Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Zsolt Biczo via Shutterstock
Research

Saving a penalty: This is how science helps predict the match score

Researchers propose a new model to explain how a goalkeeper dives to the right corner at the right time in penalty kick situations.

HAVE YOU EVER wondered how top goalkeepers such as Manuel Neuer or Gianluigi Buffon decide which corner to dive to a penalty kick situation? A new study may have cracked the secret.

Ever since the first penalty kicks were introduced to soccer in 1891, experts, coaches and supporters have puzzled over the question of why some goalkeepers are better at stopping penalties than others.

A new review of previous literature, published in the German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, now proves that simply learning what corner to dive to is not enough. It’s important that goalkeepers also perfectly calculate their dive to get to the corner at the right time.

Typically, the time a goalkeeper requires to get into the right corner of a goal to save a penalty is less than the time available. A goalkeeper waiting for a penalty shooter has only half a second after the ball has been kicked to decide which side of the goal to dive to.

As it takes the average goalkeeper about 0.6 seconds to reach a specific side, and a full second to stretch upwards towards the top corner of the goal area, this leaves little time to take in visual cues such as the ball-flight pattern and its trajectory.

In this study, lead author John van der Kamp and his colleagues worked on a new model that takes into account both where and when to dive.

Their affordance-based control model captures the constraints that must be satisfied to successfully save a penalty kick. This includes aspects of lateral velocity, and therefore the magnitude and force of a dive, and scales goalkeepers’ required actions to their maximum capabilities.

According to van der Kamp and his team, former research exclusively focused on how goalkeepers choose the side of the goal to dive to based on the actions of the player during the run-up and the kick.

Most of this work has been carried out by analysing how goalkeepers respond to video footage of penalty kicks without actually making a dive or jump. Based on this research, goalkeepers are recommended to observe specific visual cues in a player’s run-up and kick.

As diving was not part of this early work, the new study highlights that not much is yet known about how precisely goalkeepers time their dives within the penalty kick situation.

Van der Kamp believes that it is critically important to uncover what visual cues in a player’s run-up and kick, or any other information sources help them decide when to start diving.

“Goalkeepers may also benefit from additional information that tells them to start diving early or late when facing a particular player,” van der Kamp added, as he referred to German goalkeeper Jens Lehmann whose famous cheat sheet not only told him what side the players were most likely to kick from, but also how long he should wait before starting the dive.

“We argue that goalkeepers in a penalty kick situation should regulate their actions in ways that sustain the perception of ‘stopability’,” he said.

“This perspective will support individually-tailored interventions, which are particularly commonplace among elite players. We look forward to further research and analysis to verify this model.”

Your Voice
Readers Comments
14
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel