TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Sunday 26 May, 2013

‘Important step’ as WTC health programme adds 50 types of cancer

They were added to a list of World Trade Center attack-related illnesses covered by a health coverage programme. Today marks the 11th anniversary of the attacks.

Image: Mark Lennihan/AP/Press Association Images

THE US FEDERAL government has added about 50 types of cancer to the list of September 11 World Trade Center-related illnesses that will be covered by a programme to pay for health coverage.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety announced the change yesterday, on the eve of today’s 11th anniversary of the terrorist attacks.

Important step

NIOSH director Dr John Howard said in a statement:

The publication of this final rule marks an important step in the effort to provide needed treatment and care to 9/11 responders and survivors through the WTC Health Programme.

The institute said last June that it favoured expanding the existing $4.3 billion September 11 health programme to include people with 50 types of cancer.

That move followed years of lobbying by construction workers, firefighters, police officers, office cleaners and others who fell ill in the decade after the terror attack, which destroyed the 110-story twin towers, spewing toxic dust.

NIOSH acted after an advisory committee made up of doctors, union officials and community advocates recommended that cancer be added. Previously, the aid effort had covered only people with mostly less-serious ailments, including asthma, acid reflux disease and chronic sinus irritation.

Elevated

While stories about first responders struck by cancer are common, there is still little scientific evidence of elevated cancer rates connected to World Trade Center dust or other toxins at the ground zero recovery site in lower Manhattan. Scientists say there is little research to prove that exposure to the toxic dust plume caused even one kind of cancer.

Questions about whether the dust truly caused cancer were a reason Congress did not include it in the initial list of covered illnesses.

But some occupational health experts expressed concern about the presence of carcinogens in the ash and soot, and the advisory panel said it believed there were enough toxins present that it was plausible that some people with heavy exposures might get cancer.

Elected officials praised the decision.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg said:

We have urged from the very beginning that the decision whether or not to include cancer be based on science; Dr. Howard’s decision, made after thorough consideration of the latest available research and data, will continue to ensure that those who have become ill due to the heinous attacks on 9/11 get the medical care they need and deserve.

New York’s two US senators, Democrats Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand, said in a statement:

Today’s announcement is a huge step forward that will provide justice and support to so many who are now suffering from cancer and other illnesses.

There had been some concern that adding cancer to the list of covered conditions could strain the programme’s resources. Congress capped funding for the programme at $1.55 billion for treatment and $2.78 billion for compensation payments, and adding cancer to the eligible diseases will not increase the funding.

Some 60,000 people already have enrolled in 9/11 health programmes for those who lived or worked within the disaster zone. Up to 25,000 more could join before the programme closes.

Read: On the 11th anniversary of 9/11, still no opening date for memorial museum>

Read next:

Comments (37 Comments)

  • Well certainly the fact that the US government at the time flew the Bin Laden family out of the country the day after 9/11 makes you wonder what really happened… Osama Bin Laden always denied he had anything to do with it too…

    Reply
  • This is the best documentary i have come across dealing with those tragic events. Non-conspiratorial in content, it does ask questions which still stand. False flag or not, the planet has suffered terribly since.

    http://www.filmsforaction.org/Watch/911_Press_for_Truth/

    Reply
  • I too believe it was an inside job after reading and watching the alternate evidence that seemed to be brushed under the carpet for example the thermite burns on the structural steel on the wtc buildings.
    More on point with the article what about the first responder volunteers who helped with rescuing of injured that have developed all kinds of illnesses including respiratory problems while trying to do good and help their fellow man. These poor people have been left to die with no support either financially or medically from the us gov as they were not employees of emergency services

    Reply
    • Stephen
      With the numbers running the way they are the survivors of 1916 that were in the GPO will be looking for compensation.

      Reply
    • I knew it wouldn’t take long for someone to mention the ‘inside job’ theory. Stephen & Graham, your comments are an insult to those ‘first responders’ who were killed or injured trying to help people – to suggest that they were basically sent to the slaughter by their own country is a disgusting and vapid statement.
      As Xadovan said, you belong in the same category as the holocaust and moon landing-deniers.

      Reply
    • @mark many first responders agree with what were saying.it is you who has your head in the sand.

