#Open journalism No news is bad news

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support The Journal
Dublin: 4°C Sunday 28 November 2021
Advertisement

Facebook ends facial recognition over privacy fears

The announcement came as the tech giant battles one of its worst crises ever.

File photo of a phone showing the Facebook logo
File photo of a phone showing the Facebook logo
Image: Jirapong Manustrong/Shutterstock

SCANDAL-HIT FACEBOOK is shutting down its long-criticised facial recognition system and deleting scan data on a billion people, it said today, in a shock response to privacy concerns.

The announcement came as the tech giant battles one of its worst crises ever, with reams of internal documents leaked to reporters, lawmakers and US regulators fuelling fresh calls for government regulation.

This policy change shuts down a feature that automatically identified people who appeared in Facebook users’ digital photos, and was key to the company building a global library of faces that became a magnet for controversy.

“This change will represent one of the largest shifts in facial recognition usage in the technology’s history,” wrote Jerome Pesenti, the vice president of artificial intelligence at Facebook’s parent company Meta.

“There are many concerns about the place of facial recognition technology in society, and regulators are still in the process of providing a clear set of rules governing its use,” he added.

Pesenti did not directly explain why the change was announced at a moment when the company was deluged with reports based on leaked documents that argued executives know the platform could cause harm.

Winding down the system “will result in the deletion of more than a billion people’s individual facial recognition templates”, he wrote, adding it would take place over the coming weeks.

Privacy advocates welcomed the news, but some were concerned it was an effort to score points amid recent public relations disasters.

“My feed is equally divided between people who think Facebook’s decision to stop using its facial recognition system and delete faceprints is a big deal and the people who think it’s a desperate grab for positive headlines that changes nothing of substance,” tweeted Eva Galperin, director of cybersecurity at watchdog Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Privacy concerns

Facial identification, launched in 2010, went through changes to tighten privacy, but still was central to a significant lawsuit and regulatory scrutiny.

The social network agreed in 2020 to a $650 million (about €561 million) payout after failing to win dismissal of a case alleging it illegally collected biometric information for “face tagging” in violation of a 2008 Illinois privacy law.

The deal was one of the largest settlements in a US privacy case, topped only by Facebook’s $5 billion (€4.3 billion) deal with the Federal Trade Commission on its data practices.

Several US cities including San Francisco have passed bans on the use of facial recognition technology. There are concerns about creating large databases with errors in identifying some individuals.

#Open journalism No news is bad news Support The Journal

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support us now

In the United States, faced with pressure from watchdogs, tech giants like Amazon, Microsoft, IBM and Google have stopped, at least temporarily, selling facial recognition software to police forces.

“Facial recognition is one of the most dangerous and politically toxic technologies ever created. Even Facebook knows that,” said Caitlin Seeley George, campaign director at digital advocacy group Fight for the Future.

As the company battles the whistleblower revelations, it has changed its parent company name to Meta in an effort to move past being a scandal-plagued social network to its virtual reality vision for the future.

Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp — which are used by billions around the world — will keep their names under the rebranding that critics have called an effort to distract from the platform’s dysfunction.

© AFP 2021 

About the author:

AFP

Read next:

COMMENTS (13)

This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
write a comment

    Leave a commentcancel