Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE FORMER MAYOR of Naas, who has lost the Fine Gael whip following controversial remarks he made about African immigrants last year, has said he has paid a “very high personal price” for what happened.
In an interview with TheJournal.ie Darren Scully said that he felt there was a “witchhunt” against him and accused the Labour TD who reported him to the Gardaí about his remarks of possibly attempting to “garner a bit of publicity for himself”.
Scully resigned as Mayor of Naas last November and apologised for remarks he made in a number of radio interviews where he said that he was no longer going to represent African immigrants because of their “aggressiveness” adding that they were “quick to play the race card”.
His remarks were widely condemned at the time but Scully cited the reaction of leaders of the African community in Ireland to his subsequent apology and the criticism he received as punishment enough.
“After resigning as Mayor and offering a genuine apology, members of African community accepted my apology and said it was time for everyone to move on,” he told TheJournal.ie.
I felt that most people would have accepted my apology but the party have taken the decision to sanction me once more, punish me once more on top of everything else and I’m very disappointed.
Scully, 38, said that he not yet made a decision on whether or not he would continue to be a member of the party but noted that he had stood for Fine Gael in the 2005 by-election and the 2007 general election “when people didn’t see the party as fashionable”.
He said that he had not been selected to run in the last election “when it was fashionable to run for Fine Gael” adding: “I feel let down by this decision. It’s a reaction to appease certain people within society. It’s unfair to me who has apologised and resigned.
“I’ve had to put up with small minded people sending pathetic little threats and emails to me over the last couple of months. I paid a price, it would have been nice to have been given a second chance and told to learn from that mistake.”
He went on to say: “What more do people want? Are we looking for a witchhunt here or something? It looks like that to me.”
Scully also said that he had been the subject of two complaints under the Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act 1989 including one from Labour TD Aodhán Ó Ríordáin, which he described as “ludicrous”.
A file regarding the complaints is currently with the Director of Public Prosecutions but Scully said it had been terrible for him to “find myself in a police station being interviewed” about his remarks.
He said there were “certain sections of society who won’t be happy until I am, I don’t know, deported somewhere.”
On Ó Ríordáin receiving hate mail following his complaint to Gardaí, Scully said: “I have heard what happened to him. It’s not acceptable in any society.
“Everybody is entitled to their views and their opinions. People are entitled to their views and opinions as long as they are not threatening or insulting to any group. What happened to him was not right.
“I do think though that we’re in dangerous ground. When people say something, I don’t think people should start phoning the police. What I said was not incitement to hatred.
What he did was a little bit jumping the gun and maybe trying to garner a bit of publicity for himself. He should have at least rang me to discuss it.
“Aodhan Ó Ríordáin got that stuff after he made the complaint”, he added, referring to the hate mail the Labour TD has received. “Maybe people said: ‘Why are you doing this?’. He got that stuff because of what he said, not because of my actions.”
Scully also said that he felt there were “certain people out there showing no tolerance.”
“People want to calm down a little bit and look at themselves and decide what is it that they want,” he said. “I have been extremely honest as a politician. I am getting crucified for it. I’ve apologised enough and I’ve looked for forgiveness enough.”
Scully added that he had been “heartened” by the reaction of the African community to his apology for his remarks. He also said that he would “absolutely” continue as an independent councillor and be putting his name forward for re-election in the 2014 local elections.
The father-of-three added that he could not comment on his current employment situation. The engineer had previously said that he feared for his job prospects in light of the controversy his original remarks had caused.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Looks like a very well managed response from dfb.
@Toca Stories: agreed. Not an easy job ..
How’s the traffic now, with the woke city transport plan to cut off the thoroughfare?
@Rafa C: 60% less traffic and 20 minutes won for commuters so it’s pretty good. No need a car to go in the city center so it doesn’t matter.
@Alex: not what it i was asking. Presume you meant 20 minute walk. Which was always the case.
@Rafa C: They meant worse for car drivers and better for everyone else
@Mick Duvanny: not what I was asking though.
@Rafa C: As I said, it is better, can’t you read? Are you missing some grey matter or having trouble to understand basic concepts?
@Rafa C: It’s 20 win for commuters by bus not walk. I assume you don’t live in Dublin so you are just a clueless potato.
@Rafa C: how can a traffic plan be woke? Lol.
@Alex: Born and bred in Dublin, don’t live there anymore. I’m asking how the traffic diversion has affected the already diverted traffic and is it adding to the problematic traffic in other areas.
@John Moore: The traffic plan is an example of ‘woke’ thinking because it’s based on a pretentious ideology that aims to redistribute traffic for the supposed benefit of the wider community. It’s sold as a progressive solution to congestion or pollution, but in reality, only a small group of people benefit, while the majority are negatively affected. It prioritises symbolic gestures over practical outcomes, leaving thousands stuck in longer commutes or forced into less convenient routes, all to satisfy an agenda that sounds good in theory but doesn’t actually improve the situation for a majority of people.
@Alex: and save your nasty comments if you can’t reply kindly then don’t
@Rafa C: Alex’s first language must not be English from what I can read. His posts are barely legible. And then he tries to be smart out of embarrassment by saying his grey matter spiel. He is to he pitied really.
@Pat Corr: Agreed – it was a basic question and still hasn’t been answered.
bloody scooters always going on fire!
bloody EV’s always going on fire!
Oh wait, its a truck and its not electric at all.
Who knew that filling a truck with flamiable liquad would be dangerous!
@Martin Bishop:
Except diesel isn’t a flammable liquid (note spelling)… It’s classified as combustible.
@Regular John: Determining if diesel is flammable or combustible depends on its flash point (the minimum temperature at which fuel vapours given off by a flammable liquid can catch fire if exposed to a flame). This is why throwing a match into some types of diesel will put out the flame, but you can’t do this with petrol.
Flammable fuels have a flash point below 60 °C, however the flash point of diesel varies between about 52 °C to 93 °C, so depending on the blend is can be classed as a flammable liquid.
Diesel in Ireland has a flash point of >55°C, therefore Diesel is classed as flammable liquid. This is the classification for Diesel in Ireland:
4.3.1 Overland transport
Class: 3 – Flammable liquids
Danger code: 30
ADR classification code: F1
ADR danger labels: 3 – Flammable liquid
On the other hand, biodiesel has a flash point >130 °C, it is a combustible liquid.
That said, a combustible liquid can become a flammable liquid if heated enough, e.g, heating a fuel tank in a fire that then ruptures. Thus, the question if a fuel is combustible or flammable, in a fire, is often a moot point.
@David Jordan: an epic technical burn bravo
@David Jordan: Ha ha… I don’t think you actually know what flashpoints mean. You’re a great man for going straight to Google on subjects you obviously know nothing about.
A flash point of 52⁰C means the fuel is not flammable until it reaches that temperature. I don’t think we’ve ever had that kind of ambient temperature in Ireland and that is why diesel is not considered flammable. A match thrown into a bucket of diesel at ambient temperatures will always put out the flame, not sometimes as you state, always.
Looks like the fake news by Jak has been scraped! Good call.
@Alex: How can news be scraped?
Hopefully the structural members didn’t get hit with too much heat. Fire and structural steel aren’t a good mix.
Now that it’s reopened I’ll go on!
have your say