We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

reyaad khan

Why was it reported that this man was killed twice?

David Cameron has confirmed the death of Reyaad Khan this week, although his death was initially reported in July.

BRITISH NEWS OUTLETS yesterday widely reported the deaths of two British-born Islamic state militants in a drone strike carried out by the RAF.

On Monday British PM David Cameron confirmed to Parliament that Reyaad Khan and Ruhul Amin had been killed in the attack near Raqqa in Syria on 21 August.

the guardian The Guardian The Guardian

Both men had featured prominently in a recruitment video for Isis in June of last year.

However, some confusion has since arisen about the death of one of the men, with a number of news outlets having reported that Reyaad Khan was killed in July of this year.

the telegraph - 1 The Telegraph The Telegraph

the mail The Mail Online The Mail Online

the guardian - 1 The Guardian The Guardian

The reporting of his death by the papers faced criticism on social media for not having shown enough vigilance in reporting the story for the second time.

However, while there had been reports of Khan being killed by an air strike in July, these were not confirmed by UK police or its Foreign Office.

Coverage was based on collated social media reports and local sources that said Khan had been killed by an airstrike alongside two other Britons.

Shiraz Maher, a senior fellow at the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation at King’s College in London tweeted at the time that his organisation was confident that Reyaad Khan had been killed, but that it could not state that categorically.

While covering the story, outlets at the time were careful not to state outright that Khan had been killed, with Guardian journalist Roy Greenslade pointing to the use of qualifiers and single-quotation marks in headlines as evidence of this.

In a statementThe Guardian has stated that, “our original report was couched cautiously to be clear that the claim was not verified by all parties. We have referenced that the original report of Khan’s death was incorrect in the profile we ran today.”

Read: Britain kills two of its own citizens in Syrian drone strike

Also: Here are some of the heritage sites Islamic State have blown up so far

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.