to i got contracts pay stament for my job in spain i ben whaiting for this interview one month.

    Reply
  • Peter 12/06/12 #

    Cut the dole and you kill the trap

    Reply
  • mattoid 12/06/12 #

    I’m waiting to see the trend in the thumbing patterns between daytime thumbers and evening thumbers – I have noticed quite a difference in the past on various stories, mostly those related to dole/welfare topics…

    Reply

Add New Comment