Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Urantsetseg Tserendorj
Courts

Urantsetseg Tserendorj murder: Sentencing of teen delayed due to 'yawning gap' in legislation

The judge said the Children Act does not deal with young offenders such as the accused in this case.

LAST UPDATE | 8 Feb 2023

THE SENTENCING OF the 17-year-old boy who murdered Urantsetseg Tserendorj has been further delayed after the judge found that it is time for legislative intervention or a definitive ruling on the law covering the sentencing of children convicted of serious offences.

The boy’s defence counsel today asked the court to adjourn sentencing to await a response from the Oireachtas.

Mr Justice Tony Hunt at the Central Criminal Court said the Children Act 2001 does not fulfil the role of a coherent and comprehensive framework in that it fails to deal with young offenders such as the accused in this case.

He identified what he called a “yawning gap” in the legislation which he said “cries out for reform,” and “should be attended to because it is merited on its own terms and, if not, it will thrust litigation upon the State”.

Mr Justice Hunt said that his preference was to impose a sentence of detention for life on the defendant with a review after 13 years.

However, he said there are concerns regarding what can and can’t be done by judges when a person sentenced as a juvenile comes before them for review.

There is no provision for suspended sentences, he said, and no way for the court to impose conditions on the defendant if he is released following a sentence review.

“That is a very unsatisfactory position for any review to be ordered in 13 years if that is the position then. It is one that is unfair to [the defendant] and to society.”

He said that the absence of any provision for suspended sentences will leave the reviewing judge with a binary choice to either continue the life sentence or set a date for release without any follow up.

The “carrot and stick” approach, whereby a judge can impose conditions on a person following their release, is absent and therefore the review process is “entirely unsuitable,” he said.

Mr Justice Hunt added: “These cases are too difficult to be left to the ad-hoc approach that has built up over the years. It is time for legislative intervention and, failing that, it is time for an updated definitive ruling in relation to these matters.”

Michael O’Higgins SC, for the defendant, asked the court to adjourn sentencing to await a response from the Oireachtas.

However, he also pointed out that there is urgency in the case as O’Higgins’ client is approaching his 18th birthday when he would be treated as an adult.

The mandatory sentence for murder for an adult is life imprisonment.

Mr Justice Hunt adjourned the matter to 22 February.

The accused, who was 14 at the time of the offence and cannot be named because he is a minor, had denied the murder of Tserendorj but had pleaded guilty to her manslaughter on 29 January 2021.

He was found guilty of her murder by a jury last year.

Comments are closed as legal proceedings are ongoing.

Author
Eoin Reynolds and Paul Neilan