TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

Report on property tax to be brought to Cabinet ‘shortly’

The Department of Environment has dismissed claims that the report by the expert group examining the issue is being suppressed.

Image: Images of Money via Flickr/Creative Commons

THE REPORT BY the expert group set up to examine the forthcoming property tax will be presented to cabinet shorty, the Department of Environment has said.

Environment Minister Phil Hogan set up an inter-departmental expert group to examine property tax proposals at the beginning of the year and received its final report over the summer.

But so far its findings have not been made public.

Today the group, Smart Taxes Network, suggested the government may be suppressing the report because it proposes a site value tax, a claim the Department of Environment denied.

“The report will be brought to Cabinet in the near future, it will be done shortly,” a spokesperson said when asked about the suggestion that the report was being held back by the Smart Taxes Network which advocates for the introduction of a site value tax.

The idea, which has been developed by a number of leading economists and commentators including Constantin Gurdgiev and Ronan Lyons, involves the property tax being calculated based on the value of the land rather than the value of the property.

The government has so far insisted that all that has been decided so far about the tax is that it will be collected by the Revenue Commissioners and will come into effect in the middle of next year.

Finance Minister Michael Noonan has ruled out a property tax that is levied based on 0.5 per cent of the value of a house, an idea which has support from the IMF but has been described by Noonan as “far too high”.

The Smart Taxes Network is holding a public debate in Trintiy College Dublin tonight at 7.30pm.

Column: The property tax shows our leaders are banking on another bubble

Read: Gilmore challenges Boyd-Barrett to find alternative to property tax

Department: Up to Revenue to decide how property tax is paid

Read next:

Comments (24 Comments)

  • Site value taxes don’t suit property developers who sit and horde land banks and derelict properties which would be taxed (encouraging developers to use them or sell them) under a site valuation based property tax. That’s the whole idea of a site valuation tax- you end up penalising developers for hoarding land and effectively forcing young familes to live further and further away from where they work, which has knock-on consequences for commuting times, quality of life, distance from schools, hospitals etc. A site valuation tax fits in perfectly with best practice urban planning.

    But this is Fine Gael and Phil Hogan we’re taking about here so it is highly unlikely they’ll introduce a site value tax, despite Ronan Lyons and others already clearly indicating that this is the best and most fairest way forward. Instead the FG modus operandi is to protect the interests of property developers and instead get smaller folks to pay a higher tax than what is necessary.

    Its like Fianna Fail never went away.

    Reply
  • Site value tax really the only way to go but it’s going to upset the FG urban vote who still like the notion that the land their house is built on has more value than it’s basic utility.

    Oh and NAMA really won’t like a site value tax bringing down the LTEV of development land.

    Reply
  • The very fact the content of this report haven,t yet being debated in the dail, or seen by the general public proves its contents are gonna be unpopular and not sit too well with ordinary people.

    Reply
  • Taxing debt is a very stupid idea. Now we are going to pay interest to the banks and to the government. We are slaves being paid pretend money. All because we have a pretend government.

    Reply
    • Well Robert, I for one will be taking the money directly out of my mortgage repayments, they seriously expect me to pay a tax for the privledge of having a mortgage? LOL LOL not this sucker.

      Reply
    • Robert
      Listen pet…………………in case you didn’t know………………we’re spending more than we take in ………………The overspending is mainly on Health and Social Welfare…………….so the a government needs everyone to pay more in taxes. ………..did you not know!

      Reply
    • Paddy Rodgers………… in case you didn’t know……….. we will be paying bond holders 1 billion euro on the 1st of October………… here’s a suggestion lets use that to cover the expected take of the property tax!

      Hope I got the number of full stops right.

      Reply
  • Oooh I can’t wait! More media speculation and ‘informed sources’ from the Indo

    Reply
  • Amanda 24/09/12 #

    The thing is, one person will pay and then everyone will pay.
    I worked for my money, I paid my taxes and because I built for myself a domicile instead
    of drinking and snorting the money, I must now pay for the privilege of wiping my own arse
    in the private of my own house.
    It is time to stand up for yourselves and not pay house tax,rte tax and septic tank tax.
    Simple mathematics, the government is spending 19 billion more than they in!!!!!!,
    am I supposed to make up the shortfall?????
    This debt will never be repaid, every person in this country needs to come up with 28000 euros to clear the debt.
    An then what?, more taxes to pay for a country that can’t run itself?? up O’Reilly!!!
    This is a fantastic country, we live in a society that takes money from the people that work
    and give it to the people that don’t.

    Reply
  • I started reading a great book on this yesterday
    ‘The Fair Tax’
    edited by Emer O Siochru.

    Very interesting on the SITE Value subject, and it was a theory supported by people like Michael Davitt.

    Keep the faith Derek Larney.

    Despite that eejit Phil Hogan, this may be chosen as the way to go !

    Can’t make the debate tonight in Trinity.

    Reply
  • Sean 24/09/12 #

    WOW! AN INTERDEPARTMENTAL EXPERT GROUP! Brendan Howlin must missed the memo on that one! So we have loads of info and people to help impose a new property tax but no one to help poor Brendan.
    SHAME ON THEM!

    Reply
  • Not Paying A Tax on the family HOME .

    Reply
  • I think that the property tax is unfair for everybody except those earning over 150,000 and they are the ones who should be paying it,, not the poor person.

    Reply
    • Lots of countries have property tax systems in place for years, hell Ireland of old had one that was based on the number of windows in a property (that’s where the half door came from as it wasn’t taxed as a window), have a look around at old buildings in the city and you’ll see blocked up windows which was done to lower the tax on the property. Ireland should have a property tax but it does need to be fair, the site valuation tax is the fairest system I’ve read about so far.

      Reply
    • Reg 24/09/12 #

      We had a property tax until very recently in the form of high stamp duty rates that was very unfair. The idea of an annual tax is much fairer but will have to see how it is calculated.

      Reply
  • Raise corporation tax by 2%

    Reply
  • Neither of the proposed models are fair in calculating an appropriate level of tax on a home,unless income is taken into account.
    Outside factors are what determine both the site value and the market value of a house.For example,if someone buys a house in a fairly poor area in a town or city and if that person does not progress in their career or pay scale,by the time they reach middle age there may have been natural gentrification occuring in the area thus driving up property prices and site values as the area becomes desirable to live in.This would mean that an ever increasing percentage of disposable income would be going towards servicing a property tax.
    The same would happen if property speculators started buying land parcels or houses for redevelopment in your area,the tax on your home could simply make it financially unviable for lower waged workers to remain living in their own homes.
    The only fair tax,if there is to be one at all,has to be linked to earnings,otherwise the “market” rules all and we can all see how well thats worked out for this country so far.

    Reply
    • I agree. Some decades ago we had a property tax for a couple of years. It took both property value and income into account. That should be looked at before a final decision is made. If they do not take earnings into account, it will be grossly unfair.
      The tax if it exists should take account of
      Site value
      Expected sale value
      Previous years earnings
      Property taxes paid in the past 5 years.
      Revenue can put up a calculator on their website to help people work it out.
      Revenue should send out bills to those involved on 1/3 2013 and every year thereafter.

      Reply
    • Good analysis Nial. It all sems that an increase in the higher rate of tax would be the fairest.

      Reply
  • ColindeB 25/09/12 #

    I don’t remember these principled objections being raised when stamp duty was pouring into government coffers…

    Reply

Add New Comment