      Reply
    • Mick I’m not sure what your comment suggests or points out maybe you could elaborate
      Mark I am not part of the legion of holocaust denouncers that is insulting to my character as for the American gov they are capable of and are directly responsible for many atrocities around the world over the last few decades and that’s the ones that are publicised the war on terror for example citing WMD that never existed. What about all the black opps that are never reported.
      The us administration is well capable of carrying out the mass genocide of its own people if for the greater good of the Halliburton’s and Lockheed Martins. I am not insulting the dead/survivors/ first responders by my earlier comment I was simply stating the fact that authorities pleaded for volunteers to help not giving them adequate ppe and now they are sick all they do is rip them off with overpriced medication as Michael Moores “sicko” brought to light

      Reply
    • Mick I’m not sure what your comment suggests or points out maybe you could elaborate
      Mark I am not part of the legion of holocaust denouncers that is insulting to my character as for the American gov they are capable of and are directly responsible for many atrocities around the world over the last few decades and that’s the ones that are publicised the war on terror for example citing WMD that never existed. What about all the black opps that are never reported.
      The us administration is well capable of carrying out the mass genocide of its own people if for the greater good of the Halliburton’s and Lockheed Martins. I am not insulting the dead/survivors/ first responders by my earlier comment I was simply stating the fact that authorities pleaded for volunteers to help then not giving them adequate ppe and now they are sick all they do is rip them off with overpriced medication as Michael Moores “sicko” brought to light

      Reply
    • Of course they do, you can also find many people who believe the moon landing didn’t happen.

      Reply
    • So they pulled off 9/11 Stephen but they couldn’t bury some fake WMD’s in the Iraqi desert?

      Reply
  • You conspiracists all give George W a lot of credit. Are you sure you believe? I mean really sure???

    Reply
    • I am really sure Paul but I’m not giving W any credit he wouldn’t have the brains to come up wit anything he was just the puppet face that delivered the prewritten speeches that kept up the pr spin. Everyone my main point and il reiterate is not the conspiracy of the wtc but of the volunteers who are left to die in severe pain all because the administration will not do the honourable thing and look after their medical bills all because they were volunteers and not paid employees of the emergency services

      Reply
  • Game, set and match to xadovan!

    Reply
  • @mark . Lightweight truss buildings . I’m sorry but those buildings were designed to take multiple impacts from fully laden planes ( the biggest passenger planes flying at the time of their construction ) . Next argument pls .

    Reply
    • They did survive the impact of the planes! For quite a long time! Jet fuel and burning building materials like furniture, paint,computers, carpeting, paper, human beings, wiring is what melted the Q decking and outer supports. Steel I beams expand when heated to 1,000 snaping welds and rivets. Because of the jet fuel temperatures were over 3,000 degrees. These temperatures liquified the trusses. The upper floors fell on the lower floors causing an impact load. Simple physics, that an Iron worker or engineer can explain to you! We found melted I beams in the wreckage I saw it with my own eyes!

      Reply
  • I give you a rope and you hang yourself. Ok your right the us government blew up the buildings! They place explosives the buildings, flew planes with fictional passengers into it. LOL!!!

    Reply
  • @john Byrne. Steel losses its strength at around 600 degrees. In a structural situation with thousands of tons of weight being supported then you add impact load collapse is the reality! I have been in garage fires that were hotter then 600 degrees. Typical structural fires burn at 2500 degrees. The high temperatures are from interior materials that are made from petroleum products, like plastics. Thousands of gallons of jet fuel burning inside of a building added to that fire load! Also even though there were gaping holes in the building the fire is burning inside the building this insulates the fire creating even higher temperatures, just like the inside of a kiln with refractor brick. The Steel would not have to melt for collapse to happen but it did. It’s a shame I have to explain this just days after 9/11!

    Reply
  • The fact that you saw it with your own eyes is even more disturbing to me , jet fuel does not melt steel into pools of molten metal , you talk of physics when what u describe is a physical impossibility . I use oxy acetaline torches in work on a daily basis to cut steel there is no way jet fuel in an uncontrolled environment can produce this much heat . You also speak of welds and rivets giving way to cause the collapse if this is the case every weld rivet and bolt had to fail at the exact same time to cause a free fall collapse . Also what caused the concrete to be completely pulverized , was this the energy released from breaking welds and popping bolts and rivets

    Reply
  • Just a side note mark I have great respect for the job you do and for all the 1st responders . My father was a firefighter for 35 yrs and I saw 1st hand the effects of such a stressful job . Unfortunately the us government let everbody down that day . Whether or not they were directly responsible for the events of that terrible day , they absolutely had fore knowledge and have used it since to legitimize their imperialistic ambitions

    Reply
  • Top documentaries explosive evidence experts speak out . Watch it . Nuff said.

    Reply
  • Kevin 11/09/12 #

    It’s funny that we have to wait for a group in known liars to add cancer to the list of covered conditions in order to acknowledge the facts.

    Reply
  • I am convinced that the people who read this paper are “f” up! Conspiracy? You are an idiot! Planes with hundreds of gallons of jet fuel crashed into a light weight truss constructed building piloted by Islamic extremist is what destroyed those buildings! The US had nothing to gain by trying to destroy the financial capital of the country! I am fdny and find this kind of buffunary to be quit disappointing! Don’t bother responding because I’m finished with this Irish rag! I’m delegating the app!

    Reply

Add New Comment